Gabriel García Márquez's Cien Años De Soledad

1182 Words3 Pages

Named as one of the greatest novelists and writers of the 20th century, the name of Gabriel García Márquez is generally associated with the much acclaimed novel Cien Años de Soledad which was first published in 1967. In an interview shortly after the Nobel prize winning author’s death, Pablo Neruda described Cien Años de Soledad as ‘the greatest work to be written in the Spanish language since the publication of Cervantes’ Don Quixote’ and it is said that only the bible has sold more copies in the Spanish language than the works of Gabriel García Márquez (Pontiero, 1981). However, the immense success of the author’s masterpiece has somewhat overshadowed the importance of an earlier narrative, El coronel no tiene quien le escriba. Completed …show more content…

She is inextricably linked to the rooster as she invariably shifts back and forth between hope (that the rooster’s existence will one day rescue them from the poverty they find themselves in), resentment (that the rooster gets too much attention, jeopardising their finances and in turn their health) and impatience (for the rooster to either be sold, or taken away and killed for food) (Pelayo, 2001). The rooster is the sole hope for the colonel, doctor, children and everybody else in the town, as it presents them with the prospect of escaping from poverty under martial law. However, the only character that does not hold the same view as the rest of the town is the colonel’s wife. It is clear that throughout the narrative, the wife’s views on the rooster are mostly negative ‘No sé qué le han visto a ese gallo tan feo. A mí me parece un fenómeno: tiene la cabeza muy chiquita para las patas’. Physically repulsed by its appearance, her negative thoughts stem from a much deeper hatred as the rooster reminds her of both her son’s untimely death and the poverty stricken life both herself and the colonel are forced to lead because of his refusal to part with the …show more content…

Or perhaps, he simply wants to keep her happy. After all, we learn later on that she is the one person in the novel who cannot stand the cockerel. Unlike her husband, the colonel’s wife is not an idealist or a dreamer. She is a practical woman who adapts to the poverty stricken life she and her husband lead, making forceful and realistic decisions every day. The wife often has to take on the responsibility of reminding the colonel of the gravity of the situation, in that they are practically on the brink of death. ‘Y tú te estás muriendo de hambre. Para que te convenzas que la dignidad no se come.’ While the colonel is out all day trying to find solutions to his hopeless problems, the asthmatic wife somehow manages to sustain their household where money is nearly always absent, if not very much lacking in amount. In this way, the colonel and his wife are two very different people. It is surprising that these two characters are married given their contrasting degrees of general optimism and it is even more surprising that she has tolerated her husband’s illusionary optimism for the arrival of his pension for a staggering fifteen years. Thusly, the wife’s realistic nature and unwillingness to be as optimistic as her husband prevents her from liking the cockerel since she cannot look

Open Document