Freedom In Fahrenheit 451

In order to preserve the structure of humanity, people must have freedom of expression, free will, and equality. Any attempt to create an utopia must respect, honor, and nourish these human needs; for without them the society will eventually become a dystopia. An analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and The Giver by Lois Lowry, proves that any social structure that hopes to achieve utopia must insure that the citizens have their basic needs met, opportunities to pursue personal goals and dreams, and freedom to be unique.

In order to maintain the aspect of humanity, people must have free will so that they can do what they please as long as they do not interfere with others’ lives in ways that are inhumane. In Fahrenheit 451, the society is built so that citizens cannot get access to books that have

In The Giver, people were not allowed to change their schedules and express themselves. "How could someone not fit it? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made." (Lois Lowry, page 47). Everyone took part in the community, but nobody was allowed to express themselves differently, which made the society a dystopia. Fahrenheit 451 did not strictly disallow expression, however, it lacked freedom of expression, as the people were "dumbed down" by the lack of books and the society’s system.

For one to maintain the essence of humanity, people must also have equality. Equality is necessary so that everyone can be unique and different. If one did has freedom, the society will become a dystopia. In Fahrenheit 451, people were equal, but many people did not have equal rights because the government planned to eliminate the people who thought differently. The Giver also had a distorted form of equality because people were not allowed to be free unless they were in very high positions in the government, and the normal people could only do certain