Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The participation of African Americans in the civil war
Participation of African Americans during war
The role of black people during the American civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The War Between the States was full of atrocities that Americans had not
experienced before. One incident that stirred up the Union occurred at Fort Pillow,
Tennessee. The numbers of those who perished at Fort Pillow were relatively small
compared to battles such as that at Fort Donelson where casualties numbered
17,398.1 The total dead after Confederate forces took Fort Pillow over was more than
half of the Union soldiers, the majority of them being black. The high death rate
caused Union officials to call it an outright massacre. Was it a massacre or a result of
war?
The battle that came under scrutiny occurred about forty miles from Memphis on
the Tennessee side of the Mississippi River at Fort Pillow. The Union continued to
maintain garrisons all over the south due to Confederate raiders, though most of the
fighting was then focused in Georgia, with an eye on the taking of Atlanta. Those
involved in the battle at Fort Pillow and the result of the fight there came under scrutiny
of the United States Congress with controversial results.
Union forces at Fort Pillow were under the command of Major Lionel F. Booth
who had been a member of the regular army before the outbreak of the war. During the
battle between Booth’s troops within the fort and those of the attacking Confederate
troops, command of the fort came under Major William Bradford. Major Bradford took
charge when Major Booth was killed by a sharpshooter as he was making rounds and
giving encouragement to his troops.
General Nathan Bedford Forrest, a cavalry commander from the state of
Tennessee, was in command of the Confederate troops that attacked Fort Pillow. He had
been in the area...
... middle of paper ...
...rved for the Union that the United States
Congress was forced to make inquiries into the event. After an investigation that
contained both personal and written testimony, Congress’ final decision of the incident
did nothing to change what occurred in the minds of the families of the slain and Union
forces that took up the rally cry, “Remember Fort Pillow” as they charged into battle.
Works Cited
1 http://www.nps.gov/hps/abpp/battles/tn002.htm
2 General Thomas Jordan and J.P. Pryor, Campaigns of General Nathan Bedford Forrest and of Forrest’s Cavalry (New York: Da Capo Press, 1996), 422, 423
3 http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/abpp/battles/tn030.htm
4 Robert Selph Henry, Nathan Bedford Forrest First with the Most, (New York: Konecky and Konecky, 1992), 250.
5 http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/abpp/battles/tn030.htm
6 Jordan and Pryor, 424, 425
The award-winning novel by Stephen Ambrose, Band of Brothers: Easy Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest, discusses one of the greatest examples of mission command in the form of 1st Lieutenant Richard Winters and his role in the Brecourt Manor Assault. This battle is a textbook example of how to fight against a superior enemy force that outnumbered the unit by four times as much. Facing overwhelming odds with just 16 paratroopers against over 60 German Soldiers, 1LT Winters nevertheless prevails and succeeds in achieving his objective while minimizing casualties to just three Soldiers lost. Looking back further into the American Revolution, the Battle of Bunker Hill on the American side is one of the earliest examples of Mission Command under the command of COL William Prescott.
Stewart R. W. (2005). American Military History (Vol. 1). The United States Army and the
Stationed at the fort at that time were many men who would later become well known in the Army: Colonel W. B. Royall, commanding officer of the fort and the 4th Cavalry, who was responsible for the logistical support of the Geronimo campaign; Leonard Wood, who went along on the expedition as contract surgeon; Lieutenant Colonel G. H. Forsyht; Captain C.A.P. Hatfield; Captain J.H. Dorst; and First Lieutenant Powhatan H. Clarke, who was immortalized by the artist, Remington, for saving a black trooper during the campaign.
McDonough, James L., and Thomas L. Connelly. Five Tragic Hours: The Battle of Franklin. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1983. ISBN 978-0-87049-396-6.
... on the south and southwest corner of Fort Pulaski. Federal army faced a few setbacks, but nothing major. They continued to fire throughout the night until the morning. The continuous fire breached the walls of the fort, causing the Fort commander Colonel Olmstead to surrender.
September 16-18, 1862, outside of the town of Sharpsburg, Maryland, between the Potomac River and Antietam Creek, was the location of the bloodiest battle in American history. Confederate Colonel Stephen D. Lee described it as “Artillery Hell” because of the frightful toll on his gunners and horses from Federal counter battery and infantry fire. (AotW, 2014) The battle of Antietam, or the Battle of Sharpsburg, would collect an estimated 23,100 total casualties (Luvaas and Nelson, 1987). The body count far exceeded any of the other three battles waged in the Maryland Campaign (Harpers Ferry, South Mountain, and Shepherdstown). This battle was a contributing factor in the outcome of our country and the rest of the world. The Union Army desperately needed a victory at Antietam; however, a victory for the Confederate rebels may have very well gained them international recognition as a sovereign country in the eyes of the rest of the world. The Federal Army, which belonged to the Union States, consisted of an all-volunteer army and was a larger army than the Confederate States. Even though the Battle of Antietam was inconclusive, President Lincoln went on to read the Emancipation Proclamation to the country, effectively ending slavery, and ensuring that no foreign nation would intervene on the Confederates behave.
Trudeau, Noah Andre. Gettysburg A Testing of Courage. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc, 2002. Page 268.
African Americans were very questionable at first in the Civil War. The Union Navy had been already been accepting African American volunteers. Frederick Douglass thought that the military would help the African Americans have equal rights if they fought with them. Many children helped in the Civil War also, no matter how old they were. Because the African Americans were unfavorable, black units were not used in combat as they might have been. Nevertheless, the African Americans fought in numerous battles. African Americans fought gallantly. Northern leaders also saw another reason to have African Americans in the Civil War is that the Union needed soldiers. Congress aloud them to enlist them because they thought they might as well have more soldiers.
On March 1, 1864, a man with a battle record that few could imagine began planning to recruit troops and mounts from West Kentucky. This man fought at battles such as Fort Donelson and Shiloh. He also served under General Bragg and General Sooy Smith. He is none other than General Nathan Bedford Forrest. (herein referred to as Forrest).
impoverished whites in the Southern States and the District of Columbia. The war had liberated
The battle of Fort Pillow took place in Lauderdale County, Tennessee on April 12th 1864 at the Union fort named Fort Pillow. The Confederates previously controlled the fort but due to the pressing Union army, they had to abandon the fort in fear of being broken off from the Confederate Army. During March of the same year, Nathan Bedford Forrest launched a cavalry raid on Kentucky and Western Tennessee. During this month long cavalry raid Forrest and he squadron had lost many supplies and horses, "There is a Federal force of 500 or 600 at Fort Pillow, which I shall attend to in a day or two, as they have horses and supplies which we need," in this quote we see the initial cause for his attack is strictly for the supplies. This applies proof that Forrest did not go into fort pillow looking for a massacre.
Stephen W. Sears’ Landscape Turned Red is an account of political and military plans. Especially General Robert E. Lee’s Maryland Campaign as well as the Battle of Antietam. Sears frames his work around the pending support of Great Britain and France to the Confederate cause due to cotton. Landscape Turned Red covers the battle of Antietam. It offers a vivid account of both armies, the soldiers and officers, and the bloody campaign. It analyzes the impact of Antietam on the Civil War as a whole. Sears' use of diaries, dispatches, and letters recreate the Battle of Antietam. You experience the battle not only from its leaders but also by its soldiers, both Union and Confederate. Sears attempts to examine the tactical moves of both Lee and General George McClellan. He also talks about the foolish decisions that troubled both the Federal and Confederate forces. Sears' use of traits, political pursuits, and tactical preferences, explain the thoughts of many. Some of these include President Lincoln, General Halleck and General McClellan, and their subordinates. Stephen Ward Sears is an American historian specializing in the American Civil War. He is a graduate of Oberlin College and an attendant to a journalism seminar at Radcliffe-Harvard. As an author he has concentrated on the military history of the American Civil War. Such as the battles and leaders of the Army of the Potomac. He was an editor for the Educational Department at American Heritage Publishing Company. American Heritage Publishing two of his ten books.
... to a miscommunication between the Captain and his soldiers. If the crowd had not been in such an uproar the Boston Massacre never would have happened. With all the testimony and the deposition from the Captain, the jury made the correct decision by determining Preston innocent.
- - -, ed. "The Anti-War Movement in the United States." English.Illnois.edu. Ed. Oxford Companion to American Military History. 1st ed. Vers. 1. Rev. 1. Oxford Companion to American Military History, 1999. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. .