Food Label's Ugly Secrets Analysis

787 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Six important of food labelling

If you were to pick up a packaged food in the grocery store, wouldn’t you want to have a label to know how much sugar was imported into the product? The FDA has put forth a proposal that would add that label, but some companies don’t think it would be necessary. I envisage that the homogenous human being’s governmental system should make rules about labeling foods with added sugar. The homogenous human being’s governmental system needs to add food labels because this would help consumers know how much sugar they are consuming into their consumptional bodies, and this would also make companies lower sugar to make more sales. As I said, this label would tell consumers how much extra sugar was put into the product they were wanting …show more content…

This supports the FDA’s proposal because it lures the consumers to their side, because you wouldn’t want to be on the side that would lie to you about their products? To support this claim, here’s an excerpt from the article, “Food Label’s Reveal Sugar’s Ugly Secrets”, “Nutrition advocates say the uproar only supports their argument that unhealthy amounts of sugar are secretly added to foods.” This also helps the FDA’s proposal because dieticians might recommend a product to their viewers, but their viewers wouldn’t know how much added sugar was in the product, thus only harming the consumer. Although, if the product had a label to tell the dietitian how much added unhealthy amounts of sugar were in the product, they could advise their viewers to steer clear of those products. If you were a food company, and the government passed the FDA’s proposal, wouldn’t you lower sugar in your product to boost …show more content…

With companies lowering sugar in their product to further introduce sales, this can lower obese American amounts. With the label being added it could help relieve the American obesity rate, thus helping consumers.To credit this here’s an excerpt from the article “Food Label’s Reveal Sugar’s Ugly Secrets”, “But for advocacy groups, the aim is to get companies to lower the sugar content of their products.” With this, the label would not only help Americans, but it would make companies lower sugar content in their product to make

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Of Obesity In The Film 'Fed Up'

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, the outcome was different from his desired result due to strong protest from the dairy and livestock industry, so the Congress instead urged people to buy lean meat and less fat food so the dairy and livestock industry do not go out of business. This created the fat-free boom in the market in the 1980s. However, food companies began to put more sugar in their products because the taste was bad when they reduced fat in the food. Now, the sugar intake of Americans has doubled compared with before. In the American market, there are approximately 600,000 different food products, and 80% of those include sugar. Although sugar is written in various forms and names, one suggests that it’s bad in any form, especially if taken too much. Sugar consumed naturally through fiber-rich fruit or vegetable should be fine, but the added sweeteners stimulate the hormones that increase insulin. High insulin prevents people from thinking they are full, and thus crave more food. This causes many diseases. Of course one meal high in sugar will not kill them, but the problem is that people generally exceed daily sugar intake in one meal alone when consuming process food. We eat more processed and convenient food instead of fruits, vegetables, and

    Read More

  • GMO Labeling Essay

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    A non-GMO label doesn’t necessarily mean “healthy”. White sugar, flour, and processed ingredients if not genetically modified are considered non GMO. Recently Cheerios made their ingredients GMO free. This label made Cheerios seems as a “healthy conscience choice” when in fact they are not healthy at all. The truth is that this breakfast cereal is highly processed and is best to be avoided despite the “healthy halo” of being approved by the National Heart Association and GMO free. The truth appears on the nutrition label and the ingredients (Wartman). “If you can’t pronounce it, don’t buy it” The voluntary labeling places a burden on the consumer. The average Americans are forced to navigate confusing and cluttered food landscape” (Wartman). A mandatory labeling law is vital to give clear and concise information to citizens.

    Read More

  • The Extraordinary Science Of Addictive Junk Food Essay

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    The sole purpose of a company is to offer goods and services while making a profit. If people have a liking for food products with so many unhealthy items and are willing to buy them, the companies have no obligation to reduce the amount of added ingredients. The companies aren’t the ones forcing the public to overeat. However, these companies shouldn’t market their products to people who they can easily exploit, like children and those who are penurious. Michael Moss, author of the article “The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food” interviews several people who worked for certain big brand companies and gives us an abundant amount of information on how the food companies make and market their food to “get us hooked”.

    Read More

  • Obesity and the Food Industry

    1914 Words  | 4 Pages

    Obesity has reached epidemic proportions globally with at least 2.8 million people dying annually as a result (World Health Organization). Among others, the food industry, governments and the private sector, all have vital roles to play in contributing to obesity prevention or more controversially, obesity continuation. These groups have the power to govern the constitutional elements of consumption, distribution, inspection, regulation, control and production of food. Competition within the industry is inevitable as it strives to supply food in a staggering abundance, at such a low-cost and without regard to geography or season. These high production rates have spawned powerful conglomerates as companies have merged to increase overall influence and reduce competition. In order to safeguard these positions, issues of regulation and conflict of interests manifest themselves in questionable industry funded food research centered on potential health benefits of their products (Sharma); these are conducted by government organizations responsible for promoting healthy eating habits but are funded by food manufacturers. They attempt to provide scientific proof in order to lobby the government to ensure a sympathetic legal framework to influence the implementation of nutritional policies. This repeatedly indicates that business interests are winning out over health concerns. Innumerable resources have been expended to develop and market products that are guaranteed to sell regardless of the global “eat less” message. In this essay I will explore how the food industry is promoting an environment in which the net result is an increase in body weight.

    Read More

  • Junk Science by Lee Ann Fisher Baron

    1609 Words  | 4 Pages

    Pomeranz, Jennifer L. "A Comprehensive Strategy To Overhaul FDA Authority For Misleading Food Labels." American Journal Of Law & Medicine 39.4 (2013): 617-647. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.

    Read More

  • Food Labeling

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    Food claims seemed to be marketing for a manufacturer, but now it is a warning to a consumer's health. Some examples of claims are "low-fat", "lite", "light", "reduced", "%fat free" and "No added". The food industry is very keen to make health claims on food labels, and the ANZFA has considered lifting the ban that stops them from doing so. Many disagreeable claims are made regarding the ability of nutrients to prevent certain diseases. Food manufacturers are now only allowed to make the following well-established claims concerning relationships between diet and disease:

    Read More

  • Healthy Lunches Research

    332 Words  | 1 Pages

    I know that research shows that when such information is available about one-quarter of coustomers use it to limit what we decide to eat. The customers consume an average of 400 fewer calories than they typically did prior to labeling.They should start by making an obvious point one that both sides should agree on one healthy person is equation is of course fitness and that

    Read More

  • Food Labelling Case Study

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    Food labelling laws make sure consumers get vital information about the foods they consume. Food businesses must label their food products legally and correctly. The overall aim of the food labelling regulations is to ensure that customers can make informed choices in relation to the food they consume, as well as to prevent any practices that may mislead the customer. It is required by law to have these items on labels:

    Read More

  • Mcdonald's Food Labeling Case Study

    1424 Words  | 3 Pages

    This case focuses on McDonald’s Corp.’s Happy Meal that consists of an entrée, a small order of french fries, a small drink, and a toy. McDonald’s started to direct their marketing of the Happy Meal to children between the ages of one to three in the early 1990’s. Later in 1995, McDonald’s released documents known as “McDonald’s Nutrition Facts” that made the nutritional information for its foods products available. While each document provided a list of food items with a nutritional breakdown that the restaurant serves the Happy Meal was not included amongst the documents. Alleging, among other things, that McDonald’s had violated state laws prohibiting consumer fraud and deceptive business practices by failing to adhere to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990, Marc Cohen Filed a suit in an Illinois state court. There are definite requirements for products specifically intended for children under the age of four set out

    Read More

  • Misleading Food Labels

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ly look at the false claims made by food industries expand on their already set regulations, making it harder for companies to get around them. However, if the FDA believes that their regulations are as specific as they can get, then there should be at least somebody to educate consumers about food labels and add more detail to nutritional value charts. Because without changing the way how information is provided and educating people, they will not be able to change their diets to improve nations overall health.

    Read More

  • Food Politics

    1489 Words  | 3 Pages

    For over a century, the government has been give us nutrition advice, telling us what we should or shouldn’t eat to stay healthy. Marion Nestles argument in her book, Food Politics, shows a corruption in the relationship between the government, principally the USDA through its dietary recommendations, the US Farm bill, and the food industry. The problem, says Marion Nestle, is that our diets are a political issue, because dietary advice affects food sales. Accordingly, corporate food companies use their relationships with people in the government, and science to push their product as a healthy choice. In other words, when it comes to consumption of food, strategic decisions are driven by economics; science, common sense, and health have very little to do with it. This explains why the food pyramid/plate has changed a number of times over the past century. It’s been influenced by the corporate food companies to drive sales. An example of this is given in chapter two of Food Politics, where the recently appointed Secretary of the U.S Department of Agriculture blocked the printing of the department’s latest food guide—the eating right pyramid. The reason for this was that the pyramid advised a dietary pattern in which people should eat more grains, fruits and vegetables, with a reduction in dairy and meat products, and even less consumption of foods high in fat and sugar. Accordingly, it’s no surprise that companies in the meat and dairy industry used their influence to prevent such a food guide from coming out. As you can see, there is a correlation between dietary advice and sales in the food industry, and therefore, corruption is inevitable.

    Read More

  • Food Assumptions: Everything the Food Industry Does Not Want Consumers to Know

    1046 Words  | 3 Pages

    People often take in information without thinking about what it means or how valid it is. People also tend to consume food and beverages without thinking where it came from or how it was produced. The well-known saying, “do not believe everything you see and hear” is something more people should consider more often when thinking about the production and consumption of food in America. The American public is misinformed on many topics in the food industry. This can be compared to the message that the book, Lies My Teacher Told Me, by James Loewen, delivers about how the public is deceived in regards to history. One specific food lie is how the Corn Refiners Association wants the public to believe that High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) is the same as sugar and is perfectly healthy for consumption. As some research suggests, this is a faulty food assumption.

    Read More

  • Food Inc Reaction Paper

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Food labels are supposed to tell us exactly what’s in the foods we consume but we don’t know where those things come from. I think that food labels should state exactly where and what companies provided the ingredients in the foods on the food labels. If we knew exactly what we were eating we could prevent each other from getting sick from the foods. The government will never release exactly what we are eating because they’re are gaining too much money when they keep things kept a secret but; too many people are getting sick from these foods we need to be able to prevent ourselves from getting

    Read More

  • Fast Pace : A Fast Paced Nation

    1068 Words  | 3 Pages

    In a fast paced nation, we want everything at hand’s reach meaning fast results and easy work. This need for a fast pace relates to various areas in our lives, especially dealing with basic health. It may sound ridiculous when you read an article on how great the newest “cotton ball diet” worked or how easy and fast it is but to others they find it as a comforting new way to lose weight. About two thirds, “68.9%”(Ogden) to be exact, of Americans are obese or overweight. With such a high epidemic, naturally people want to change factors that are completely curable. Though the thought is slightly in the right place, big advertisers use this fact to sell more foods, diets or anything they can throw at you by pretending to help. Advertisers can get away with saying something is healthy, even if it is not. These advertisers get away with false advertising by using sneaky misleading language that goes about describing “healthy” foods and diets. They create food friends and foes and tweaking what is presented on a the label. They play upon American consumer’s want to be healthier. There are more diets being introduced into the country, yet people are getting bigger every year. Advertisers should take a step back and rationalize what they are truly selling to a consumer. If something does not guarantee weight loss or any health benefit then do not advertise it does so. This is where regulations from the government would come in handy. If the government could just place more regulations on what is okay and what is not okay with how food advertisers promote their foods, this would help shoppers, especially those health conscious purchase what is right. Almost a decade ago, “Congress passed a law that overhauled food labels and required comp...

    Read More

  • Fast Food and the Government

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...and have to take responsibility for our actions. It is reasonable to assume that once we are provided with the right information, we will begin to take more responsibility and make better choices, and in response, the fast food companies will adjust as needed. While some might argue that even this is too burdensome for the fast food industry, I would argue that a proper balance must be struck between allowing the current state to continue unchecked and imposing improper and onerous government regulations. As a result, an appropriate role for the government is to ensure that consumers have all the information necessary to make informed decisions. A labeling requirement would accomplish this goal while imposing only a minimal burden on business owners and, most importantly, leaving the ultimate menu choices where they belong, in the hands of individual Americans.

    Read More

More about Food Label's Ugly Secrets Analysis

Open Document