Document 1 relates to Document 2 not necessarily through the content, as #1 discusses the punishment for anyone who opposes the U.S.
Government through actions, and #2 discusses the fate of alien enemies in the U.S., but through their idea, and the motive for writing such laws. Both appear to be extreme precautions and safety measures, in an attempt to eliminate threats and prevent disasters, to the extent that even First Amendment rights are taken away. Both documents highlight how such events would take place, detailing certain things such as who is involved, what the crimes and the intents are, and the role of the court, as well as what rights those who are convicted have. The two documents also represent how the 3 branches of the US government are almost acting
…show more content…
However,
Document 3 deems such actions as unconstitutional, arguing that the unification of the 3 branches of government to create such a law is exactly what will turn the U.S. Government into a monarchy, and that such a law infringes on the rights granted to individuals through the
First Amendment. Document 2 does not directly relate to Document 3 directly, as they both discuss different things, but the ideas bear resemblance to the relation between Documents 1 and 3. Document 2 again is a breach of the rights granted to those living within the United States, such as how individuals can be apprehended simply for their ethnicity, rather than for their actions. Document 3, although being a challenge to the laws declared in Document 1, highlights the idea that the 3 branches of government cannot consolidate to declare such laws and to oppose the rights granted to individuals by the Bill of Rights, ideas that also apply to Document 2. Documents 1 and 2 both relate to Document 4 in a similar manner. Both
#1 and #2 detail laws that are deemed unconstitutional, infringing
In America the Amendment 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives the American people the right to peaceably assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Most notably Amendment 1 is known for and most often cited as giving the Freedom of Speech. Even before this amendment was ratified people in the U.S. were protesting, as in the Boston Tea Party. Protesting has been a way to effect change in America. A question to ask is this: is there a right way or wrong way to protest.
The U.S. Constitution and the Texas Constitution have similarities and differences. First, both constitutions consist of a Bill of Rights. This is a formal summary of the rights and liberties considered essential to a people or group of people. The individual rights provide a variety of restraints on political power to protect people against unwarranted intrusions and abuses. Also, in both constitutions it outlines and talks about the powers of government in each separate department. Both talk about suffrage, taxation and revenue, along with general provisions, and modes of amending the c...
The United States' Constitution is one the most heralded documents in our nation's history. It is also the most copied Constitution in the world. Many nations have taken the ideals and values from our Constitution and instilled them in their own. It is amazing to think that after 200 years, it still holds relevance to our nation's politics and procedures. However, regardless of how important this document is to our government, the operation remains time consuming and ineffective. The U.S. Constitution established an inefficient system that encourages careful deliberation between government factions representing different and sometimes competing interests.
The following paragraphs will discuss the differences between these two legal documents.
The constitution guarded against tyranny using federalism. [Federalism is the system where the states and central government share power.] [Document A was written by James
Document D openly shows the little power that the national government is in control of. In the document, the U.S. attempted to remove British troops off of U.S. soil and had quite a time trying to do so. The British had no respect for the U.S. government because of the little power it had, all of the power was in the hands of the states. The thirteen states acted like thirteen separate nations as they, for the most part, functioned as they pleased.
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
The First Amendment is what we chose because it covers good areas (topics) that are occurring in the world on a daily basis. Many people like the items that The First Amendment covers, and some people don't like them. Either way there are many other amendments that have been ratified by the two-thirds of the House and Senate. There are ten amendments in the constitution, but there are 17 other amendments that aren't in the constitution. Therefore, in total there are 27 amendments.
The eighth amendment states that no person shall be submitted to cruel and unusual punishment. The question is whether or not this right is under attack from those who support the death penalty. When the bill of rights was created it was intended to stop judges from unruly, and unreasonable punishments of people who committed certain crimes. However in the day and age we live in now, the supreme court has placed provisions and rules on the use of the death penalty, and with its support it is threatening the idea of the eighth amendment, and those who oppose it.
Some examples of these are indicated in Document A. It describes that the central government can, “regulate trade, conduct foreign relations and declare war.” Meanwhile, the states can, “set up local governments, hold elections and establish schools.” As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What James Madison is trying to say is that the central and state governments have enough power that they don’t control everything. The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude, that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents tyranny. The first guard against tyranny was Federalism, which means a system of government in which power is divided between a federal government and state government. The guard of federalism shows one way in the constitution when they set up the compound government to make sure that the federal government doesn’t get too much power. The second way is when some responsibilities are given to the state government so that they can share the power equally. Federalism protects against tyranny because it ensures that the federal government doesn’t have too much say in
A third way that our constitution guards against tyranny is with checks and balances. Checks and balances are ways for one of the three branches to stop one of the other branches from doing something that isn’t right. For one example of many, in Doc C, it says that the Legislative branch can can veto the president (executive branch) after he (or she) votes on a law. This protects against tyranny because if one of the branches does something bad, the other branches have ways to stop
The United States of America is one of the most powerful nation-states in the world today. The framers of the American Constitution spent a great deal of time and effort into making sure this power wasn’t too centralized in one aspect of the government. They created three branches of government to help maintain a checks and balance system. In this paper I will discuss these three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, for both the state and federal level.
Students’ rights in schools are limited or just taken away. Kids are forced to do whatever the officials at their school, either the principal or the teachers, tell the students to do. One of the main right that gets taken away or limited is students’ first amendment rights, which is the freedom of expression. Students can gets suspended by just doing things the staff at the school does not like, including saying things that they don 't like or supporting a religion that the school does not support. Also, if something is said about the school or the people attending the school is said on social media that student can also get in a lot of trouble. Students should be able to have more first amendment
As stated in the first paper; The Constitution of the United States was designed to be a framework for the organization of our country’s government. Many foreign countries also have constitutions, which outline the rights of individuals and the powers of the law; such as the Iraqi Constitution of 2005. I will compare the similarities and differences of the US and Iraqi Constitutions and discuss Articles 2, 36, 39, & 90 and women’s rights of the Iraqi Constitution.
...our privacy in our homes, effects, paper, and activities, which is needed for an individual in their every day lives. It helps the law to put an end to criminal activities and to bring an end to the war on drugs and human smuggling, and many other serious crimes that happen every day in the United States. It also helps society to have peace of mind, knowing that they have the right to privacy in their own home, as long as the law is abided and the judicial system upholds the constitution, this right will always be aiding the fair and just side of the law side of the law. Society has the right to be protected from all criminal behavior, ever since the constitution was first created society has had this right, but the means used to restrict and control this criminal activity must be lawful and constitutional, and the fourth amendment helps us to guarantee this right!