Figurative Language In Anderson's Chains

467 Words1 Page

In a book ripe with figurative language, it can be only expected that the author wouldn’t skimp on the rest of the book. This is certainly the case with Anderson’s book Chains. A series of transformational events can be found throughout the book pertaining to many different characters. Isabel is initially confused as to why she is not being freed, and by the end of the book has transformed into a freedom seeking insolent girl. However, a person must interact in order to be transformed, and she heavily interacts with her evil master, and friendly “boy [who] wore a floppy red hat…][27] ”The best time to talk to ghosts is just before the sun comes up. That’s when they can hear us true, Momma said that that’s when ghosts can answer us.”[1] Despite the obvious scientific inaccuracy, the idea of ghosts is very important for a person going through tough times, especially when ones family members have died. This is because it establishes permanence in that person; they are no longer merely a body that lies six feet underground but rather a spirit watching down from the sky. In Isabel’s case, it establishes comfort in the sense that her mother is protecting her, because her mother would never let anything bad happen to her. However, it is slightly symbolic that “ghosts couldn’t move …show more content…

Curzon is the first potential benefactor to this due to his relations to the rebel army currently occupying New York. Following his request of being a snitch in the loyalist household of her master, off the assumption that she can get a good reputation with the rebels and then be freed on behalf of them. She finds that her master is plotting an assassination of the rebel leader, George Washington. She is granted access to the local rebel camp,

Open Document