Fahrenheit 9/11 Essay

705 Words2 Pages

Fahrenheit 9/11 is Michael Moore’s interpretation of what happened on September 11th 2001. When the film was first released in 2004, America was still at war, and the Bush administration still has the majority of the citizens support. Despite this, the film found a lot of success due to his narrative strategies. By making the film a documentary, Moore establishes a sense of credibility with his audience so he can begin to promote his own political ideology. The film begins by asking if Bush’s defeat of Al Gore was all just a dream. He carefully chooses his scenes and cuts his shots together in a way that depicts the media as unreliable and the election as unfair. He attempts to get the audience into a skeptical mindset in which they doubt the validity of the political system. One of the most intense points in the film is when there is no footage at all. After labeling Bush as a “lame duck” president, the movie cuts to black and a powerful series of sounds begins playing that are instantly recognizable as the noises that represent 9/11. By relaying the sounds people crying and screaming, roaring sirens, news reports on the world trade center being hit, and booming …show more content…

The film introduces the fact that Bush was on the board of a company which had millions to gain from going to war, and had several large Saudi investors. Among these investors were the Bin Laden family, who has close personal and business ties with the Bush family. Moore asks the viewers to consider whether Bush’s interests sided with the American people, or with business. Moore also questions why there is such a large amount of protection at the Saudi foreign embassy in the United States. This thought segways into the idea that the Saudis were behind the 9/11 attack and that Bush acted favorably on their behalf, despite it being at the expense of the American

More about Fahrenheit 9/11 Essay

Open Document