Factual Allegation Evidence Ms. Munster’s kitchen pipe burst, causing a flood. The apartment had flooded in January 3rd, 2016, and the damage was discovered on January 9th, 2016. Ms. Munster took photos of her apartment, which can be presented as evidence to prove that ABC Apartment’s Inc. was in contravention of section 20(1) of the Residential Tenancy Act. ABC Apartment’s Inc owes Ms. Munster $950.00 for the hotel and laundry services. After the flood was discovered, Ms. Munster was forced to find alternative living accommodations at a hotel for four weeks. In addition, she also paid for laundry services during the four weeks. The receipts Ms. Munster has can be used as evidence to verify that she spent $1,200.00 on the hotel and laundry …show more content…
Munster incurred $2,500.00 worth of property damage due to the flood in her apartment. On February 8th, 2016, Ms. Munster returned to her apartment and discovered that her furniture, clothes and electronic equipment had been damaged. There is evidence that the total cost of the damaged property is $2,500.00. Ms. Munster can present the receipts she still has for the furniture and electronic equipment. The flood caused mold damage in Ms. Munster’s kitchen. The flood that started in Ms. Munster’s kitchen most likely caused the mold damage. Ms. Munster took photos of the mold, which can be presented as evidence. Furthermore, Ms. Munster can offer testimony that she reported the damage to her superintendent on February 19th, 2016. Also, a trained mold expert, from the Enforcement and By-Law Services Division, came to Ms. Munster’s apartment to file a Property Standards Report. The report, as well as the Property Standards Officer’s testimony, can verify that there was mold damage in the kitchen. Ms. Munster’s apartment had an ant infestation. ABC Apartments Inc owes Ms. Munster $350.00 for hiring an exterminator. The Property Standards Inspection Report can also be relied on for proving that Ms. Munster’s apartment had an ant infestation. Ms. Munster was forced to pay a pest control company $350.00 to exterminate the ants found in the apartment. Therefore, Ms. Munster would be able to provide an invoice from the pest control company as
Doris Reed bought a house for $76,000.00 from Robert King. Mr. King and his real estate agent failed to disclose to Mrs. Reed that a murder had taken place in the home ten years ago. Neighbors told Mrs. Reed about the murders and the stigma associated with the house after she moved in. The property appraised in the amount of $65,000.00 with reference to the history of the house. Reed sued King on allegations of misrepresentation for the purchase of the home seeking rescission and damages to terminate the contact.
a) Given that Eva and Maria entered a written contract supported by a legal document for a price agreed on $75,000 for rendering decorating services, there is consideration. Both parties agree upon a price and this contract verifies validity.
Primrose claimed about the incident at Wal-Mart Stores, INC., that they were trying to cause any kind of harm to her. Based on the evidence that had been provided to the court have proved that the signs was clear enough to be seen by everyone around the area at that time. Moreover, Wal-Mart did not asking her to go around the display in order for her to transported the watermelon. The Judges thinks that the incident would not happened if Ms.Primrose can move her shopping cart closer so it would be easier for her to transferred the watermelon. Therefore, the Judges are agreed with the trial court’s decision to grant the defendant their motion for summary judgment, after it had been proven that the display was open and obvious to be seen by everyone and there’s no sign of any risk or mean to harm anyone. Also, Ms. Primrose was failed to prove her’s argues that she claimed above to support her liability to La. R.S. 9:2800.6, the Judges cannot impose any enforcement or duty upon the defendant. In conclusion, the three assignments of error cannot be
This is a complex case, involving multiple parties and several variables that need to be examined thoroughly. The parties mentioned include Knarles operator of the facility maintenance company, his son Barkley, their employee, a licensed plumber, and Mr. Chetum. Although in the end Chetum is suing the facilities maintenance firm for a breach of contract, all factors must be examined to determine proper fault.
La Trobe Capital & Mortgage Corp Ltd v Hay Property Consultants Pty Ltd (2011) 190 FCR 299
The play “Doubt” by John Patrick Shanley began with a sermon by Father Brendan Flynn, a well liked and enlightened neighborhood priest, who says, "Doubt can be a bond as powerful and sustaining as certainty". (Shanley 6) Sister Aloysius Beauvier is a strict traditional nun, who was declared to protect and secure St. Nicholas Church School. Father Flynn seems to be the protagonist in the play and Sister Aloysius is the antagonist. The whole play, sister Aloysius Beauvier suspected Father Flynn of molesting a 12-year-old boy named Donald Muller, who is the first African-American student in the St. Nicholas Church School. I think that Sister Aloysius’s overreacting, because Father Flynn is innocent. In the middle of these two characters, Sister James is a young and innocent teacher who wants to be neutral between the conflict of Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn.
Miss Minnie’s would like to sue the meteorologist who reported sunny skies with only a 20 percent chance of rain. She relies on the meteorologist to give her an accurate forecast. She carefully notes the weather reports and dresses accordingly. It was the inaccurate reading of the meteorologist who caused Miss Minnie to ruin her new outfit and her to pneumonia. Miss Minnie arrived ten minutes early for the bus to arrive and in that ten minutes, she got drenched by a rain cloud. Now if the meteorologist would have been more accurate with his weather forecast Miss Minnie wouldn’t need to sue him for negligence. She would have brought and umbrella and been able to celebrate with her friends at the early bird dinner.
Problem: Norma has been a “doll” all her life. She has taken on others problems and kept her thoughts and feelings all to herself. It is now time for Norma to explain herself and deal with the facts. Norma forged her father’s signature on an I.O.U for two hundred and fifty pounds. She tries to do anything she can so her husband will not find out. Her husband just received a job at the bank; therefore, he could easily find out about the fo...
LEGAL UPDATE: client continues to report ongoing lawsuit against Women's Shelter due to a shoulder injury she sustained while residing at the previous shelter. Client reported she doesn’t have any update information concerning her case disposition.
An open lap top computer sat on the battered, pock-marked, oak finished coffee table, the worn black vinyl couch and its matching recliner were lined up in front of a large flat screen television. She'd seen worse. It
To put the house out of reach of Jones, he bought a company "off the shelf" and conveyed the house to it. In an action against Lipman and the company, the court granted the specific performance and ruled that "the defendant company is the creature of the first defendant, a device and ...
When it came to Ms. Hunter and restocking the store, she did not want to take the easy route. Ms. Hunter put in the extra hours to go to Sam’s Club and pick up the product to make as big of a profit as possible. She also ordered from Vistar, a concessions company, what we couldn’t get at Sam’s Club. However, Mrs. Harvey ordered everything from Vistar because everything was delivered to the school. The products at Vistar were more expensive, which meant that we had to raise prices of the products we sold. With both teachers, we had raised a significant amount of money for the program. The instructor was the one who would decide what to do with the
What occurred in this case was that in a new build factory there had been inoperative flooring set and the claimants in this case lost money due to the flooring having to be reset again. In this case the claimants were in contract with the builders who laid the floor but decided not to sue them but to sue the sub contractors for their negligence because they were present when the builders and claimants were at meetings when discussing the flooring. Similarly, to the case Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] the court allowed the claimants to sue the defendants for their financial
In the case of Yaxley v Gotts (2000) ch 162, the defendant, Gotts bought a building to Yaxley, a self employed builder and instead agreed him to have the bottom floor for renovating the other flats. Later, Yaxley argued that an oral statement had been made between them to reward him with ownership of the ground floor of the building, which Gotts failed to convey the title deeds in the name of Yaxley. The judge later found an oral contract had been made and permitted Yaxley, the plaintiff, to have the ownership in the form of a 99-year lease. The appeal court stated that the doctrine of estoppel should operate to modify the effect of the section 2 of the 1989 Act.
to pay a $20 fee for any Flix2You property that is reported to be disoriented, purloined, or is not returned