Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer

746 Words2 Pages

One unfortunate part of the human experience is trauma. It’s inevitable, inherently common and completely complicated. As with many things in life, many people turn to literature in hopes of finding a magic remedy for a traumatic event, some step-by-step process for how they’re supposed to react, or, at the very least, a character who makes them feel less alone. There are a lot of books that are misleading and useless, but there are some in the most unlikely places that offer the soundest sympathy and the best company. One such novel is Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer. The novel has a relatable representation of the chaos and destruction that surrounds traumatic events, which is enhanced by the novel’s use of historical truth, within three main characters that represented three very different stages of grief.
It’s important to examine how Foer is able to accurately represent trauma in his story, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. Todd Atchinson states, “Trauma literature depicts a survivor’s personal struggle in responding to and representing the mass atrocities suffered through the threats to individual, cultural and inhuman eradication.” Breaking that down, he is arguing that trauma literature like Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close attempt to follow a person’s journey to redefine themselves after facing a tragedy that as threatened their individual and cultural identities. The hardest part of this is creating a text that is both realistic and relatable, with a narrator that can be trusted to relay important information accurately throughout the story. Now if a reader were to try to think of a trusty narrator, Oskar might not pop into her mind right away. However, it appears that Fo...

... middle of paper ...

...y healed.
“…Foer refuses to deodorize 9/11 with a simplistic redemptive framework of collective identity; instead, he constructs a complicated, posttraumatic framework by stressing the partial inaccessibility of three characters‟ traumatic experiences—Oskar, his paternal grandfather and grandmother—and the failure of referential language for historical reconstruction in order to problematize redemptive narratives and critically question the political and ethical dimensions of working through the trauma of 9/11” (Mendel).
The use of three narrators enhances the message that the novel is trying to send: trauma affects everyone different and reoccurs through different stages of their lives. It also provides three different perspectives to show the political and cultural effects of the trauma and how those people plan on/actually deal with those effects.

Open Document