Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Heinrich Schliemann excavations analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The second question frequently asked regarding Schliemann’s legacy examines his motives and skill as an excavator: was Heinrich Schliemann a good archaeologist? This question has two sides. First, did Schliemann use the best techniques and technology available to him at time of his first excavation? Second, did he have the same values that other archaeologists have? One area that Schliemann deserves praise in his technique. For the most part, he used the most advanced technology and strategies available to him and pioneered new techniques to catalogue the data he collected. At the first excavation from 1871 to 1873, Schliemann surrounded himself with experts in many fields. He brought in locals to help with Greek and Trojan history, scientists to examine soil and local plants, photographers and artists to take pictures and make sketches. For the time period, Schliemann’s documentation of his major findings was among the best. He drew everything of interest and recorded the times and dates that they were found. However, there were some problems with how he carried out his excavations. Initially, he believed that the Homeric …show more content…
As a result, travel guides, like the famous Baedeker, panoramic paintings, and travelogues all became much more popular during this time, and artists were encouraged to fantasize their writing and painting to make it seem more interesting to potential tourists because their works were being viewed by a wider audience. This change in interests was reflected in Schliemann’s own writing. He described his journey through Greece and the Troad as a travelogue in Ithaka, der Peloponnes, und Troja. Archäologische Forschungen, and his accounts of the discoveries he made at Hisarlik were heavily fantasized. One example of this is in the explanation Schliemann offers for why Priam’s Treasure was found near the wall instead of inside the
Schliemann’s archaeological breakthrough was instigated 6.5 km from the Aegean Sea in Turkey. In 1865, German-American adventurer Schliemann arrived at what was assumed to be Troys location. After reading the Iliad and inspecting the “Tell of Hissarlik” he was convinced he had found Troy. Schliemann believed that the Iliad was so true that it must be based on history, and his discovery of one of the many promising tells in the area motivated him to begin his dig. He discovered that this Tell had nine major levels and large walls, like Homer described. He claimed that the second (Troy II) was Homers ‘Citadel of Priam’. However if Schliemann and Homers Troy were the same, literature did not confirm.
Archaeologists have been popular characters in American Fiction at least since the 1920’s. In the movie The Fifth Element directed by Adrian Lyne an archaeologist makes a startling discovery, which kicks off the entire plot for the movie. The setting is a popular one for that of archaeologists which is Egypt in the year 1914.
...ncyclopedia of Archaeology, Ed. Deborah M. Pearsall. Vol. 3. Oxford, United Kingdom: Academic Press, 2008. p1896-1905. New Britain: Elsevier, Inc.
... one can deny this. His important discoveries in Troy, Mycenae and Tiryns have a significant impact on art history for many reasons as mentioned in the previous paragraphs. In addition, his most significant discoveries are the gold jewels he found in Troy, “Mask of Agamemnon” and shaft graves that he discovered in Mycenae. He wanted to be an archeologist since he was young after knowing Homer’s Iliad poems that his father used to tell him about. In the other hand, Schliemann received many criticizes about his methods in excavation. I think that even though he used wrong methods in excavation, his discoveries was so important; so people can’t forget about his discoveries and keep criticizing his methods. Therefore, I think it is more important now to search and excavate, in order to find additional discoveries that would help us to know more about people in the past.
The Trojan War and its characters are detailed in the writings of Homer, Vergil, Dante and many others. It is a fantastical tale of a decade-long siege of a powerful city by a massive pan-hellenic force. However, even though it has proved to be such a rich source of inspiration for writers, poets and artists throughout history, it is debated whether it actually took place. Heinrich Schliemann famously said “I have gazed on the face of Agamemnon.” on discovering tombs with the bodies of Mycenaean chieftains in Turkey. The German businessman-turned-archaeologist claimed to have discovered the city of Troy at the hill now called Hisarlik – about three miles from the Dardanelles. However, his claims are still disputed today. Before tackling the question of whether the Trojan War actually occurred, we must ask in what form. What exactly do we mean by “the Trojan War”? There is no definitive version of the events in the war, as our knowledge of it comes from a myriad different sources. Then we should consider Schliemann’s discoveries, and the other archaeological evidence for the Trojan War. Finally, after we have defined “Trojan War” in context of archaeology and historical fact, we must then draw conclusions about the extent to which archaeology proves its historical authenticity.
However, the artefacts brought to England from Benin in 1897 were an anomaly. The craftsmanship and sophistication were such that some were reminiscent of the beautiful figures in the Hofkiche, Innsbruck 1502-1563 (plate 3.1.12. Visited...
While digging in the far reaches of the African outback, now know as the western part of Kenya, archaeologist Bozo excavated a site that revolutionized the thoughts of the scientific world. At this site they found many interesting artifacts and paintings that included proof of an early civilization. At this time scientists are calling this civilization “Pontu” after one of the paintings suggested that a pontoon was used for transportation across Lake Victoria, one of the adjacent lakes.
The Iliad alone would never have been a reliable source without archaeological evidence to verify the actuality of a Trojan war. Therefore archaeologists have been working on the site known as hissarlik since the 1800’s to uncover truths about the myth. Frank Calv...
"We could describe (Heinrich) Schliemann's excavations on the hill of Hissarlik and consider their results without speaking of Troy or even alluding to it," Georges Perrot wrote in 1891 in his Journal des Savants. "Even then, they would have added a whole new chapter to the history of civilization, the history of art" (qtd. in Duchêne 87). Heinrich Schliemann's life is the stuff fairy tales are made of. A poor, uneducated, and motherless boy rises through his hard work and parsimonious lifestyle to the heights of wealth (Burg 1,2). He travels the world and learns its languages ("Heinrich Schliemann"), takes a beautiful Greek bride, and together they unearth the treasures of Troy and the citadel of Agamemnon, thereby fulfilling the dream he has chased since childhood (Calder 18,19; Burg 8). Indeed, by presenting his life in romantic autobiographies as a series of adventures, starring Heinrich Schliemann as the epic hero (Duchêne 14), he ensured his status as a lasting folk hero and perennial bestseller (Calder 19).
Heinrich Schliemann was a famous archaeologist in the 19th century. As a child, his father told him the stories of the Iliad and the Odysseus and at the age of eight, Schliemann vowed to himself that he would find the city of Troy. He eventually succeeded and dug up the suspected city of Troy and also Mycenae. He was not very skilled, careful or scrupulous with his work and many other archaeologists complained that he was destroying many things that should be preserved. He claimed he and seen the face of Agamemnon because he dug up a set of tombs. There was one that had a body covered in gold and the face was covered by a golden mask. Schliemann took off the mask and the face stayed intact for three seconds. From that, he believed he had seen the face of Agamemnon.
Moundville has been the focus of a large amount of archaeological interest due to its impressive earthworks. Clarence B. Moore produced well-publicized works. During his time in Moundville in 1905 and 1906, Moore pierced the mounds with “trial holes,” finding numerous burials and related artifacts. Unlike many treasure hunters, Moore donated the majority of his find...
SHA, and other archaeological societies, institutions, scholars and archaeologists find it hard to conduct or even to get involved in such shows that are produced for the entertaining of fans and also for gaining revenue. The Society for American Archaeology (SAA) is working on clearing-house project that will help in building public awareness about archaeology and the way it is practiced, therefore the project is seeking input from professionals and the interested public, in order to share and contribute information and
of ‘Biblical Archaeology’ and saw it as a means of establishing the credibility of the
...ity in Classical Athens. New York, NY: Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation (USA) in Collaboration with the National Archaeological Museum, Athens, 2008. Print.
The Oriental Institute featured an exhibit focused on the development of ancient Middle East Pioneers to the Past: American Archaeologists in the Middle East 1919–20 January 12 - August 29, 2010. And this was the exhibit I found most intriguing and most i...