Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different learning styles compare and contrast
Myers Briggs Type Indicator helps identify the different personality types+essay
Myers Briggs Type Indicator helps identify the different personality types+essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Different learning styles compare and contrast
The Myers-Biggs Personality Type Indicator is known as one of the world’s most popular personality type assessments. The Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator is a self-inventory designed to identify a person 's personality type, strengths, and preferences (psycology.about.com). This inventory of personality types is used as tool by those who seek to distinguish and understand their unique personalities, including their strengths, weakness, etc.
The results of my Myers-Briggs Type indicator test described me as an ISFJ. An ISFJ stands for Introvert, Sensing, Feeling, and Judging. As someone who is an introvert, I am most comfortable in low-key environments, unlike extraverts who enjoy highly stimulated crowds and interactions. ISFJ’s are
…show more content…
After taking this assessment, I scored highest under Naturalistic, Intrapersonal, and Interpersonal, with all three being well over 60 percent. As much as I enjoy being one with Nature and our natural environment, I do not see myself as a Naturalistic learner. After reading the descriptions for Intrapersonal and Interpersonal, I would agree with both of these learning styles. Interpersonal is described as being about social interaction and understanding peoples’ motives, emotions, perspectives, and moods (edutopia.org). Intrapersonal intelligence is said to be the road to achievement, learning, and personal satisfaction (edutopia.org). Intrapersonal intelligence is about being in-tuned with your personal needs, desires, and emotions. Someone with intrapersonal intelligence usually sets goals, has great self-management skills and is aware of their strengths and …show more content…
I am someone who is introverted which explains why I scored so high under the intrapersonal learning style. Being an intrapersonal learner is described as someone who studies alone, sets goals, self-manages, and self-reflects. I also scored very high under Interpersonal learning style which is a learning style that involves social interaction and understanding people and their motives, emotions, perspectives, and moods. Although this would not fit in with my introverted self, I am a very observant person; I seek to understand people and their views and feelings which fits with the Feelings aspect in my ISFJ personality. Some of my identifiable strengths as a learner would be my time management, and planning. I am very organized and I plan in advance what needs to be completed day to day. Also, my keen interest in others’ perspectives is a strength that allows me to keep an open mind and respect different point of views. A weakness of mine as a learner is how easily distracted I can become. If I am not entirely invested in an assignment my mind wanders and I slowly begin to lose interest, this is why it is imperative that I place myself in an environment that has limited
Personality types stems from Carl Jung spend time observing personality preferences, which he later on published in his in 1921. Carl’s discovery of the two major typical differences in human psychology such as extrovert and introvert influenced Katherine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Myers theories and lead them to experiment during World War II. Myers and Briggs worked on methods that would help women, who heretofore had no prior workplace experience, find those types of jobs that were most comfortable and effective (Myers & Myers, 1996). The three learning styles I have chosen to write about would meet the needs of the learners and provide an effective learner/teacher experience. Therefore, the need for learning level in people varies at all levels, to make sure the delivery method meets the learners’ expectation, it is important to re-evaluate the styles of learning chosen and make sure all background
The Myers and Briggs Analysis is a series of questions that when answered are examined and grouped together in order to determine the personalities of those taking this test. This particular test can result in sixteen different outcomes or types of personalities, which is determined by four different categories that judge if you are introverted or extroverted, use your senses or your intuition, your choice to think or use your feelings, and finally if you are judgmental or perceptive. These series of questions are designed to judge our personalities and help us to determine which career pathways we will be most suited for based on our personality traits and abilities to work well with others, which is important for our future decisions.
Have you ever wondered why you react to situations in the manner to you do? Whether you are calm and collect, or rigid and boisterous, the way you react to life is linked to your personality. Many different models exist to determine your personality type using answers from a series of questions or selecting between two opposing options. The most popularly used assessment is the Myers-Briggs Indicator Type test, which is based off the foundation of C. G. Jung’s work on personality types. The typology in the Myers-Briggs Indicator Type test yields results that determine if the person is introverted (I) or extraverted (E), sensing (S) or intuitive (N), thinking (T) or feeling (F), and judging (J) or perceiving (P). Each of these types corresponds
Overall, the INTJ type is an accurate description of my personality. I concur with the assessments that INTJ’s do not “take criticism personally” and they are not “afraid of hard work, and will put forth a great deal of effort towards something that they are interested in” (INTJ Personal Growth, 2014). I am confident in my own abilities and take no offense at work if others are able to show me a better/easier way of performing a task (as long I am approached professionally). Additionally, I am usually whole-heartedly committed toward efforts when I see the importance or benefit from such actions. For example, if I need to put in a few 15-16 hours days to ensure the job is done on-time and correctly I will do so without much thought. My temperament of “NT” also known as the “Rationals” is consistent with what I see in myself (The Four Temperaments, 2014). As stated in the Thinking section however, I do have a tendency to show empathy towards others when faced with an emotional
The Kiersey Temperament Test shows that I am of an ISJF personality which is characterized by an introvert with a reflective communication style. As an introvert, I have many disciplines capabilities that include perfectionism and procrastination. As a reflective communication stylist, I admire orderliness and naturally appear formal and stiff. No one way of communication is the best so I hope to modify some of my ISJF traits to enable me be more versatile when dealing with any situation especially during
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) has recognized my profile as Introvert, Intuitive, Thinking and Judgment (INTJ). As an introvert, I can get nervous among other people. It does not pose a problem for an individual. On the other hand, in order to be an effective leader, it is important for me to keep a profound communicational relationship with my subordinates. Without proper communication skills, it is not possible to establish a functional relationship with my subordinates. This may jeopardize the success of any activity that we are involved in. The introvert part is perhaps the major barrier which may keep me away from being an effective leader.
The Keirsey Temperament Sorter II identified my temperament as artisan, and the classic temperament report identified me as an ISTP, or Introverted Sensing Thinking Perceiving. The description of my temperament was dead on with my view of myself, especially the more in depth classic temperament. My strengths include an excellent ability to apply logic and reason to solve problems or discover how things work, and being high;y practical and realistic, however I will not function well in regimented or structured environments, as I will become bored or feel stifled. This temperament profile also correlates to my learning style, as the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II results also mention that I learn best hands-on, and states that ISTP’s are a master of their physical environment.
This paper researches the typical traits of the INTJ personality type according to the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. Additionally, I will be discussing the opposite personality of INTJ, type ESFP. I will detail two past experiences where my INTJ personality posed problems. This paper will also explore strategies that may benefit the INTJ personality type, myself included.
After taking the online personality test I learned that I am an INTJ personality. Consequently, this was not a big surprise for me because I had already taken a similar test in my psychology class and ended up with the same result. I did not learn how accurate the test was the first time since I did not do further analysis on the exact meaning of my personality type. The 16 personality type’s website de...
The list of IB traits involve terms that a successful student should learn to adapt throughout their school years. Traits such as caring, risk-taker, open-minded, and balanced relate more to one’s personal life than traits like knowledgeable, thinker, reflective, principled, inquirer, and communicator which are more focused on the academic portion of one’s life. Although not everyone will begin the program with all these traits in their pocket, all students should grow and adapt towards new possibilities and a new personality than originally.
Before taking the multiple intelligences quiz, I felt that I identified with a lot of the ones presented. When my peers presented the intenlligences they identified with, I felt like I was able to a little to all of them. When I looked more into each individual intelligence I realized there was only one I truly identified with. The multiple intellgences survery comfirmed this. I scored highest in the visual/spatial section. I scored a 9 out of 10 in visual/spatial, compared to the other categories in which I scored 0-2. I did not score any higher in any of the other categories because I do not identify with them at all.
My results said that I have an ISFJ personality. My scores were introvert (56%), Sensing (31%), Feeling (16%), and Judging (44%). The assessment stated that ISFJs frequently find themselves in occupations that either involves a lot of dealings with other people and require thoroughness and persistence. They work in organizations of various sizes and industries, where as a rule they work with people. Very often ISFJs recognize their potential in healthcare (nurse, patient care, and medical services, as well as administrative jobs) and several community care organizations. I do agree with some of the Jung Typology Seal assessments. I agree with being an introvert since I am a person that is reserved and to myself half of the time, but, on the other hand, I do like to serve others. I do not agree that I am overworked. If I get to the point to where I feel overworked, I will go to my boss and discuss the matter, so that I can get help with my work before resulting in some of extent psychosomatic illnesses. I agree with the part about working best with a small group or one-on-one situation. I also agree with the traditional careers for ISFJs attitude that include: teaching, social work, most religious work, nursing, clerical and secretarial work of any kind, and some
I(introvert), N(iNutitive), T(thinking), and J(judging) is one of the rarest of the sixteen psychological types and accounts for 1-2% of the population and just 0.8% of women. It is often a challenge to find like-minded individuals who are able to keep up with our relentless intellectualism and their chess-like maneuvering. Those of us with the INTJ personality type are imaginative, ambitious yet reserved, and amazingly curious. Good
The Big Five personality factors are the modern way of describing someone’s feelings, actions, and traits. This new factor map, improving Hans and Sybil Eysenck’s two-dimensional map which consisted of a stable/unstable axis and an introverted/extroverted axis, has five different factors. They are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism and everyone can be described using these five criteria. This paper will discuss and interpret my results from a Big Five personality test including how accurate I believe it is and how this might change in the future.
more aware of my personality type, “(ISTJ) I am an Introvert (34%) Sensing (12%) Thinking