Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Happiness in fahrenheit 451
Happiness in fahrenheit 451
Fahrenheit 451 essay happiness introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Red Convertible Can materialism bring happiness? Although materialistic stuff doesn't lead to true happiness, in "The Red Convertible" Louise shows how one automobile brings two brothers together. The main character, Lyman Lamartine is a very sensible, smart, caring and a loving boy; who uses the red convertible to bring his brother, Henry Junior back to reality. The two brothers buy a convertible together and drive around the country before Henry is drafted into the army. However, when Henry returns from war, nothing is the same anymore. One can easily see the love both, Lyman and Henry had for one another, especially Lyman. He never calls the red convertible is own in fact, throughout the story he treats the convertible as Henry's car. After the enemy caught Henry, Lyman wrote him several letters. "Even though I didn't know if those letters would get through. I kept him informed all about the car" said Lyman ( Erdrich 332). While Henry was away for 3 years, "In those years, I'd …show more content…
Lyman genuinely cared for Henry and wanted to take him to a hospital but was afraid that the hospital would keep him. Lyman then thought the car would be a good distraction for Henry. "So I bided my time and waited for my chance to interest him in the vehicle" said Lyman. And "One night Henry was off somewhere. I took myself a hammer. I went out to that car and I did a number on its underside. Whacked it up" ( Erdrich 334). Lyman is very smart and intentionally damages the convertible because he knows Henry would try to fix it and will have something to keep him busy. Furthermore, Lyman started noticing something divergent about Henry. "He was better than he had been before....He ate more slowly and didn't jump up and down during the meal to get this or that or look out the window....He was always out with that car or going to get parts for it" ( Erdrich
In the article, "But Will It Make You Happy," Stepahnie Rosenblum shows us how to be happy with less money spent and more purchasing an experience. people spent their money to find happiness, but they do not realize that the experiences had more value of material objects. I agree with the author that experiences give people more satisfaction than spending money on materials as well small things bring more happiness.
The National Institute of Mental Health recognizes PTSD as a “disorder that develops in some people who have seen or lived through a shocking, scary, or dangerous event.” Since Henry’s return from the war, Lyman describes his brother as tense. There are many examples of Henry’s strange behaviors. However one truly stood out to Lyman and his family. He says, “I looked over, and he’d bitten through his lip. Blood was going down his chin” (970). Lyman continues that, “he took a bite of his bread his blood fell onto it until he was eating his own blood mixed in with the food” (970). Henry clearly is troubled by something, and the troubles all began after Henry went off to the Vietnam War. I’m no doctor, but one could simply recognize Henry is suffering from some form of
“I rather would be blind than then see this world in yellow, and bought and sold by kings that hammer roses into gold.” (King Midas Pg.462 Para.10) Many think that if they got what they wanted they would be happy, but if the world was all based on malterlistic things and everyone got what they wanted there would be chaos and no feelings just want and people would do crazy things to get what they want. Now a day’s people mistake malterlistic things for happiness. “The necklace”, “Ads may spur unhappy kids to embrace materialism”, And “Thrill of the chase” illustrates examples of materialism and show some base their happiness on it.
Whereas, when Henry was drafted, not to face his feelings and fears he offered his half of the car to Lyman. Clearly, this was his way of using the car to communicate, as Henry said to Lyman, “Now it’s yours” (326). Also, this could also be considered as a means to try to ease Lyman’s pain. Nevertheless, Lyman fought for the relationship without speaking the words. Besides, what’s more Lyman could not deal with the fact that Henry may not return, and he also used the car to communicate by rejecting his offer saying, “Thanks for the extra key,”(326). By the same token, they were using the car, by giving it up, as a symbol of their love; however, neither wanted the car without the other brother. In any case, without the car to connect them, they are in a break-up
Throughout "The Red Convertible" Erdrich embraces the car as a symbol for the powerful relationship between two brothers, Henry and Lyman. The brothers combine their money to acquire a red convertible which they drove everywhere together; the car symbolized that relationship. Lyman preserved the vehicle while Henry was in the Army, deployed to Vietnam. Even when Henry gave Lyman the car, Lyman always regarded the car as Henry’s, which Erdrich depicts with the following passage, “I always thought of it as his car while he was gone, even though when he left he said, ‘Now it’s yours,’ and threw me the key.” (Erdrich 357) The brothers held their relationship with high regard, Henry trusted Lyman with the car enough to give Lyman his share of the vehicle while he was away. Conversely, Lyman surmised that that the car would always belong to Henry; just like their relationship, the car was important and would always belong to both of them. During Henry’s deployment, Lyman preserved the state of the car, he kept it in immaculate condition while waiting for Henry's return. By spending so much time caring for the car, Lyman in a way was caring for his brother. Little did Lyman know that his brother was going to come back a changed...
To what lengths would you go for a loved one? Would you destroy something in hopes that it would save them? That 's what Lyman Lamartine did in hopes to fix his PTSD afflicted brother. "The Red Convertible" was written by Louise Erdrich in 1974 and published in 2009 along with several other short stories. Lyman, and Henry, are brothers. The story starts by telling us about how the two brothers acquired a red convertible. Henry ends up being drafted into the Vietnam War, and comes back home suffering from PTSD. One day the pair decided to take a drive to the Red River because Henry wanted to see the high water. Ultimately, the story ends with a cliff-hanger, and we are left wondering what happens to the boys. The symbolic nature of the red convertible will play a key role in this literary analysis, along with underling themes of PTSD and war.
PTSD, also known as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, can cause change and bring about pain and stress in many different forms to the families of the victims of PTSD. These changes can be immense and sometimes unbearable. PTSD relates to the characters relationship as a whole after Henry returns from the army and it caused Henry and Lyman’s relationship to crumble. The Red Convertible that was bought in the story is a symbol of their brotherhood. The color red has many different meanings within the story that relates to their relationship.
she replied after a moment. “Daisy, I saw some trouble on the road. George Wilson’s wife was killed. You know the fella that owns that garage? A car killed her, she said.
In The Red Convertible two characters are displayed and explained throughout the tale. Henry and Lyman are brothers living on a reservation. Henry is the older brother, and Lyman is the younger brother and the narrator as well. Henry is a young man earning money very quickly with his many jobs that he has earned while Henry was recently laid off from his job at a jewelry store. Throughout the story the author develops both characters through a variety of techniques. Character development was key to making this story the wonderful story it is.
war, Lyman kept the car in perfect working order. Lyman wrecks the underside of the car
His name is Seymour Glass and he served in some capacity in World War II. What we do know is that his wife Muriel Glass’s mother is very concerned over her daughters wellbeing around Seymour. She shows her concern when she states “How did he behave- in the car and all?” and when she reacts to the news of Seymour driving “He drove? Muriel, you gave me your word” (Salinger 6). Throughout the story it is implied that Seymour had incidents such as crashing a car and having an outburst directed toward Muriel’s grandmother. The severity of these incidents is never fully exposed, but 400 dollars to fix a car in 1948 is a lot of
Even though Lyman and Henry’s relationship ends up ending, the red convertible will always be with Henry and will always be a memory for Lyman. While Lyman struggles with losing his brother to the war, the red convertible brought them back together, even though it was really the end. Henry was faced with war and when he was finished and came back home he changed because of his experiences. Both Lyman and Henry changed throughout the events that took place, but unfortunately for Lyman the red convertible was not able to bring back the relationship they had when they first bought it together.
Contrary to belief, genuine happiness is very rarely found at the bottom of a shopping basket or on the leather seats of a brand new car. Often we hear the cliché saying “Money can’t buy happiness” but this is in fact true. Whilst the elation and delight brought from finally owning a wanted item is extraordinary, you must remind yourself that your happiness should not become dependant upon your ownership of this item. Being happy is not something you can purchase from a shop or car dealership, it is the way you take on life. Unfortunately, happiness does not have its own aisle at shops and never will.
This is a thought-provoking book about the pursuit of material goods. Kasser is not a preacher, but a scientist. He presents his evidence carefully, and concludes that materialism is a game not worth playing even on its own terms of promoting human happiness.
Material goods don’t make us happy. Acquiring things like houses and cars only have a transient effect on happiness. People’s desires for material possessions crank up at the same, or greater rate, than their salaries. Again, this means that despite considerably more luxurious possessions, people end up no happier. There’s even evidence that materialism make us less happy.