Examples Of Conformism In Huck Finn

1285 Words3 Pages

America constantly evolves which consequently leads citizens to be either “two kinds” of people who compose it, an individual or a conformist. Fortunately, they do not have to permanently label themselves considering there are certain extents to which they can be one or the other. As a U.S. citizen, one should stand out to grow intellectually and find self happiness and although many people like to think of themselves as a unique person than the rest of society, conforming is necessary when lives are at risk and not for the satisfaction of others. The choice to be an individual comes solely on the desire to change one’s own morals, beliefs, and to find self satisfaction. What makes an individual unique is their beliefs and aspirations. Throughout …show more content…

Huck wanted “to stand well with [Tom Sawyer’s gang] and have their inspiring approval and praise”(Twain). Huck is still a child, therefore his need for self approval from peers is necessary, but he encounters Jim, and the acceptance of being around him is defiance in itself. His character develops that he values his personal goal to “make Jim just as a free man as [he is]”(233) and to “do justice, cost what it may” in order to “refuse allegiance to, and to resist [what society deems as right]” ( Thoreau). Even when the readers and Huck himself know that he holds the correct answer, he holds back in fear of what the society will think if he helps a slave escape. Huck moves from valuing Jim as property to valuing him as any ordinary man who “cared just as much for his people as white folks do for their’n, [...] a mighty good nigger, [he is]” (155). Huck grows intellectually by refusing racial stereotypes through adventures and the importance of him gathering his own morals makes Huck rediscover himself, an independent thinker not phased by the opinions of society. Similar to Orwell in “Shooting an Elephant”, Huck’s beliefs rebel against what “the sneering yellow faces of young men” thought in the same …show more content…

In most cases, compliance with society is done to avoid punishment or ridicule. Orwell admits that “the crowd [yells] with hideous laughter” and he feels “[the village’s] two thousand wills pressing [him] forward” to obliterate the elephant. He is “only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind” therefore, not doing as the crowd says will result in brutal suffering and mockery. Despite Orwell not fulfilling his intuition of renouncing the elephant, doing so would not benefit Orwell in the slightest. He knows the mob will disfavor his decision and face the mob where they “fight with courage that’s born in them, but with the courage that’s borrowed from their mass”(Twain,147). Similarly, Huck does not tell Pap the truth about why he is holding a gun when Pap wakes up. He compulsively lies that “somebody tried to get in, so [he] laying for [the intruder]” in order to abstain Pap from aggressively accusing such lies and possibly beating Huck (30). The significance of Huck’s lies are to protect himself and not make matters worse with Pap. Punishment is a rational reason why someone would subject their will to others. An uncommon reason why some would also conform is to live in a harmonizing society. “Little Boxes” depicts a utopia despite the absence of individualism. The neighborhood displays how synchronizing their

Open Document