Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Euthanasia - "unethical, immoral
Ethical dilemma of euthanasia
Euthanasia - "unethical, immoral
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Euthanasia - "unethical, immoral
Today, there is a large debate over the situation and consequences of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the act of ending a human’s life by lethal injection or the stoppage of medication, or medical treatment. It has been denied by most of today’s population and is illegal in the fifty states of the United States. Usually, those who undergo this treatment have a disease or an “unbearable” pain somewhere in the body or the mind. Since there are ways, other than ending life, to stop pain caused by illness or depression, euthanasia is immoral, a disgrace to humanity, according to the Hippocratic Oath, and should be illegal throughout the United States.
Instead of turning to death as an option, patients should realize that there are other ways to stop pain caused by illness or depression. For example, palliative care is available in today’s society. Palliative care is a medical specialty based solely on pain and is very advanced in today’s technology. If the patients that requested euthanasia were to undergo this treatment, they would not feel pain, or as much as they normally would, and the pain would be more tolerable (O’Steen). Also, in most situations, the longing for death or suicidal death, which was revealed to be clinical depression, can be treated by medicine and sympathetic counseling (Bonin).
In the eyes of Christians, euthanasia is immoral, especially to the Schindler family. Their daughter Terry Schiavo was a victim of euthanasia. She had been diagnosed with hypoxic encephalopathy when she was twenty-six years of age. She became a human vegetable, a person who lacks the ability to move or think correctly, and as a result, tubes were used to feed and keep her alive. Her husband filed a case to withdraw the tubes. Terry’s famil...
... middle of paper ...
.... As the Church says, euthanasia goes against the dignity of a living person and is a crime against humanity (“Euthanasia Statement”).
In conclusion, euthanasia is proven to be immortal and should stay illegal throughout the United States. It is the act of killing someone, which is murder, and can result in doctors being sent to jail or severe court cases against others. It can break families apart, one side may want the patient to be euthanized and the other may want the person to stay alive. It would result in fights and leave a scar on the family bond. The patient may have never wanted death, but their guardians decided for them. Their life that they may have wanted to keep was ended merely from another person’s hand. It is their life, not someone else’s; no one should have the power to end their life, not even themselves. That is God’s decision, not a human’s.
Euthanasia is and will always be one of the leading ethical issues present in the world. There are strong arguments present on both sides of the issue including that of one of the most influential institutions on the planet; the Catholic Church. The Church has, and always will be against the killing of a human being. This applies to euthanasia: “An action or omission which of itself and by intention causes death, with the purpose of eliminating all suffering.” (Pope John Paul II - Evangelium Vitae). The Church also refers to euthanasia as “assisted suicide” and the “mercy killing”. “Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church – 2277).
“Michael Manning, MD, in his 1998 book Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?, traced the history of the word euthanasia: ‘The term euthanasia.originally meant only 'good death,'but in modern society it has come to mean a death free of any anxiety and pain, often brought about through the use of medication.” It seems there has always been some confusion and questions from our society about the legal and moral questions regarding the new science of euthanasia. “Most recently, it has come to mean'mercy killing' — deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individual’s suffering.’” I would like to emphasize the words “to spare the individual’s suffering”.
Euthanasia is a subject that has been discussed, accepted, and rejected for several centuries. It is a subject that is difficult to digest much less discuss in the public forum, or even with one’s own family or physician. Society should not rush into a hasty decision, but as a society a joint decision needs to be made about the legalization of euthanasia. A compromise, legalizing euthanasia would allow terminally ill patients to have an active role in and/or a choice of how and when to end their life. When it comes to the possibility of living a life that is expected to involve extreme pain and suffering until death, one would think the answer
In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons
Euthanasia is very much against the divine law. Both the Christian and Islam religions condemn it. Verses in the Bible, the holy book of Christians, and Quran, the holy book of Muslims, would prove how religiously unlawful euthanasia is. Daniel 13:53 of the Bible states that “The innocent and the just, thou shall not kill,” while Exodus 23:7 tells that “The innocent and just, you shall not put to death.” While the Quran says in chap. 6 verse 151: “Take not the life Allah made secret, otherwise in the course of justice.” In other words, we do not have a claim on death, but rather death has a claim on us. We are not the absolute masters of our life, only God is. He is the supreme master of life and we have no right to usurp His dominion.
The word euthanasia is derived from the Greek words “eu thanatos,” meaning good or easy death. It refers to the act of purposely ending the life of a person with an incurable, terminal, or painful illness or in an irreversible coma. Also known as mercy killing, the process has two different procedures- passive and active- and can be correlated with physician assisted death. Naturally, this practice is highly controversial and illegal in most countries as it deals with a person dying prematurely. But in the case of a patient in a terminal situation, euthanasia should be made legal so as to allow the person a painless death, instead of one marked with suffering.
Euthanasia refers to the exercise of deliberately ending the life of a patient suffering from a chronic and excruciating disease or in an unalterable coma. Euthanasia, infanticide and suicide were practiced in the 5th century up to the 1st century before Christ. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words, “Eu” as in good and “Thanatosis” as in death. Euthanasia is sometimes addressed as “assisted suicide”. Some countries have adapted euthanasia as a legal death sentence to one’s self such as Belgium, and Luxembour; whereas in other countries it is strictly forbidden. Euthanasia should not be permitted because doctors are never sure that the patient’s death is imminent, humans do not have the right to decide who lives and who doesn’t, and a patient can never be certain of such a decision.
Euthanasia is one of the most recent and controversial debates today (Brogden, 2001). As per the Canadian Medical Association, euthanasia refers to the process of purposely and intentionally performing an act that is overtly anticipated to end the person’s life (CMA, 1998)
Physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia is the voluntary termination of one 's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Patients suffer daily from implications regarding both mental and physical health. The stigma surrounding euthanasia is that the patients cannot make a well thought out decision because many believe the patients’ thoughts are clouded or that the patients are trying to take advantage of the economic system backing both physician assisted suicide or end-of-life care. Although these claims may contain some truth in regard to certain people, terminally ill patients who deal with some form of physical or psychological pain should have the right to physician-assisted
Euthanasia, also commonly referred to as mercy killing or assisted suicide, is the painless killing of a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition, by a physician. The reason for euthanasia being such an arguable topic is due to society's differing opinions. Some believe that it is humane to put someone out of their misery, while others argue that it is not okay to kill someone under any circumstance. Let's analyse two controverting articles on the matter.
Euthanasia has been a debated topic dating back since ancient times. Euthanasia is the practice of painlessly killing a patient suffering from a terminal or severely painful disease and is also known as assisted suicide. The only difference between assisted suicide and other forms of euthanasia is which person performs the final procedure that kills the patient. Both sides strongly argue if the practice should be allowed or not and both sides do have strong arguments that support them. Currently in the United States, euthanasia is fully legal in the states of California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington and is legal under court ruling in Montana. Overall with the rapid growth of medical technology, euthanasia shouldn’t be the last resort,
Euthanasia is a Greek word which means gentle and easy death. However, it is the other way around. It is not a gentle or easy death because there is not a type of death which called gentle in the world. According to writer Prof. Ian Dowbiggin, in Ancient Greece people used euthanasia without the patient's permission. It means that in Ancient Greece they did not care about the voluntariness. Also, there are just few doctors who obey the rules of the Hippocratic Oath. (250) After Christianity, the church found out how evil suicide was and they told people killing another person or themselves was a brutal behavior. For a short time, nobody questioned euthanasia deeply. However, during reforms, euthanasia became known again. According to research that made in NY about euthanasia and assisted suicide, Renaissance and Reformation authors challenged church against Euthanasia and they succeeded. (80) In other words, the church made euthanasia illegal. The reason for this accomplishment was euthanasia did more harm than good and it was open to abuse also it was misused by doctors. Doctors use euthanasia to earn more money and for other benefits. They can kill people by saying there is no preference They can make money by killing people who want to die, but not suffering a disease. Unfortunately, there are some countries which legalized euthanasia. However, euthanasia should not be legalized because, it weakens medical research, it up against with the medical ethics and doctors' duties, it puts pressure on people, and most religions are against euthanasia.
Euthanasia, according to the dictionary, means the killing of a person who is suffering from an incurable disease. Lately, it had been a huge debate over whether euthanasia should be legalized or not. Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized if it is voluntary. I have three reasons for my argument.
The world today is full of suffering. Diseases that are often incurable, make one’s life unbearable, steal sense of life and give a strong encouragement to die. Even the fast progress of medicine does not give opportunity to save one’s life or reduce their pain. Euthanasia comes from Greek words, Eu (good) and Thanatosis (death) and it means “Good Death.” (A General History of Euthanasia). As well, Euthanasia is the proper term for mercy killing – Practice purposely ending a life in order to ease pain and misery. At present Euthanasia is not acceptable to be practiced on people in most States. However, individuals should have the right to end his or her life by Euthanasia because of the individual freedom, suffering caused by disease
Euthanasia is a controversial issue. Many people believe that doctors should not prescribe any medication that ends a person’s life since it is considered to be against the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath states that doctors are professionally obliged to save lives. Some consider euthanasia to be immoral and others say that it is murder. Euthanasia should be legalized because it provides a way to relieve pain, brings relief to a person when their quality of life is low, relieves economic burden, and is simply a personal choice.