Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Utilitarianism and Critics
Mass shooting introduction essay
Mass shooting introduction essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 2018 alone, there have been 148 mass shootings according to the mass shooting tracker organization. Since columbine? I can only imagine. For my analysis I will discuss three possible ethical perspectives from the point of view whether or not news outlets should broadcast information about the perpetrator in regards to mass shootings. The three ethical point of views I will use to explain my ultimate opinion are utilitarianism, pluralistic theory of values, and care based ethics. Utilitarianism is a concept that focuses on the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. It revolves around usefulness and benefit while focusing on a larger population. It is highly outcome based so to do a thorough analysis one has to weigh the outcomes …show more content…
This is pretty much golden rule or empathy based and to do what is best for others in a given situation. This being said, is it the responsibility of the media to promote the golden rule or to record life as it happens? On one hand, the media could dismiss all knowledge of said perpetrator and promote the well being of others in terms of an empathetic point of view. On the other hand, is it not important to establish a sense of factual evidence and details from an event that occurred? Citizens should be informed, however, from a care based ethics point of view which promotes the strict foundation of doing good unto others, the best answer would be to not publish facts and pictures to keep the feelings of a said society at bay. The problem with care based ethics is the fact that one can not predict what someone else wants. This seems to be a highlight in terms of every concept discussed so far. However this does ring true. Just because one person would find it upsetting or harmful to see the face of the person who killed a family member, what is to be said about those who not deem it as upsetting? Who is being accounted for as to what is offensive or what is not okay for others to
As us Americans we are actually making the stereotype of we always carry guns around sound true to the rest of the world considering that, we are the “31% percent of all public mass shootings which at least four people are killed.” (TheWeek.com) But under a broader definition USA counted 346 mass shootings including shooting deaths of four or more victims in a 17- year period. The worst part about this information is this year we already have recorded 249 mass shootings in about 7 months close to the same amount USA counted over 17 years! This is a problem that must be solve for the safety in this country but also prevent more mass shooting from happening. “According to a Mother Jones study: Only 23 percent have been treated for mental illness.” ( Gallagher )
“Utilitarianism is the creed which accepts as the foundations of morals utility of the greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” (Mil, 90). Utilitarianism ethics is based on the greatest good for the greatest number meaning that the moral agent does what he/she thinks will be
In my perspective, this article changed my world view on how providing health care won’t necessarily stop shootings from happening. An example given in the article was of how many of the past shooters were unable to recognize their problems. This would led to them not looking for the help they needed. “ Because they blame the outside world for their problems, mass murders would likely resist therapies…” These mass murders always blame their problems on others which is why they commit these crimes.
Chaos, panic, confusion; Police sirens approaching at a distance, are only a few of the many descriptive words that can describe the scene of an active shooter incident. Perhaps we are no longer in the 1990s, when in such years the horrific incident of Columbine took place and left a sensation of fear and terror within the American society. Though it has been almost twenty years since the loss of many innocent victims inside of a high school, in today’s modern society we are still seeing active shooter events take place across the United States. On the 14th day in the month of September of the year 2015, an active shooter incident took place inside the premises of Delta State University in the state of Mississippi. The active shooter incident
Utilitarians are people who believe that good is everyone’s pleasure. This is simply what they call general happiness. They believe that happiness is primarily pleasure and the absence of pain. Utilitarians think actions that give most pleasure to a larger quantity of people is morally right. Their two basic view consist of believing that we should nurture everyone’s happiness and not just one’s own, and accepting that some pleasures are bigger than others. Act and Rule Utilitarianism is based on two principles called the Consequentialist Principle and the Utility Principle. The Consequentialist Principle pretty much determines what actions are right from wrong. When determining this, actions are judged based off of the consequences. They believe the right actions will have the best outcomes. This principle does not take
With the media shining so much light upon this topic, it is evident that mass murders in the United States of America are more frequent and deadly. In fact, studies have found that the USA has more mass public shootings than any other country (Christensen). These numbers have only been increasing in the past decades. This is shocking because the USA holds only 5 percent of the world’s population, but as a nation, contributes to 31 percent of mass murders (Christensen). Although these murders continue to be a rare phenomenon, weak gun laws, the need for fame, and issues with societal views are the main causes of the increase in cases.
Names such as Columbine and Pulse have become imperative when discussing mass shootings in the United States. Researchers and politicians have speculated at length regarding the reason for such events, one reoccurring explanation is the accessibility of firearms in the coun-try. Since the 1980’s, the United States
When looking at the crisis that comes with school shootings most people turn to the media, the media often times has incorrect or one sided views of these school shooters by exclusively excluding them due to mental illness .School shooters shouldn’t be excused exclusively in terms of their mental health because school shooters are also perpetrators of bullying. In the case of many school shootings over the past years, most of the talk and commenting from the media always portrays them as the victim and even in some cases even try to make the assumption that other students should’ve been wary of this specific student mainly based off the fact that they seem them as someone who has
The exact number of mass shootings in the United States this year is debatable, however enough have taken place that something needs to be done to stop them from happening again and again as they have this year. There is such a wide variety of opinions regarding how many mass shootings have happened this year due to the definitions that each data gatherer uses to categorize what exactly a mass shooting is. Some websites and groups think of a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people were wounded or killed, meanwhile others only count mass shootings as incidents in which people died and weren’t merely wounded. However, in the end what matters isn’t the definition,
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best
School shootings is a major problem growing in America that needs to be controlled then eventually stopped. The society need to find a better solution on what can be done to help prevent the shootings from happening. Emily DeRuy(2015) stated that a “2014 FBI study found that between 2000-06 and 2007-13, active public shootings have increased about 150 percent in the U.S.” This shows that society has tried many ways to stop school shootings but still has not been successful completely. “In the wake of such tragedies, the reaction has become a routine: a flurry of ‘Thoughts and prayers,’ calls for increased gun control on the Left, rebuttals on the Right, and then silence, until the next shootings ignites the same cycle” (DeRuy,2015,p.2).
Utilitarianism can be defined as: the right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians seem to believe that humans only have two desires, or motivations: happiness and pain. They want as much happiness as possible and the least amount of pain as any other action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning that whether it is right, depends solely on its consequences.
The utilitarian principle is about weighing up social costs and benefits in order to make moral and social decisions in society. The benefits produced by an action are calculated and the quantities of harm the action will produce are deducted from this. There are two mistakes people make when they first start thinking about utilitarianism. Firstly, choosing the right action is not the one that produces the most utility for the person performing the action, but for all persons affected by the action. Secondly, it is not just the immediate and direct consequences of an action being considered, but all foreseeable future costs and benefits, as well as any important indirect effects.
Utilitarianism can be defined as the action is morally true if its results bring happiness and wrong if the consequences is unhappiness. It is a principle that considers that actions are right if they are helpful and in advantage of a society.
Utilitarianism is defined to be “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (Vaughn 64). In other words, for a utilitarian,