Ethical Dilemmas Of El Salvador

1330 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Pros and cons of nonviolent resistance

In El Salvador, in the late 1970’s, there was major political unrest. El Salvador had a military government, that oppressed the lower class, and tried to keep them poor. The military controlled everyone and everything in the country, and if someone opposed them, they would torture and murder the offender. The poor were fighting for their rights, but due to the militaries immense power, they labeled the poor as communists, causing others to think the country was in danger of communist influences. This caused a group known as Guerillas to rise up and fight the military. The Vatican appointed Oscar Romero, a bishop in El Salvador, to the position of Archbishop, as they believed his calm nature would prevent him from getting involved in the crisis. …show more content…

This is when a drastic situation arises, and ones’ response is focusing their attention on the situation at hand. This experience normally occurs when an individual is in a certain state of mind, and a change in the external environment causes them to shift into another state of mind. This could be caused by something such as a scream. The change causes one to think about what is going on, such as, who the person screaming is, what caused them to scream, how can they be helped, and many other emotions. This pushes one to act, not think. This experience is general, and not necessarily directed at a certain individual. This is a uniquely human experience (Grecco, 7-8). In the movie, there is a scene where Romero goes to rescue a guard that is being held hostages by the Guerillas, on the conditions the Guerillas walk free when he comes out. The military goes back on the deal after Romero comes out with the rescued guard and got the Guerillas to lay down their weapons, and is arrested along with the Guerillas. While in his cell, Romero hears a priest and member of the Guerillas, Father Osuna, being tortured. Father Osuna screams out, which alerts Romero who was previously just sitting in his cell. The scream causes him to run to the bars of his cell and try to stop the militants from torturing his friend. One of the things Romero says is “We are human beings” meaning that humans should not be treating other …show more content…

This experience comes from feeling required to obey a rule or law. Something inside an individual drives them to do what is the right thing. An authority can try and convince an individual to follow their reason. The individual can no longer be neutral towards this authority. Either one disagrees, as their desires go against the right thing to do, or one agrees, as the authority desires the right choice as well (9). In the movie, Romero returns to a church, that has been seized by the government, to retrieve the Eucharist. One of the soldiers responds by shooting the Eucharist, and making Romero leave. This person could be considered to have authority over Romero. Romero first obeys, leaving the town, but shortly comes back and walks towards the church, gathering a crowd as he does. He enters the church, and holds a sermon with the people he lead in. In doing this, Romero goes against the authority, by doing the right thing and holding a Mass for the people who were forced out of the

Show More
Related

  • Mark Danner's The Massacre at El Mozote

    1433 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before reading this, I, like I am sure so many others, had no idea of the magnitude of injustices that can occur during these conflicts. Also, this was not very long ago, nor far away, and it speaks volumes of the differences in government ideology and politics. El Salvador is an extreme case of how a government will treat its citizens. Massacre at El Mozote truly was an eye-opener and I doubt I will soon forget it.

    Read More

  • The Major Players of the Iran-Contra Scandal

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    When focusing on Nicaragua one will need to pay close attention to the rebel group called the Sandinistas who took over Nicaragua’s previous dictator, Anastasio Somoza in 1979, in which the United States Congress decided it would be best to provide them with aid that lasted till 1981.1 Nicaragua’s geographic location made it a big concern for President Reagan based on his philosophy that surrounded the Reagan Doctrine. At that point, President Reagan ended the aid deal and adamantly advised that support be sent to those who were trying to over throw the new socialized, Sandinista leadership.2 Furthermore, the Nicaraguan’s were dealing with some of the worst warfare ever, by the mass killings that took place, which were at the mercy of death squads.3 This gruesome realization allowed President Reaga...

    Read More

  • Oscar Romero: School of the Americans

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...here were so against Romero those at the end disrespecting the law of God they still kill him in March 24 of 1980. Many of the Salvadorans decide not to listen to Romero in which between 1980 and 1989 more than 60,000 Salvadorans still got killed. But as good fighters for freedom and respect still goes on.

    Read More

  • Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman

    1815 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hilton, Ronald. “MEXICO: The Murder of Cardinal Juan Jesus Posadas Ocampo (1993).” Webmaster. N.p., 6 June 2003. Web. 15 April 2014.

    Read More

  • Chile and US Anti-Communism Affairs

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1960s America, the pope of democratic faith, preached to the world about the evils of communism. When Marxist Salvador Allende lost by three percent in the Chilean election of 1958, the United States decided that the next election of 1964, could not be left in the hands of democracy. The United States began to work to stop Allende from becoming president. They went so far as to create projects to help train and organize so-called anti-communists among the peasants, laborers, students, and the media. Despite their efforts, in 1970 Salvador Allende was elected president through plurality. He became the first Marxist in the world to gain power in a free democratic election. Now you might ask, why would the United States be so interested in the politics of a third world country, furthermore the beliefs of one man. After all a person can only do so much, right?

    Read More

  • Women In El Salvador Essay

    627 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War in El Salvador lasted from 1980 to 1992, and the El SAlvadoran government was doing their best to minimize the threat of their opposition. Their main opposition, The Frente Farabundo Marti Para La Liberacion Nacional; otherwise known as the FMLN, was a guerrilla group that was organized to fight the corruption in the country. 175). One of the main goals of the organization was to create a new society that is not degrading its citizens and promotes equality. Throughout El Salvador’s history, one organization to the next would run the country through repressive actions and social injustice. One of the main reasons that the FMLN fought the acting government were due to these social restraints on the lower- class citizens in El Salvador.

    Read More

  • Archbishop Romero: A Hero or Not?

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    Oscar Romero was born on August 15, 1917 in El Salvador. He was appointed Archbishop of El Salvador on February 23, 1977. When Romero was appointed as an Archbishop many priests were disappointed, especially those openly aligning with Marxism. On 12 March 1977, Rutilio Grande, a progressive Jesuit priest and personal friend of Romero who had been creating self-reliance groups among the poor campesinos, was assassinated do to what he was doing to help out the poor people in the community. His death had a profound impact on Romero, who later stated, "When I looked at Rutilio lying there dead I thought, 'If they have killed him for doing what he did, then I too have to walk the same path'". Romero urged the government to investigate, but they ignored his request. Romero started to investigate himself to see how he could help the people of the campesinos that have been kidnap. Later Romero spoke out against poverty, social injustice, assassinations and torture and the ones that were kidnap as political prisoners. When he spoke of this this brought many more enemies towards his way because they did no wanted a archbishop speaking of such things and saying that El Salvador government was not doing and this made the people with power furious and they decided to take actions in their hands. Also, Archbishop Oscar Romero utilized the broadcast as an oral newspaper: every documented case of killing, assault, disappearance, or torture – whether by the left or the right was broadcast. To let everyone know how El Salvador was and to show the ones with power that he was not afraid to talk about what was happening and why they weren’t doing their job in find out what was going on in the community.

    Read More

  • The Salvadorian Civil War

    2353 Words  | 5 Pages

    Beginning in the late 1970s Liberation Theology, Marxism, and U.S. Cold War policy collided in El Salvador culminating in a civil war that lasted over a decade and ultimately produced democratic political institutions that persist into the 21st century. Despite the prejudices against the church on behalf of government and media organizations in the U.S. and El Salvador, religious actors fought for human rights and the implementation of democratic institutions throughout the period of conflict. The Salvadoran Civil War, which occurred in the context of the Cold War, was one of the bloodiest and longest events in the history of Latin America after the Guatemalan Civil War. The conflict lasted from 1979 to 1992, left approximately 75,000 people dead, and a country in ashes. The conflict started after the fraudulent elections of the Coronel Arturo Armando Molina (1972), who focused his term on repressing the communist political parties that wanted to work for a social reform. This aroused the anger of the popular sectors, which started to organize groups and demonstrations demanding fair election and improvement of social conditions. The government responded to their demands with savage violence, focusing primarily on the oppression of campesinos because they were the ones who supported the revolutionary leftist forces. These actions alienated the Salvadoran population even more and caused many people in the Catholic Church to start denouncing the government’s actions. Thus, as the Civil War started to rise, the church started to radicalize and to and spoke up against the government’s actions. One of its most fervent advocates was Monsignor Oscar Arnulfo Romero, who during his short time as the Archbishop of San Salvador manifested hi...

    Read More

  • The Exponential Growth Of Gangs In Guatemala, El Salvador And Guatemala

    2244 Words  | 5 Pages

    By the end of the 2000s, while it seemed to many that there was no end in sight to the violence, behind the scenes senior gang leaders in El Salvador admitted to having grown tired of the gang warfare. Many of them, reflecting on the destruction the inter-gang violence had wrought on the communities in which their mothers, wives, children and grandchildren lived, felt compelled to look for a solution.... ... middle of paper ... ... Having grown increasingly frustrated with these rampant displays of impunity by gangs, the Salvadoran public pressured its government to prioritize public security above all else.

    Read More

  • CIA's Intervention In Guatemala

    2741 Words  | 6 Pages

    Gleijeses Piero. Shattered Hope The Guatemalan Revolution and The United States, 1944-1954. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.

    Read More

  • George Romero's Night of the Living Dead

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...eam, as Romero showcases the fact that the flaws shown within the characters end up turning their situation into something far worse than it had been in the beginning. It shows just how depraved, violent and absolutely terrifying humans can easily become when put into situations without consequences. Romero’s film is dredged in cynicism towards the modern American Dream, the way he deals with symbolism towards how “just” the American system is during battles and war, and how incredibly messed up our generalized view on racism and the ever ongoing struggle for certain ethnic groups to survive is. “The negativity of the characters extends, in fact, into every facet of their lives; indeed, the film implies the deepest denial of the goodness of effectiveness of every facet of human life in general. Every kind of human relationship is ridiculed or negated in the film.” 4

    Read More

  • El Salvador Civil War Analysis

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    War and violence in Central America is a result of governmental injustice due to the United States’ foreign policies. The United States supported El Salvador with weapons and money throughout the civil war. As a result of enforcing these policies, El Salvador’s poverty, population and crime rate increased. The books “.After.” by Carolina Rivera Escamilla and “The Tattooed Soldier” by Hector Tobar give us a glimpse of the issues Central Americans face.

    Read More

  • Oscar Romero

    359 Words  | 1 Pages

    By the killing and torturing of people Romero gets very angry and says STOP! In one scene while in prison listening to a priest get tortured, he doesn’t understand why one human being would do this to another. We are all human and why should their life be taken away if they have done nothing. The Church in this movie are people very strong in their faith and stand up for what they believe in. For example, When the people of one city walk right into a church that has been taken over by the military.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Mission El Salvador

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    Glenn embodies what it means to be a Country Team Member. With 19 agencies at Mission El Salvador, the majority law enforcement, Glenn is at the center of our security strategy and leads efforts to meet one of the Administration’s highest foreign policy priorities—reducing illegal migration to the United States. Every member of the team has a piece of the puzzle (in Glenn’s case – many pieces), but we need to see them all out on the table – otherwise, we simply implement good programs while never moving the ball on priority issues. Glenn does just that, and I trust his judgement and rely on his counsel.

    Read More

  • Justice in Romero

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    The influential and gripping film, " Romero", directed by John Duigan, portrays the life and death of Archbishop Oscar Romero. The movie shows the world through the eyes of the El Salvadorian people during the 1980's, when poverty and military rule flourished over the people. The country of El Salvador was run by an elite group of few who controlled most of the power and money, leaving the majority of the people deprived and powerless. This imbalance in the social system left much of the people under oppression, constantly controlled by the corrupt government and even sometimes persecuted when they tried to speak out. The church was a witness to the violations of human rights and this ruthless behavior by the El Salvadorian government towards its people caused a spark in the Catholic Church, a spark that ignited a flame of justice. Lead by Archbishop Romero, the church in El Salvador becomes a critic of the government, not because of political terms but because they are Christians looking for justice towards all people; so that all people have the potential to live life to its full meaning without any unnecessary obstacles holding them back. The movie "Romero" constantly portrays how the ideology of liberation theology plays a major role in the churches influence over the government, oppressed, and military in a search for social righteousness.

    Read More

More about Ethical Dilemmas Of El Salvador

Open Document