Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sympathy and Empathy
Response 2 At the end of chapter 12 we were asked to either respond if we either felt sympathy or empathy towards the characters. After finishing the reading I am leaning in the direction of feeling empathy towards the characters and not sympathy towards them because of their actions leading up to this point. The two main characters Duke and the attorney have taken their business trip to Las Vegas and turned it into a vacation.Their actions leading up to this point have been brought on themselves and they have to face the consequences for their actions. Duke should have not listened to his attorney from the very beginning, he should have reported the race that he was assigned to report on and he should have been more professional. He ends …show more content…
He has pulled a gun on Duke on more than one occasion. The first time it was because he asked him about his drugs and the second time it was in the hotel room. Friends are not supposed to pull guns on one another. His constant use of drugs makes his decision making to be questioned. The attorney orders 600 bars of soap from room service. When they run out of money he immediately leaves and Duke to clean up the mess the attorney has made while they were together. If I were to feel sympathy for anyone it would be for Duke, not the attorney. As I mentioned before, I'm leaning in the direction of empathy, I haven't been in a situation like Duke, but I can relate to the situation he is in because we have all been in a situation where we must face the consequences of our actions. At first Duke decides to run away from his problems, but then he realizes he is being pulled back towards Las Vegas by multiple signs, which include the police officer and the hitchhiker from the beginning of the story. He decides to own up for his actions and without the attorney around him he might actually have a chance of reporting the events that occur in the conference he is attending for drugs. If I were to put myself into Duke’s shoes I would want to make a new start in my life and turn things around. I would start to take my jobs more serious and try to avoid drugs because nothing good can come from them. I would choose my friends and colleagues with more caution and I would stay away from those people who cause trouble like the attorney. The attorney has left Duke by himself in Las Vegas with no money , a unregistered gun and a car full of illegal
After reading the story, I found I had mixed emotions about it. To explain, when we were getting into detail and finally finding out what really happened the day of June 28th, I found myself completely interested and glued to the book. I also enjoyed the way the incident was explained because I felt like I was there watching it all happen from the great detail. I enjoyed Phillips style of writing because through his writing, he really came off as an intelligent person who is very familiar with the legal system. The book is an easy read, and I liked the non-pretentious style of writing. I did not find myself struggling with reading the book at all, which made the overall experience that much more enjoyable.
Both characters had grown up in “ghetto” areas not far from one another and had pretty similar backgrounds. Which created the possibility that the author (Wes Moore) could have had the same fate as his incarcerated friend. What assisted in the prevention of the switch of fates would be the fact that we all have the ability to make wise decisions and it is only up to the individual to determine what will be the next step will be.
In the state of New Columbia, Alex Billings has accused CJ Pearson, previously a friend, of intentional infliction of emotional distress. This all started because CJ invited Alex to a “Go-go” and Alex wore a weird outfit. (30) All of the “distress” happened over text, on MyFace, and in person with comments that Pearson intended as jokes. CJ Pearson is not guilty of intentional infliction of emotional distress because one, he did not meet all of the requirements in his Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) test that the erudite professor gave him; and two, Alex Billings might have had another motive for staying home from school.
Ethan Couch was sentenced to ten years of probation and treatment, but no jail time after driving drunk and kill 4 people. His defense to not go to jail because he is a victim of affluenza that makes a lot of arguement. First, that is a official verdict of the court, so we cannot change it. In my opinion, being an “affluenza” person is not his choice because he grows up with the thought that he is on the top of everything. He was too pampered by his wealthy parents, but they did not educate him well. When he does a mistake, no one tell him that it is wrong, so he keep doing that. Athan Couch fells with his mind which lead to he does not know how to act right. He is not able to perceive as a normal person, so we cannot blame everything
had to go through in his life in his attempts for justice to be served.
felt ashamed after he got into trouble with the police and also felt sorry for his actions. These
He doesn’t care about his brother because he thinks that he is a big embarrassment to his family. He was a burden in many ways. The doctor had said that he mustn't get too excited, too hot, too cold, or too tired and that he must always be treated gently. (Paragraph:3 Page: 3) He did not love him he says this in a very vigorous tone and doesn't like his brother he thinks that he is kind of a disgrace to this family. It was bad enough having an invalid brother, but having one who possibly was not all there was unbearable, so I began to make plans to kill him by smothering him with a pillow. (Paragraph:5 Page: 2) This shows that he did have plans to kill him so of the defendant on the stand how can you explain that you did not kill your brother on purpose. "Don't hurt me, Brother," he warned. "Shut up. I'm not going to hurt you. I'm going to teach you to walk." I heaved him up again, and again he collapsed. (Paragraph:3 Page: 5) He treats his brother like trash and shows no compassion or loving toward his own sibling. He also says that he only did this so he would not be embarrassed so
Fear often invokes the fight or flight syndrome in which we are compelled to either battle the fear firsthand or to run from the source of the fear despite the consequences. In the case of Cory Goodine, being witness to the unforeseen murder of Jason Boyd by none other than his own friend Todd Johnston sent a ripple of fear and shock through his body and paralyzed his mind resulting in the unfortunate events following the murder. Cory Goodine should not have been charged with accessory after the fact and/or aiding and abetting because the murder was not a conspiracy, he was in shock and terrified, and he was simply acting in self-defence. Nonetheless, some may argue that he did still aid Johnston’ although he did not have much of a choice given
Originally when he is mentioned in this story he is shown to be "the ultimate top-dollar ambulance chaser" trying to make a living off others pain. It's assumed that he is amoral and cold-hearted. Yet, as the story progresses it gets more and more difficult to see him in this manner. He actually turns out to be a deeply compassionate presence in this novel and in the lives of those dealing with loss in the town of Sam Dent. It turns out that he comes to the town just as the other lawyers (having heard about the accident) looking for clients, but eventually starts to grow fond of the sleepy town and its people. The town slowly alters his involvement in the case as he befriends those he is representing. He even volunteers his legal advice to people, such as Risa Walker on divorce proceedings, after the case falls through. He also helps support the Walker's hotel by keeping a room there even when he is not in Sam Dent. His style of dress also changes fro...
I feel sympathy for Tray and Deborah for Tray his pride was shot and he is broken down
At one point in the story, Miles was at a bar and overheard a drunk talking about a guy named Otis and how he ran over Miles wife, and because Miles and Otis are not on each others good side, Miles rushes in and arrests Otis on the spot, pointing his gun at his head, ready to shoot when Otis gave any sign of struggle. Taking Otis in, Miles thought, ‘I don’t care. Otis is going to jail, no matter what happens to me. Otis will rot away in prison like he made me rot for two years.’ Miles has so much anger and depression from the death of his wife that if he hears anything about the person who killed Missy, even if it is from a drunk guy, that he will just rush in and take the guy down.
The ethical dilemma that Sarah finds herself engulfed in has many different ethical solutions depending on which ethical theory is being applied. I believe that a great ethical theory to apply in this certain situation would be Joseph Fletcher’s situational ethics. Fletcher states that “we must let go of the crutches of a system” and look at the specific situation being dealt with. He believes that the only unbreakable principle is love and that all other principles are merely guidelines. Therefore, I believe that Fletcher would advise Sarah to lie on her resume in order to keep her job. Fletcher believes that “it is better to sin bravely than to be too prideful or to hide behind systems.” No matter how her decision may affect her co-workers or
Autonomy – The ideal of self-determination is the basis for autonomy. It is important that a patient be allowed to decide what should be done to his or her own body. In other words, nobody else has the right to assert their power over another. Likewise, a physician should be allowed to decide not to perform a procedure if doing so would conflict with his or her values. In the Cruzan case, Nancy’s autonomy by way of her parents’ substituted judgment was overridden in favor of the State of Missouri’s policy to preserve life. Although the Supreme Court did not deny that Nancy had the right to refuse nutrition/hydration, there was not enough clear and convincing evidence to know that refusal was what Nancy truly wanted. Also, the autonomy of the hospital staff was taken into consideration because they did not feel it was right to withdraw treatment without a court’s consent. At first glance, it may seem that Nancy’s autonomy was not taken into consideration because her parents had to wait so long for the courts to agree to withdraw nutrition/hydration. However, the courts were actually erring on the side of caution because there was no advance directive indicating refusal of treatment as an option. Once Nancy’s parents found three more witnesses to attest to her wishes, the Supreme Court agreed that Nancy would have wanted refusal of treatment.
An ethical dilemma is a situation in which there is a choice to be made between two options, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. The term ethical means pertaining to, or dealing with morals or the principles of morality and the dilemma is a situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives or simply any difficult or perplexing situation or problem. Most of us will encounter a fair share of these ethical dilemmas. To deal with these dilemmas, we have a decision making process that we go through. Now there are plenty of instances that can be considered an ethical dilemmas and even many more that might seem like they could be but are not. I will inform you on how to decipher
Moral and Ethical Dilemmas One of the most difficult trials I face in my life are ethical and moral. dilemmas. The snares are a lot of fun. They can be soul-wrenching and searching experiences that tax my. character and cause me to really "put my money where my mouth is.