Essay On Treaty Settlement

1162 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impacts of the Treaty of Versailles

To what extent can the treaty settlements at the end of World War I be considered ‘harsh and short-sighted’?
It can be argued that the treaty settlements at the end of World War I were largely short-sighted but only partially harsh. The Treaty of St Germain which dealt with Austria was harsh as it led to severe economic problems in Austria. Not only the treaty of St Germain, but the Treaty of Versailles, dealing with Germany, also imposed harsh military restrictions on Germany. The treaty settlements were short-sighted as it led to the rise of Nazi Germany and resulted in the power vacuum in central Europe. However, it cannot be said that the treaty settlements were completely harsh as the economical and territorial terms of the Treaty of Versailles were reasonable and not impossible for Germany to abide by.
The Treaty of St Germain, signed in 1919 between the Allies and Austria, aimed for the recognition of the split of the Austria-Hungarian Empire into the two separate republics Austria and Hungary. The Allies felt that Austria was, to a certain extent, responsible for the war. As such, Austria was made to take certain responsibility for war damage and was ordered to pay reparations in goods and services. The treaty also involved major reshuffling of Austrian territory such as the loss of Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina (contributing to the formation of Southern Slav kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, renamed Yugoslavia). Austria also lost the territories Galicia, South Tyrol, Istria amongst many others. This redistribution of territories led to Austria’s loss of almost all its industrially rich regions and about 15 million of its population. This huge debt to pay for war damage, accompanied by its inability to pay due to t...

... middle of paper ...

...a part of Germany. Also, for the Saar, the Saar inhabitants were to be offered a plebiscite after 15 years also for them to decide whether they wished to return to Germany, be a part of France, or remain under the supervision of the League of Nations. The residents in these areas were given a chance to choose who they wanted to rule them, in line with the aim of self-determination. This shows that the treaty settlements were not harsh but instead fair on the part that the people were given the right to decide what they wanted politically and were entitled self-determination.
To sum up, the treaty settlements were very short-sighted as it did not bring about long lasting peace in Europe but instead, brewed more unrest and hostility. However, on the part of being harsh, the treaty settlements were only partially harsh as some terms were harsh while others reasonable.

Show More
Related

  • Operation Valkyrie: An Assassination Attack On Adolf Hitler

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    ..., and gone easier on them than the treaties that were made after they had been defeated.

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Guadalupe Hidalgo Essay

    1185 Words  | 3 Pages

    In February, 1848 Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ending the war with America, albeit under the threat of total domination by the United States. Although not agreed upon in a mutual sense, Mexico did work diligently to ensure the rights of its peoples still homesteading within the border region. Specific provisions were set forth within the document that guaranteed free passage within the region, respect for worldly possessions, protection under U.S. law, and the ability to make a decision pertaining to citizenship under Mexican or American rule. However, with as admirable of a document the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo appeared on paper, its practices were far less diligent in defending the rights of the Mexican-Americans caught

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Versailles Perception Vs Reality

    1436 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reality and perception both played a crucial role in the making of the Treaty of Versailles and how people reacted to it, but it was the way that perceptions were made a reality and how this made people change their thinking that led to the fail of the Treaty. Perception played an important role in the way reality was viewed in the Treaty of Versailles. It is the way that you perceive reality that is more important and effective than just reality alone. Anthony J D’Angelo once said, “Reality doesn’t bite, rather our perception of reality bites.”

    Read More

  • How Did The Versailles Treaty Help The World War II?

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    The pent up emotions eventually led to the rise of the Nazi Party and Adolf Hitler, who were angered by their loss of territory, military restrictions, economic reparations, and the war guilt clause. The stipulations of the Versailles Treaty were aimed at bringing down Germany and making it as weak as possible. One of the solutions the the victors came up with was to take territory away from Germany, resulting in the country losing more than forty percent of its coal producing areas. They took away the Polish Corridor, parts of East Prussia, parts of Denmark, as well as Lorraine-Alsace (Doc A). Taking away the Polish Corridor put Germany in a difficult position, as it geographically split Germany into two pieces.

    Read More

  • The Treaty of Versailles

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people in other lands thought that the treaty was a way of making legal the punishment on the Germans and this was in violation of Wilsonian idealism. The peacemakers should have been able to set aside hatred that was built up from the past in order to come up with a more proper and fair settlement. Instead of doing this, they placed the blame on the Germans by forcing them to pay for reparations they couldn't afford, insulting them with the accusation of guilt from the war and taking away their territory. The treaty would only intensify the hatred felt by all the parties involved in the treaty and heighten German nationalism. This was a poor beginning for democracy in Germany and for Wilson's New World.

    Read More

  • The Tanzimat: Reform in the Ottoman Empire

    1633 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...and military restrictions were implemented. Armenia, and various other independent states were established as a result of the treaty. The empire lost about 80 percent of its original landmass, and eventually declined and fell entirely.

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Versailles is Justified

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    World War I was ultimately ended in 1918 after the Treaty of Versailles was signed. Peace settlements were signed on June 28, 1918 at the Hall of Mirror in Versailles, Paris. The Treaty was an agreement among the United States, Great Britain, and France. Woodrow Wilson, George Clemenceau, and David Lloyd, who represented the "Big Three" countries, collaborated in negotiating the Treaty. The Treaty of Versailles was designed to weaken Germany and give Germany full blame for causing the war. The Treaty implemented massive reparations to Germany which would obliterate Germany's economy, notwithstanding the millions of dead allied soldiers. The settlement strictly limited the German's military. Germans were additionally forced to depart from their homes in Russia, Poland, and Alsace-Lorraine and return to Germany or Austria. Furthermore Germany had to give back any land belonging to other countries. With no alternative, Germany signed the peace settlements. The Treaty of Versailles was undoubtedly justified, Germany was positively the main instigator of the war and its excessive brutality of fighting provoked the war more particularly. Thus, making the amends to Germany was rational because of all the destruction Germany had triggered.

    Read More

  • How Did Ww1 Affect The Canadian Economy

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles, which was signed after World War I, was supposed to ensure peace by imposing harsh conditions on Germany in the form of reparations. Canadian, American, and other delegates warned that the reparations were too severe. In the end, the Treaty ended up crippling Germany and Austria with war debts that guaranteed another war: World War II. Although the Treaty of Versailles, in itself, did not impact Canadian economy that much, World War II

    Read More

  • What Role Does Russia Play In The Treaty Of Berlin

    382 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Treaty of Berlin (1878) would turn out to be one of the most imperative treaties to the development of World War I. The nationalistic and imperialistic desires for each country played a major role in what they demanded during negotiations. In order to unite the Slavic people of the Balkans, Serbia wanted to establish a pure slavic state. Austria-Hungary sought to get more land and stop the Pan-Slavic movement that would endanger the health and peace of the kingdom. In addition, Russia sought to amalgamate and emancipate the Slavic groups from the Ottomans, gain influence in the Balkans, and obtain respect in the eyes of their European contemporaries. However, Britain and France attempted to limit Russia’s involvement in the Balkans and

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Versailles Essay

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles, one of the most controversial international agreements(“D.1. The Treaty of Versailles."), had been negotiated between January and June of 1919 (History. Staff). Although it was negotiated between January and June, the Treaty of Versailles was officially signed on June 28, 1919 (Hashall) at Versailles, a suburb of Paris (Benson). This treaty involved Germany and all allies of World War I (Benson). The peace agreement was established to aid in the termination of World War I.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The Treaty Of Versailles Fair

    533 Words  | 2 Pages

    As World War I ended, with great power and craftsmanship The Treaty Of Versailles was created. But, was all of it's content fair or well rounded for the situation at hand? To counter my points, the composers of the treaty as well as those opposed to Germany and their ways. They want to make Germany pay for what they caused, and this is how they believe it to be fair, even though that shall be debated. This peace treaty was made to put a close to the war between The Allies and Germany. The treaty put all the blame of the war on Germany, as well as imposed new rules affected Germany’s money income, land, and citizens. It has sent Germany into a rough time economically, and eventually the whole country was bombarded by the Nazis and Hitler. Now, that it was the German’s fault to this war. I believe that some of the regards put on them should have been lightened.

    Read More

  • The Habsburg Monarchy

    2987 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Compromise of 1867 was the result of the weakness of the Habsburg Empire after the defeat of the battle of Sadowa in 1866 in which its influences of control in Venetia and the German Confederation were lost. John W. Mason argues that the Compromise was a way for the Habsburgs to preserve itself against ’the Russians in the Balkans’(2) and was also a way of strengthening the empire against the rise of Slav nationalism. The Compromise however caused great outrage and resentment among the minorities in both halves of the empire. The most significant outcome was the rise in Czec...

    Read More

  • Paris Peace Conference

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    It has been almost a century since the first Paris Peace Conference was hold, but even until now, it is a popular yet also controversial event in the history of the world. The Paris Peace Conference took place in 1919 involving more than 1,000 representatives from over 30 nations. The results of the Conference are five treaties regarding terms that, according to the Conference, shall prevent any upcoming conflicts among nations. Although World War II started only after 15 years, nonetheless, the treaties did function as a buffer between countries. Although many resolutions were discussed, the negotiation of the Conference revolves around four main topics, reparation from the previous war losses or limitations on the main Central Power, Germany, self-recognition, President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points, and the annexation of land.

    Read More

  • Peace is More than the Absence of War

    2217 Words  | 5 Pages

    The lives and prosperity of millions of people depend on peace and, in turn, peace depends on treaties - fragile documents that must do more than end wars. Negotiations and peace treaties may lead to decades of cooperation during which disputes between nations are resolved without military action and economic cost, or may prolong or even intensify the grievances which provoked conflict in the first place. In 1996, as Canada and the United States celebrated their mutual boundary as the longest undefended border in the world, Greece and Turkey nearly came to blows over a rocky island so small it scarcely had space for a flagpole.1 Both territorial questions had been raised as issues in peace treaties. The Treaty of Ghent in 1815 set the framework for the resolution of Canadian-American territorial questions. The Treaty of Sevres in 1920, between the Sultan and the victorious Allies of World War I, dismantled the remnants of the Ottoman Empire and distributed its territories. Examination of the terms and consequences of the two treaties clearly establishes that a successful treaty must provide more than the absence of war.

    Read More

  • Informal Settlement Essay

    3079 Words  | 7 Pages

    Having set the aims, objectives and research questions in the first chapter, this chapter zooms in to review literature available on the subject of land tenure regularization and its effect on housing investment from different parts of the world with specific reference to cities. The emphasis of this chapter is to analyse the link between land tenure regularization and housing investment in informal settlements. Also, the focus is on securing land rights in informal settlements, since it is widely believed that regularization of informal settlement rights leads to (increased) access to formal finance which subsequently encourages housing investment (Chome and McCall, 2005). The chapter starts with contextual definition of key terms, and then followed by global documentation on the impact of tenure regularization in informal settlement, focusing on the experiences of some selected countries. Since the aim of the research is to investigate the effect of land tenure regularization on informal housing investment and that both the Zambian Local Authorities and the government have intention to regularize informal settlements, lessons learnt from the case study countries will be noted, after which the chapter will be concluded in section 2.6 by way of a summary.

    Read More

More about Essay On Treaty Settlement

Open Document