On The Waterfront Essay

1098 Words3 Pages

1954: As the dust kicked up by the nationalistic yet fearful time in American history called the Second Red Scare began to settle, one of the most influential films in American, and international, film history hits Hollywood. Directed by the infamous Elia Kazan, On the Waterfront tells the story of a young Terry Malloy, ex-prize fighter and current dock worker who is suppressed by the corrupt boss of the docker’s union. Disgusted by the union’s manipulation of its workers and horrified by its murder of his brother, Terry informs local officials of the union’s malfeasance, in what is widely recognised as a parallel to Kazan’s “naming names” of eight of his colleagues to the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in 1952. Those accused …show more content…

He reflects on his selection of theme: “In some way the channel of the film should also be in my own life...In some subtle or not-so-subtle way, every film is autobiographical. A thing in my life is expressed by the essence of the film”(Stevens). In his most famous, On the Waterfront, widely regarded as one of the greatest films in the history of international cinema, Kazan emulates his retrospective feelings about his involvement in the Communist party when he was a member of the group theater. When the aforementioned protagonist, Terry Malloy, “rats” on the corrupt Johnny Friendly and remarks that “[he] was rattin' on myself all those years,” Kazan is explaining his temporary seduction into the American Communist party, and his disappointment in this former state of being from the vantage of a sober mind. Johnny Friendly’s coercing of Terry to set up the death of a dock worker who was about to testify parallels the manipulated feeling Kazan experienced when the Communist cell he attended demanded that he fill his beloved Group Theater with fellow communists. Each facet of On the Waterfront is filled with an ingrained passion derived from the pressures and criticisms Kazan faced during his HUAC ordeal. The emotions he distilled in his film, much like those of his enthusiastic actors, were genuine; this is what made his films resonate with such vibrancy to his viewers. He noted that all he was “concerned about...was to say something artistically that was uniquely [his]

Open Document