Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Post colonial history of sudan
Most important events , people, and terms for the sudanese civil war
Post colonial history of sudan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Post colonial history of sudan
The Second Sudanese War is one of the world’s major religious wars caused by conflict between Islam and Christianity. It lasted for over 22 years, from 1983 to 2005, mainly between the Sudanese government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army. Despite its origins in Southern Sudan, the war spilled over to the Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains regions causing 4 million people in Sudan to be displaced. Their deprivation is further exacerbated by the significant human rights abuses under the regime. The government of Sudan had been accused of imposing “appalling suffering” on several million of Sudanese citizens. It was approximated that when the war ended, Sudan contained over 6.1 million internally displaced people.
As Africa’s most expansive and equally divergent country, Sudan’s demographics include religious, ethnic and socio-economic divides. After Sudan gained independence from the British Colonization, the nation was left vulnerable as the north and south failed to cooperate.
The Second Sudanese War also is portrayed as a conflict between regional powers and the central government. The competition between foreign interest and the two opposing parties over the oil fields sparked disputes over the natural resources between the regions, further intensifying the war. The Northern Sudan’s desire to to gain control over the natural resources is driven by the reality their arid geography prevents them from cultivating agriculture. In addition,when Omar Al-Bashir’s coup overthrew the Sudanese government and revoked the peace agreement back in 1989, both regions failed to acquiesce in a peace treaty due to the major scale of the conflict. Frequent aerial bombardments and helicopter attacks from the Government of Sudan aggravate the ra...
... middle of paper ...
...se high inflation in Sudan. Moreover, the fighting in Darfur and the Protocol Areas led to internal displacement as well as a large outflow of refugees into Ethiopia during 2011 and 2012. The Doha Document for Peace marked many voluntary returns of IDPs and refugees. Nevertheless, recent violence in Darfur in July and August 2012 prompted more internal displacement.
Internally Displaced Persons in eastern Sudan face obstacles such as poverty, lack of access to health care, employment and education. Though numerous IDPs return to the place of origin, many areas lack basic services and infrastructure and people remain malnutritioned. For Refugees, many fail to integrate locally and continuous drought has reduced the quality of life in neighboring countries. Hundred of thousands of Sudanese people are unable to prove their identity and are at risk of statelessness.
Sudan, which is located in northeast Africa, is ranked number 190 based on the amount of migrants per thousand people with a total of -4.44 migrants per thousand people. For roughly 12 years (from 2001-2013), Sudan has faced many challenges that push it’s people out of the land and pull them towards other places. These factors are known as push and pull factors. Even though there are many challenges that come with immigration, the results are more rewarding than what they would have been in Sudan. After migrating out of Sudan, these Sudanese migrants also face long-term consequences because of their decision to move.
Reeves, Eric, Massimo Calabresi, Sam Dealey, and Stephan Faris. “The Tragedy of Sudan.” Time. Time Inc, 4 Oct. 2004. Web and Print. 15 April 2014. .
The lost boys of Sudan view war as bad luck, since they have no control over violence in their region. The lost boys did not choose to be born within these two groups, and are not willing to participate in violent activities, in their environment. The boys are not supportive of the war, and it is from this reason that they are fleeing away from their home country to avoid recruitment into militia groups (Ajak, 2006). Therefore, war causes separation of family members and disintegration of ethnic groups. People lose their ethnic identities during instances of war as they seek refuge in new environments. According to the boys, war leads to premature death, fear, hunger, disability, violence, displacement and diseases. War exposes people to more harm than during peaceful periods (Ajak, 2006). The lost boys feel that war is a threat to their lives and schooling. It is a tradition for...
In 1898, Britain and Egypt took control over Sudan. This didn’t include Darfur, which was an independent territory ruled by a sultan. In 1916, Britain added Darfur to the territory it controlled. After World War II, in 1945, Britain and Egypt began preparing Sudan for independence. From 1945-1989, Darfur -remote from Khartoum and having invaluable resources- suffered neglect from all governments. Sudan has been independence since 1956. However, the journey that led to Sudan’s genocide in Darfur began in the late 1800s. It’s a complicated tale that involves conquest; internal politics; social, ethnical, racial, and re...
In this section, I will provide a brief history of U.S. military involvement on the African continent, starting with the Barbary Wars and working up through the current date. This historical documentation will highlight the change in the role the United States has played in Africa [post 9-11???]. Prior to 9-11, the United States’ interactions were mainly [capture summary here]. Since [?], however, the continent has faced a marked increase in violent extremism and terrorism leading the United States to partner with many African nations in counterterrorism initiatives. These, and other initiatives, mean an increasing number U.S. service members are deploying to Africa to take part in training, humanitarian issues and military operations. These military activities are run by United States African Command, a recently created combatant command.
After the withdraw of Egypt and Britain, Sudan has been run by a number rickety / unstable government groups and milit...
The Sudanese Civil War was a fight between the central Sudanese government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, which occurred from 1983 to 2005. It was mainly a continuation of the First Sudanese
In 1983 the Second Sudanese Civil War took place; Arabic Muslims from the North of Sudan attacked southern villages killing more than one million civilians and leaving more than twenty thousand of boys orphaned− often referred to as the Lost Boys of Sudan−. Afraid of meeting the same fate as their families, these boys set out on a difficult journey through Africa seeking refuge.
Tadesse, Debay. Post-independence South Sudan: the challenges ahead. ISPI-ISTITUTO PER GU STUDI DI POLITICA INTERNAZIONALE. February 2012.no.46.
"IRIN Middle East | SYRIA: Wealth gap widening as inflation hits poor | Syria | Economy." IRIN • humanitarian news and analysis from Africa, Asia and the Middle East - updated daily. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2012
In their book, “Enough, Why the World’s Poorest Starve in an Age of Plenty,” authors Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman mention that Sudan, as a country, would have been able to produce much produce from planting, but because of two decades of fighting, the farming land has been diminished into battle grounds (116). In the year of 2003, the agricultural aspect of the country was completely destroyed by the burning of agricultural produce, such as seeds, animals were killed, and farming equipment, destroyed, says the authors “The master plan in Khartoum was that there would be no recovery- at least not until the rebellion was squashed.” (115). Obviously this was a government that was willing to attack where it hurt. It supported the Janjaweed’s raid- “composed mainly of Arab nomads and cattle herders”- against the African Farmers (115). With the farmers in the refugee camps, there was no one to continue the cycle of planting and even so, they would not have been able to do so because the Janjaweed
The rise of this conflict can be traced back to European colonialism. As the British Empire continued to expand it incorporated Sudan into it’s empire in the 1890s. However at the time, Sudan was not the Sudan that is knew pre-2011. There were two a North and a South Sudan. The north was predominatingly a Arabic speaking Muslim North, and the south an English speaking Christian South. To prevent Egypt claiming North Sudan, the British combined the two regions into one. It can be classified as this being the start of the conflict. The two regions, were culturally,religiously, and ethnically different. Tensions were bound to rise based on these issues. When the British colonialism ended and Sudan declared independence in 1956, the borders were not altered. The country was still united into one Sudan. The British like most Colonial powers left the nation with an unstable government structure. The British supported the North more than it did the South, thus creating resentment and tensions between the two after the end of colonialism.
“The current population of Sudan is 41,139,779 as of Thursday, February 15, 2018, based on the latest United Nations estimates.” There are all of these people that live in this country and most of them are suffering. Alot of people in sudan do not have access to electricity or water. The people of Sudan speak Arabic or English. Sudan is the third largest country in Africa. After viewing the video provided, I discovered things about American culture.
A. Starting in 1948, right in the middle of the Arab-Israeli war, the initiation of the Arab League boycott of Israel was a coherent effort by Arab League member states, whose intention was to isolate Israel financially and economically (Perez). The League ventured effortlessly to prevent Arab states and disincentivize non-Arabs from providing support to Israel or adding to Israel's economic stability. The boycott was also designed to deter Jewish immigration to the region (Consequences of the War). There was a total of 22 Middle Eastern and African countries that supported the boycott and its effort to prevent any and all economic growth in Israel. Throughout the period of this ongoing boycott, many trade barriers have been put in place, limiting trade between Israel and other countries (Slavicek 65).