Essay On Subjective Well-Being

2781 Words6 Pages

The basis of our study is the subjective well-being approach for our undergraduate thesis writing which shows that there is a weak relationship between subjective well-being and indicators of well-being such as income and consumption (Kahneman et al. 1999; Argyle 2002).
There were three reasons for the existence of a weak relationship between subjective well-being and indicators of well-being such as income and consumption, first, a person is much more than a consumer; second, the role of heterogeneity in human perceptions; and third, the existence of heterogeneity in purposes of life. The understanding of poverty would be better served by a concept of human well-being which incorporates subjective well-being indicators and which is based on the wholeness and complexity of human beings. It is reasonable to accept that a poor person is one whose well-being is low; poverty depends on the specific concept of human well-being (Kahneman et al. 1999; Argyle 2002)
Subjective well-being refers to the well-being as declared by a person. It is based on a person’s answer to either a single question or a group of questions about his/her well-being, it is a measure of a person’s well-being that incorporates all life events, aspirations, achievements, failures, emotions and relations of human beings, as well as their neighboring cultural and moral environment. (Kahneman et al. 1999; Argyle 2002).
In this paper we consider the relationship between “subjective wellbeing poverty” and poverty itself. This paper attempts to discuss facts about subjective poverty and give the readers valuable information about subjective poverty and its contingent financing of the selected household in our locale of our study which is the household of Miniforest B...

... middle of paper ...

...emale-headed household. There are three assumptions arising from the role of household heads. The first assumptions are that the household head is mainly responsible for the economic well-being of the household, and that women relative to men are disadvantaged in accessing society's economic resources and opportunities. Second assumptions imply that although the household head must ensure the economic sustainability of the household irrespective of his or her sex, the means available to do so are not gender neutral. The third assumption arises from research that suggests that the gender of the head of household affects both the manner in which household resources are utilized and disbursed within the household, and the manner in which households are networked for exchange of resources with other households (Lloyd and Gage-Brandon, 1993; Haddad, 1990; Bruce, 1989).

Open Document