Essay On Organisational Change

1480 Words3 Pages

According to Dawson (1994) organisational change therefore refers to any alteration in activities or tasks. It is a modification or transformation of the organisations structure, processes, or goals. It may involve minor changes in procedures and or operations or transformational changes brought about by rapid expansion into international markets, mergers, or major restructuring. McLagan (2002) claims that “the phenomenon of change has become a central management issue in modern organisations and whilst it has always been an issue, creating, sustaining and managing change continues to be a challenge in today’s society” (p. 28). Change is also expensive, onerous, and has an intellectually demanding effect. These effects are experienced as organisations try to implement complex, unprecedented, organisation wide proposals such as reengineering, diversity interventions, globalisation, installing quality and productivity programmes, or entering into intricate agreements, mergers and acquisitions. According to Paton and McCalman, (2001) change is therefore an inseparable part of organisations, and it will certainly “not disappear or dissipate” (p. 5). Organisations no longer have a choice: they are pressured to change or else face their possible downfall moreover the rate of organisational change is clearly accelerating today. The content of organisational change refers to the particular areas of transformation that are being examined. According to Walsham, (1993) the organisation may be seeking to change technology, products, systems, manpower, geographical positioning, or corporate culture. The process of organisational change refers to the actions, reactions, and interactions from various interested parties in an attempt to move the ...

... middle of paper ...

...d Mayson (2005) the standardization of university education in connection with its commercialisation and the wide spread of flexible precarious forms of teachers’ employment, undermine the autonomy of faculty and destroy professional skills. Here we should note that if the true creator of knowledge is an integrated personality that can express innovative ideas, think systematically, perceive holistically and in depth a number of subjects, then the progress of cognitive activity in society can be achieved through the provision of the optimum conditions for the education of people in terms of multifaceted cultivation of their personality. However, in the mass universities of modern capitalist society, the education of the many is downgraded into the acquisition of fragmented information, without the potential for substantial development of their intellectual skills.

Open Document