Essay On Humour In Humour

733 Words2 Pages

In terms of perceptual response, Humour has been defined as the extent to which audience perceives message to be humorous and/or entertaining (Sternthal and Craig, 1973). A large number of scholars have researched the humour in advertising by focusing on the effectiveness of humorous and non-humorous advertisements. Proponents state that humour appeals that use in an advertisement are aiming to evoke a feeling of amusement - trigger positive emotion (Sabri, 2014). However, the opposing views appear that humour could lead to the negative impact (e.g. negative brand attitude (Sabri, 2014). One reason might be that humour is not universal - the amusements or gags of humour are different concerning the cultural value. Therefore, not every type of humour is effective to all recipients.

The literature on Lee and Lim (2008) revealed the effectiveness of humorous advertisement under the cultural orientations. To guide consumer behaviour, the Hofstede cultural dimension has been applied: individualism-collectivism, and the …show more content…

It found that with the use of positive ads cognition, the negative ads- related cognitions is reduced and the purchasing intention is increased (ibid). However, Chattopadhyay and Basu (1990), observed the impact of humorous advertisements on brand attitude by using the conceptualization of cognitive responses as the mediators to study found that although humour is best when reinforcing favourable attitudes of a loyal customer, it is less effective in the introductory stage of the new product (ibid). The researchers highlighted that the attention of message claim may be taken away and the ability in learning about the brand of the recipient might be reduced (ibid). However, Chattopadhyay and Basu (1990) research was conducted on only single humour advertisement, in which different types of humorous execution should be further

Open Document