Essay On Google

1864 Words4 Pages

1. Discuss competition in the search industry. Which of the five competitive forces seem strongest? Weakest? What is your assessment of overall industry attractiveness?
Search engine industry is built on finding out and also aggresive advertising. As we know there are five major competitors in this industry competing with Google. The competition is strong because they are targeting the same market, presenting similar business and technologies. The five major competitors are Yahoo!, MSN, Baidu, Bing, and AOL. o Bargaining power of buyers- in both 2007 and 2008, 97% of Google’ revenues came from advertising alone and the 3% was from other businesses. The advertisement customers have bargaining power because Google relies on its advertisement turnover too much. In addition, since this industry is relatively new, there are still growth opportunities for Google’s current or potential competitors which result in high bargaining power of buyers.

o Bargaining power of suppliers- talent people are Google’s suppliers. It’s difficult to find someone with the knowledge and skill that it values, and so Google has a lot of benefits and flexible working schedule to attract and keep them in company. Therefore, suppliers also have a high bargaining power.

o Substitute- there is a few powerful or suitable substitutes that can replace Google.

o Potential entries- Internet search engine industry has a low barrier to prohibit new potential entries to enter. Current big players exhibit a high technology and a lot of technological know-how’s. Although the barrier is low, new entries must provide better and quicker search results then other competitors. They have to win others with better and quicker service, which can be really hard.

o Rivalry -the ...

... middle of paper ...

...uting. Attract Microsoft’s customers, first by Google search, well established services and then also with cloud computing.

5. Manage the Google brand Keep on avoiding marketing. Anticipate, support, expand user’s bond with the Google brand by anticipating their needs, and developing tools that meet them. Allow users to have interactive access and control over their own personal information, increasing its usefulness and building trust in Google’s brand.

6. Support public education: critical issues impacting Internet access Net neutrality, open access and interoperability across platforms is very important. Reduced cost of personal training.

7. Invest also in internet security Safe (without viruses,…) information, applications can become more and more important and valued
References
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37625598/Management-Study-Google-Case-Marjan-Suban

Open Document