Essay On Economic Systems

1269 Words3 Pages

There are four main types of economic systems; traditional, market, command, and mixed. Each of these systems is unique to itself but is also similar in some aspects to the others. Some of the ways in which these systems are different but yet the same are through their property rights, competition, and profits. Each system benefits differently through each of these factors. They all strive for the same purpose though, to survive. To bring their people happiness. To thrive and expand. Traditional economic systems are simply traditional. They focus on family and close bonds so they are usually smaller groups. Competition is pretty much obsolete. Each family usually produces only a few goods but a wide amount of them so that they can be traded …show more content…

While the words socialism and communism are used interchangeably there are differences. One of the main differences is that socialism still allows for some democracy while communism eliminates it entirely. Socialism is based on theory that everything should be distributed evenly throughout a society. In order to achieve this idea the government has to have a control of the economy, so they take control of the large companies that change the economy the quickest. Communism is based on the philosophy of socialism. It is categorized as a centrally planned government with the government having full control of the economic and political powers. Communism is known as an authoritarian government. Centrally planned governments allow for very little competition if any at all. What competition they do allow is simply to boost the economy and to give the people the illusion of choice. In the Soviet Union there was no competition at all because the government controlled what was being produced and for how much it was being sold for. The government also controlled how much all the workers made. If they reached the quota that the government asked for they kept their jobs and had a steady flow of income and if they went over their quota it was more profit for the government and nothing extra for the workers. This philosophy led to workers just doing the bare minimum because why …show more content…

No one system has all the answers. Centrally planned economies are troublesome, do not met the needs of their consumers and limit their freedom. Traditional economies have little room for growth or change. Market economies cannot protect their consumer’s property rights which could allow one company to dominate. Mixed economies are by far the best option but depending on the variation of the mix it can have its downfalls as well. No system is great and none has all the answers. Each system works where it is at and at the same time would not work at another

Open Document