Essay Comparing The Necklace And The Story Of An Hour

884 Words2 Pages

“The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant and “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin were both undeniably exceptional short stories to flip through and interpret, both enjoyable as well as indulgent with a deeper meaning that leaves readers contemplating their messages long after they’ve finished reading. The two stories were particularly easy to compare because of their similar themes involving gender roles as well as marriage norms, even though they differ in time and setting. In “The Story of an Hour”, Louise Mallard, a woman burdened by fatal heart problems, handles the death of her husband in the most appalling and perturbing of ways. Louise, rather than feeling numb and overcome with grief, is elated, overjoyed with her newfound freedom when she is told her husband Brently is deadㅡonly to discover he is actually alive in the closing paragraphs. Contrarily, Mathilde Loisel in …show more content…

She is constantly whining about how plain and uninteresting her life is, even though she has a comfortable home and loving husband. Having what most would kill for, she still dreams of a world of gold and wealth; a reality of extravagance and luxury that is chalk-full of rich, exciting people and parties. Fundamentally restated, she is a vain, thankless woman who possesses the steadfast credence she was born to live a better life. Monsieur Loisel, her husband, on the other hand, is a hardworking, modest man who enjoys the unpretentious simplicity of his life, completely satisfied with the food that is cooked for him as well as his routine job at the Ministry of Education. When invited to a formal ball, Mathilde borrows a necklace seemingly expensive and misplaces it. After searching diligently for it—and coming up empty handed—they replace it without telling Madame Forrestier and work and save for the next ten

Open Document