Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Formal analysis on an art piece
Formal analysis on an art piece
Artwork analysis example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Spending time looking at art is a way of trying to get into an artists’ mind and understand what he is trying to tell you through his work. The feeling is rewarding in two distinctive ways; one notices the differences in the style of painting and the common features that dominate the art world. When comparing the two paintings, The Kneeling Woman by Fernand Leger and Two Women on a Wharf by Willem de Kooning, one can see the similarities and differences in the subjects of the paintings, the use of colors, and the layout The first and most obvious similarity is both paintings are about women. Although the subjects in both works of art are women, the Two Women on a Wharf painting appear to have heavy hearts and look to be consoling each other, …show more content…
Also, since it’s hard for the viewer to see any emotion the women are feeling in either painting by looking at their faces, the two painters appear to have used colors to create the tone. The feeling of gloom that surrounds the two women on a wharf with the color suggests that they have not found what they have been looking for so their sorrow will last a little longer. The kneeling woman has a brighter background probably depicting that she has found solace or love where she currently kneels. Between the two paintings, the kneeling woman seems to have a brighter looking future ahead of her. The layout of the two paintings is quite different. The layout in the Kneeling Woman for instance, is that of straight apparent lines and shapes while the lines in the Two Women on a Wharf are faded out by the artist and creates more of a chaos tone. This is perhaps why the two artists decided to name their paintings the way they did as a clue to what the viewer is looking at. The Two Women on a Wharf comes out as a painting done on the spur of the moment whereas the Kneeling Woman appears to have been a carefully thought out painting that necessitated prior
Not only that, even though they both have some similarity to each other, I notice more difference than similarity in the portraits. Portrait of Isabella d'este was made in 1534-1536 on oil on wood with dark black brown background. Unlike the Portraits of a Lady who looked down during her portraits, Isabella d'este is looking up but not directly towards the viewers. While observing more on both portraits, I notice the light that shined down on Isabella d'este is coming from her right top corner of the painting. On the other hand, Portraits of a Lady were made in 1460 on oil on oak panel with the light source coming from the left top
Rachel Ruysch and Georgia O’Keeffe were two great women artists working over two centuries apart but despite that they painted the similar subjects, they couldn’t have been more different in the ways they painted them and their reasons for doing so. Rachel Ruysch used still life and flowers to become a prominent painter in a time where women couldn’t study anatomy or have models which was a much more prominent subject during her time. Georgia O’Keeffe, on the other hand, denies all connection of her gender and her paintings.
Throughout history art has played a major role in society. It started out with paintings and went to photography and eventually to films. Artistic interpretation depended on whom the artist was and what he or she wanted to present to the audience. When it came to portraiture, whether it was paintings or photography, the idea of mimesis was very important. However important this may have been, the portraits were mostly products of the media and fashions during that time period. Whatever was popular during the time was used such as columns or curtains in the background. The face was the main focus in the painting and there was little focus on the body. Later on during photography the body was focused on more. Even though photography was used much later after paintings were used, it allowed the artist even more artistic interpretation because of the ability to play a different role and not having to be ones self. The artists that will be focused on are Frida Kahlo and Cindy Sherman. They lived during different periods and their artistic intentions varied because of that. They also had similarities in that they thought outside of the conventional roles. These women were both self-portraiture artists and although they were considered that their interpretations did not always make their portraits self-portraits. Traditionally the artist was an outsider, but when it came to self-portraiture they became the subject and the audience became the outsider. The similarities and differences of Frida Kahlo and Cindy Sherman’s art were tied into the strength and also vulnerability they had because of their roles as women. They wanted the audience to see a background story to the portraits and not just an image of a beautiful face.
...eatly affect the mood of the paintings. The Women Picking Olives painting is quite simple but it has ominous details such as the highest women on the ladder is looking to her right, the trees and the leaves all going in different directions making it hard to tell where the breeze is going. These details make me believe that the painting is much more complicated then it seems and creates a sense of cryptic from the painting. The Harvesters looks complex but it’s clear that the painting is about a relaxed group of people getting ready for harvest time.
The Stranded Ship on East Hampton Beach by Thomas Moran and Abstraction by Marsden Hartley are both found in the Museum of Fine Arts of Houston. They are both extremely different such as visual elements, technique, and also different time periods. The culture and background of these painters influenced how their painting looks like which explains the difference of both paintings. Moran is known for landscapes and Hartley is known for abstract ideas which is a huge difference.
In the paint “Washington crossing the Delaware” by Emanuel Leutze and the poem Washington crossing the Delaware” by David Shulman are very similar but do have differences.
The painting done by Pablo Picasso, Les Demoiselles d 'Avignon (The Young Ladies of Avignon), and the painting done by Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Bathers at Moritzburg, may seem similar in many ways but are actually on opposite ends of the painting world of their time.
Although, both paintings are portraits, they vastly differ in their choice of subject; Marylin is a portrait of the iconic celebrity, while American Gothic portrays an ordinary farmer holding a pitchfork, as symbol of hard labour, posing with his daughter or young wife.
When looking at a piece of art a sense of wonder and beauty bewitches the beholder.
The historical painting I chose for my final, is an illustration of Bret Harte’s novel, Her Letter, His Response, and Her Last Letter, creatively illustrated by Arthur Ignatius Keller in 1905. The historical painting I chose for the comparison of Arthur Keller’s painting is another painting done by Arthur I Keller; illustrated for 54-40 or Fight by Emerson Hough, in 1909. Arthur I Keller is a very natural, elegant style painter, with an eye for natural beauty. Keller’s many paintings express intricate detail, and genuine quality. Although I picked two water color paintings out of Arthur Keller’s many collections of paintings, he also uses charcoal, acrylics, oils, and pastels to create other works of art. In both paintings I chose, Arthur Keller uses water color and gouache to paint people. Arthur’s first painting I mentioned, illustrating “Her Letter” is a more detailed painting. Keller uses water color to create a graceful look to his painting; his delicate balance of color, keeps the viewer’s eyes wandering around the painting. The focal point in the painting does not catch the viewer’s eyes because of heavy, dark colors, but because of the proportion differences of the people he implies. The painting gives off a very old fashioned feel, in a tasteful way. Arthur Keller’s second painting, illustrating “54-40 or Fight” has a completely different color theme, and gives off more of a mysterious, dark feel to it. The painting is detailed, but in a more simple way, and there is less negative space. As to where Keller’s “Her Letter” painting had a lot of open areas on the canvas, this painting, displays two people in a small enclosed dark room. The focal point is more dramatic, and a lot more obvious because instead of using sizing,...
In conclusion, the pieces have a variety of similarities as well as differences. Both pieces are double portraits that show the difference in time periods in which they were created and the way artistic tastes change over time. Both works of art seem to express differences between light and dark. Though both pieces have similar subject matters they vary in the use of medium and technique to create stark contrast with each other.
The first painting analyzed was North Country Idyll by Arthur Bowen Davis. The focal point was the white naked woman. The white was used to bring her out and focus on the four actual colored males surrounding her. The woman appears to be blowing a kiss. There is use of stumato along with atmospheric perspective. There is excellent use of color for the setting. It is almost a life like painting. This painting has smooth brush strokes. The sailing ship is the focal point because of the bright blue with extravagant large sails. The painting is a dry textured flat paint. The painting is evenly balanced. When I look at this painting, it reminds me of settlers coming to a new world that is be founded by its beauty. It seems as if they swam from the ship.
The two paintings have much more differences than meets the eye. Firstly, the periods during which the portraits are made are very distinct with a difference of an estimate of four centuries. Mona Lisa's portrait was made in the early 1500s while that of Adele Bloch-Bauer was painted in the early 1900s. Many transitions took place since the Renaissance period to the post-industrialization period. Possibly, this could be used to explain the clear-cut differences between the two. Secondly, the portrait of Mona is half-length her full body while that of Adele is full length. This depicts a varied art in use of space by the two artists. Thirdly, the two subjects display a discrete type of clothing. Mona is quite ordinary and simple despite the
Through the appearance that the paintings gave off of the thought out analyzations of the different aspects, the viewer is encourages to look at the different parts of the painting. This experience really made me think about what really needs to go into the paintings. It made me realize that sometimes like in some of the paintings the unfinished parts are really the most revealing. This is almost paralleled with us as human beings. It is almost always the unfinished or unrefined part of a person that creates that humanity that everyone looks for. It makes everyone feel comfortable because you are still on the same playing field. The same goes for art the unrefined parts reveal what it took to go from that part to some of the more finished parts of a painting. Through these different components of the paintings another can see what they need to do in order to get to where they may want to
The contrasts between depth and surface, figure and landscape, promiscuity and modesty, beauty and vulgarity all present themselves in de Kooning’s Woman and Bicycle. Although the figure is a seemingly normal woman out for an afternoon with her bike, she becomes so much more through the artist’s use of color, contrast, and composition. The exotic nature of woman presents itself in her direct stare and slick buxom breasts in spite of a nearly indiscernible figure. It is understood that, on the whole, de Kooning did not paint with a purpose in mind, but rather as an opportunity to create an experience, however, that does not go to say that there isn’t some meaning that can come of this work. Even Willem de Kooning once said that art is not everything that is in it, but what you can take out of it (Hess p.144).