Essay Comparing The Count Of Monte Cristo And Lord Of The Flies

1027 Words3 Pages

When put into a harsh situation evil will inevitably come out of everyone. Evil has many ways of developing but it will eventually develop. In The Count of Monte Cristo and Lord of the Flies there are multiple characters who turn evil because of harsh circumstances. As shown in The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas and Lord of the Flies by William Golding, evil will come out of everyone if put into a bad situation.
Evil has a direct link to oxytocin being released into the brain. (Zak 1) The 5% that don’t share many traits with psychopaths. (Zak 1) Not all evil people don't have the ability to release oxytocin. People who release oxytocin when given a positive signal tend to be “normal people. 95% of people release oxytocin when given a positive social signal. (Zak 1) Most people are not evil, the number may …show more content…

(Huff 1) Typically the one good relationship tends to outway the bad relationships if it’s strong enough. “Say a close bond with a grandmother--can offset negative influences in a dysfunctional household.” (Huff 1) That one good relationship could make up for all of the bad ones. In The Count of Monte Cristo Edmond Dantes has a good relationship with Abbe Faria which offsets all of the bad relationships that he has with people like Villefort and Danglars. He does eventually end up doing evil things throughout the book, although all of those evil things are in the name of revenge. In Lord of the Flies there are two examples of what a good relationship could do to a person. Piggy always talks about his “Auntie” which he seems to have a great relationship with. Piggy also never seems to turn truly evil even with all of the bad relationships that he has on the island. Jack on the other hand never seems to talk about someone that he has a great relationship with. Jack is also the one on the island that makes most of the other children become evil along with

Open Document