Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay against censorship
Argumentative essay on freedom of speech restrictions
Argumentative essay on freedom of speech restrictions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article, “The Truth about Lies and the First Amendment,” the author Ken Paulson writes to illustrate an important point regarding Xavier Alvarez, who was arrested and charged with a criminal offense for lying about being a recipient of the prestigious medal of honor award, and free speech: that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with its findings that the first amendment also protects Xavier Alvarez’s lies from legal, governmental prosecution.
In particular, the court has reasoned that free speech is at risk of censorship if it allows governments to become the overseers and regulators of truth. Which was why in one of the court’s many arguments, Judge Milan was adamant when stating that “‘the general freedom from government interference with
…show more content…
Sometimes the answer is obvious. You cannot lie to law enforcers when under legal detention and questioning. You also cannot lie in the court of law, as the author has pointed out: “You can’t lie under oath” (Paulson). Those are prosecutable lies under lawful situations.
At the same time, however, even though people have the tendency to be dishonest, not all lies are legally prosecutable. When asked to judge another person’s appearance, for example, some tend to lie in favor of that person, just to make the person feel better. When trying to avoid doing chores, some tend to lie about being too occupied with homework. Those are what I considered to be lies in the names of politeness and laziness; lies that cause no harm to others. Now, aside from lying in court, and aside from lying to avoid chores, a deceiver must, therefore, face legal prosecution if the lie can be undeniably interpreted as a verbal agreement; and is of such a detrimental natural, that it has inflicted either, or both, financial hardship or personal damage upon
1. Was Terminiello's right to free speech, which is protected under the Federal Constitution, violated, as applied in this case?
The free speech clause in the Bill of Rights states: “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech” (US Const., amend I). This clause, albeit consists of a mere ten words, holds much power and affluence in the American unique way of life. It guarantees Americans the right to speak freely without censorship by preventing the government from restricting the rights of the people to express their opinions. Consequently, this freedom can encourage citizens’ participation in politics; promote an adaptable and tolerant community; facilitate the discovery of truth; and ultimately create a stable nation. However, how much freedom should be granted to an individual? Where should the line be drawn for the coverage free speech protection? (1) What happens when the exercise of free speech puts other constitutional values in jeopardy? What values should prevail? (2) In an attempt to address these questions, many opposing interpretations have been presented. While some construe this clause in an absolute, categorical approach, others take on a more lenient, balancing stance. (1)
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
According to Anniken Davenport in the book Basic Criminal Law, perjury is “giving false testimony in a judicial administrative proceeding: lying under oath as to material fact swearing to the truth of anything one known or believes to be false (Davenport, 2018). A real-life example of perjury case was the case of a famous rapper by the name of Lil Kim. The case of Lil Kim was about a weapon offenses crime that has happened and Lil Kim gave a false testimony about that crime. Everything was going well until “her lawyer, Paul Shechtman, said Ms. Jones had lied out of a misguided sense of loyalty to men she considered her friends” ( Preston). When she admitted that it true that she has lies, she was “sentenced to serve a year and a day in federal
In the novel "Great Expectations" by Charles Dickens there are many examples of lying for what the perpetrator believes to be a good cause, and times where the perpetrator lies for their own personal gain. If you lie and have good intentions for your lie, than it should not be viewed as malicious or bad by anyone, but if you are lying with an intent to harm than you are not in the right and you can be viewed as wrong.
In my opinion, I think it is almost impossible for someone to get away with telling a lie. Yes, if you are
She lies to the bank so she doesn’t get charged with “$60 in overdraft fees”, out-and-out lie. She does not tell the truth to her husband about her day so he does not “[keel] over,” white lie. She lies to her clients so that she does not get fired for telling the truth about the reason she is late. She lies to her friends so that her friend’s feelings do not get hurt, (Ericsson 181).All of these are justifiable because of the intent. There are consequences to telling the truth in these cases and thus Ericsson needs to lie to avoid the
Lying is an issue that has been debated on for a long time. Some people believe that lying is sometimes ok in certain circumstances. Some people believe lying is always acceptable. In contrast, some believe lying is always bad. Keeping all other’s opinions in mind, I believe that lying is a deficient way of solving problems and is a bad thing. I claim that only certain situations allow the usage of lies and that otherwise, lying is bad. Dishonesty is bad because it makes it harder to serve justice, harms the liar individually, and messes up records. Furthermore, it should only be said to protect someone from grave danger.
Do you want to know why lying can be acceptable? It can be acceptable because of many reasons. Lying is sometimes acceptable when making others think positive about themselves, protecting people, or causing to harm others.
Most of us were taught from the time we are children that it is wrong to lie. Our parents, teachers and other adults told us that we should always tell the truth no matter what. That’s why my first reaction is that it is never acceptable to lie regardless of the situation. However, with a closer critical examination of the topic it is easy to see that it is not the best answer. Life is not always so black and white with right and wrong so easily defined. There are times when we might want or even feel we have to tell a lie, but does that make it acceptable? Who gets to say what makes a good reason for lying? These are the questions that make up the grey areas in life.
For example you can hurt someone's feelings. A significant reason is that you can hurt their feelings by saying the outfit they got looks nice on them but it doesn't.According to lies lies lies someone told a friend she liked her dress but she didn’t. You can also hurt someone by telling them you have plans but you really don’t.According to the article “It’s the truth Americans conflicted about lying.She didn’t feel like going out so she told her date something came up.
When is lying okay? According to the article, “Honestly, Tell the Truth,” by Barbara Billinger argues that lying is not okay and that you should tell the truth, no matter what situation you’re in. I agree with the author Barbara explains to us that we should always tell the truth and not lie in anyway, and to always be honest.
I agree with the statement "honesty is the best policy". People will be able to trust people who are honest, liars will have rumors spread around about them, and it's just plain easier to tell the truth. Nobody likes people who lie all the time and won't know whether to trust them or not. People get annoyed by people who lie a lot.
No one can go a day without lying. Lying has become such an integral part of society some people feel they should protect others from it. Some people are afraid of the truth and cannot own up to it. The only way to deal with it is to lie and hide it from them. Lying is done by politicians, businessmen, your parents and teachers. Everyone in society lies, but it is important. There are different types of lies and each is important for its own reason and protects society. There is White Lies, Groupthink, and Delusions. Each of these types of lies protect people.
According to Stanford there is no universally accepted definition of lying. The Oxford English Dictionary 1989 states that lying is “to make a false statement with the intention to deceive”. (Should state most accepted one??) In 1773 Isenberg defined lying as “A