Equality of the Sexes

3083 Words7 Pages

Equality of the Sexes

What is the real difference between men and women? Is sex merely an anatomical difference, or are gender roles based on actual mental and emotional differences? Regardless of whether gender roles are socially constructed or naturally inherent, they exist and have since Adam and Eve.

The history of gender roles has been long and varied, frequently switching from near equality of the sexes to complete inequality and back. In the Middle Ages, gender limitations were prevalent in that the woman was seen as weaker, inferior to the “perfect embryo”: the male. However, some equality was to be granted through the institution that most perpetuated cultural differentiation of the sexes: the Church. Gender relations began to shift with the Doctrine of Intent and the idea of courtly love. Women began to assume a higher status than before as unique and emotive beings. Emotion is also changed from being an inferior aspect of the female self to an idealized state achievable by both sexes. Abelard and Heloise are some of the first examples of this heightened emotion, and their love was celebrated rather than condemned—at least in future years. However, this emotion was in direct conflict with the Church, and along with many other factors the Doctrine of Intent helped bring about the Reformation. The Reformation brought great changes to the ideals of marriage and the church’s role in marriage, but it also carried negative effects for the female’s identity. As Ozment explains,

Whereas the centuries between 1300 and 1500 had been something of a golden age for women—their educational and vocational opportunities increased, and with them their civic freedom—the sixteenth century turned back the clock. Women were again squeezed out of the guilds and public places and increasingly confined to the home—a reversal of fortunes for which some scholars have held the patriarchal ideals of the Protestant reformers especially responsible. (Ozment 5)

The Reformation that intended to restore the status of women through the expansion of marriage seemed to suppress them back into their position as faithful, dependant and subservient wives.

Two books represent this progression, or regression, in the concept of the male and female self and their roles in society, ‘The Letters of Abelard and Heloise’ translated by Betty Radice and ‘The Burgermeiste...

... middle of paper ...

...n in ‘The Letters of Abelard and Heloise’, where women are weak and culpable due to their responsibility in the Fall, yet able to regain some status through virtue. Anna Büschler’s inferiority is more attributed to the relegation of women to the private realm through marriage, and her failure to attain this marriage. Heloise desired to avoid the institution of marriage, for marriage was devalued as a woman’s solution to her sexual urges, and for Heloise it was the institution that would bind Abelard falsely to her and eradicate his love. For Anna, marriage was the only road available to women at the time, and it would be her only solution to ostracism. Heloise manages to eventually overcome gender limitations through education and religious devotion—the rejection of marriage and love for public work. Anna finally gains some status by marrying, and in choosing her husbands she also maintains her role in the public realm of the court systems. The road to equality of the sexes has been a long and arduous journey—however, with pioneers such as Heloise and Anna fighting limitations and defined notions of female sovereignty, it is a road that the modern woman has no right to flee from.

Open Document