Enews is undoubtedly one of the most popular media platforms around the world. As an online discourse community their fan base is expanding now more than ever. According to Eonline, they are comprised of 38 million users. However, despite their immense platform, whether or not the reporting is done completely unbiased has been under speculation. Devoted community members will continue to stand with Eonline, but intolerant members who have to constantly question Eonline’s credibility will leave the community. Unbiased journalism will save this community from being neglected from their members. Eonline was derived from from a family of networks that provides members with the latest entertainment industry news. Eonline is the conception of E! …show more content…
For Eonline, journalists unify the community. Journalists are the heart of Eonline, without them there would not be headliners for their members. On the contrary, biased reporting has been a slight issue with Eonline. Eonline loves to give their members the latest news but it should not be expense of favored opinions. In particular, an Eonline member, Alex Wenger, is unhappy with some biased articles on certain celebrities. In his blog Wenger compares articles from Eonline and TMZ. He noticed that Eonline is especially biased with celebrity Kim Kardashian. In an article, TMZ wrote: “By the grace of God, the 32-year-old mom-to-be somehow managed to stay upright in a pair of sky high stiletto heels.:” as Eonline wrote: “Kim chose an outfit that minimized the belly growth, and praised her curves”. It is obvious that both websites are biased in their articles. Biased reporting will contribute to members looking elsewhere for their pop culture …show more content…
has had countless television shows with a range of celebrities. The E! Network is centralized on celebrities hence why there are many spin off television series. To maintain their connections, Eonline has became biased with certain celebrities. While other media outlets criticize certain celebrities, Eonline will come to their defense or justify their actions. Another member of the community has not been hesitant to express his perspective on biased articles that the E! Network has close ties with. Blogger, Derrick Turner, wrote : “Over the years I’ve noticed ‘E! News’ been very selective in their reporting when it comes to E! stars”. From a personal perspective, I have noticed articles posted on Eonline that minimizes scrutiny with celebrities they have close ties with. For instance, when media around the world scrutinized a relationship between a minor and a 25 year old musician, the E! network was in favor of the relationship. This made me look at the network in a different manner because they favored a relationship that an ordinary person would face jail time for. If the network can overlook the age of consent for celebrities, then they would go as far as overlooking more serious crimes. Maintaining relationships is significant but it should not be at the expense of overlooking morals. The E! Network needs a merge between morals and business so that it allows to remain unbiased.
The network can take precautions to prevent their community
As celebrities stand distinctively among the masses and cast out their halos of personality charm and strong suits of skilled abilities, the controversies about them are unavoidable shadows created from their fame. With the popularization of celebrity culture, information synchronization, and communication technology, their lives are publicly exposed and various forms of media (depending on eras) record their flaws. Tough information transmitted to audiences are frequently biased, evidences of objective reality remains, even in the remote past.
Celebrity blogs typically provide great insight into the three important theoretical perspectives in sociology. This paper will analyze the data obtained from five selected celebrity gossip blogs, such as Celebitchy, Yahoo Celebrity, The Huffington Post, Time, and SheKnows. The analysis will be based on the theoretical perspectives of celebrity gossip, particularly conflict theory. For instance, it will address the inequalities that exist in the gossip blogs based on race, gender, class, or sexual inequalities. Additionally, it will identify the interests of those served by the blogs as well as those who get exploited or suffer as a result of the publication of the blogs.
I will discuss what I learned from reading Brill’s Content article. Then, I will discuss my findings from visiting Media Research Center (MRC) and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) websites. I will share my opinion of about the Newsweek. Finally, I will share my thoughts about the role I think the media should play in a democracy.
During these difficult economic times sensationalism has become more prevalent in the media. Stories involving sex scandals and child murders have taken over our T.V and internet screens as well as the front pages of our newspapers. The media bias of sensationalism has been used as a sort of escapism for readers. Although it may seem that sensationalism has just started making waves, it has been around for decades. Sensationalism has been influencing viewers and contributing to media bias since the days of the penny press. Sensationalisms long history has been turbulent, self-serving, and influential to today’s reporting practices. With the influence over readers’ sensationalism’s media bias have and will continue to affect media reporting for years to come.
The social responsibility theory of the press ensures that a free press delivers the truth alongside with journalistic ethical posture to the readers. The press is responsible of its self-regulation. The Hutchins Commission amplifies that professionalism and responsibility to society are keys for a free press. Owners of the press and those who manage it are the ones responsible to decide if unregulated initiative is tolerable or not. The Rolling Stone magazine article about rape last December do not reflect the social responsibility theory. The article is not accurate and it violates the journalistic code of conduct to check sources. The Rolling Stone should not rely on an outsider for fact-checking as they reported. The people who work at the magazine, especially in high positions such as editor in chief should check the report. Failure in journalistic standards and confirmation bias are not acceptable in the social responsibility
Conclusion: A readers, watchers and listeners people are mesmerized by celebrities and the Holly Wood scene of the newest pop culture news. Unfortunately, this information they crave might not have the validity they expect. The fault behind releasing false stories into the public eye results in non-trusting spectators. In conclusion, the media manipulates celebrity stories for more interest from viewers. This in the end reveals that the tabloids believe the truth is not good enough for the controversial-seeking minds of people around the world.
This essay explores how crucial it is in the information age ensure sources are credible and reliable. To evaluate online resources, Miriam J. Metzger outlines in her article, Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research (2007) five criteria key in determining the credibility of resources. These are accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency and coverage. Metzger’s criteria will be further discussed in this essay in relation to news circulating the world wide web on major social networking platforms. This essay contends how it is the responsibility of the consumer to ensure the credibility and reliability of sources, by understanding how external factors such as algorithms
This paper will cover the omnipresence of media biases and their implications in three news stories from various newspapers including The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times and The New York Times through content-analysis and comparison. Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro in “Media Bias and Reputation”from the Journal of Political Economy argue that media biases, distort information to make it conform with consumers’ prior [political] beliefs in order to shape reports in whatever way will be most likely to improve the reputations of media outlets [thus increasing future profits by expanding the demand for their products] (Gentzkow & Shapiro, 2006, pg. 282). Additionally, in Four Information Biases That Matter W. Lance Bennett suggests that biases in the the news overwhelmingly plays to the human-interest angle and fragments the stories. The prevalence toward personalization and fragmentation biases engages readers through conformation to prior beliefs, such as using bias to affect readers’ political leanings and ultimately increases demand for their publication through likability and inquisition caused by unclear, fragmented stories.
The gossip industry has become popular in the last few decades. Our society enjoys knowing about the lives of celebrities. We obsess over celebrities on gossip websites, and even obsess to the extent of stalking these celebrities. This industry has impacted our culture immensely. It has tainted our culture in several ways from creating bad role models for our children to making stalking an everyday affair; either way, the media has changed our society greatly. The gossip industry has brought new entertainment for our pleasure, but it has come with negative consequences.
Have you seen the pictures of Madonna and her baby yet? Have you ever surfed the web and stumbled onto a site about celebrities? Probably so. There are thousands of sites on the web about celebrities; their official web sites, pictorials and biographical information. You can’t even go into a supermarket without being bombarded by tabloids.You can’t listen to the radio in the car. TV shows and whole networks rely on entertainment and celebrities in the news. VH1, MTV and E! are excellent examples of this. Many people make their living off celebrities and their personal lives. But why does this need to be explored? Producers and journalists say they are only making and reporting on what the people want. The general public say they only watch and read this “news” because it is so readily available. Lets face it, it would be easier to find matches for “Madonna and her baby “ on the web than it would be to find “biological engineering”.
An argument can be made that Journalism is one of the very few professions in the world of media that is handled with some sort of dignity and pride. After reading “The Elements of Journalism” by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, I realized how important journalism is to each and every one of us. Whether you’re a writer or a reader, the back and forth exchange between provider and consumer is extremely important in pushing society forward. Journalism after all is designed to challenge society, promote new ideas and spark conversation between one another. Despite the positives of journalism, there are issues that exist within the profession that cannot be excused and cannot be ignored.
Mainstream media such as television, radio, newspapers were the primary source of reliable information before the epoch of the internet. However, the situation has changed. The evolution of modern technology in the world today has led to the continuous increase in the methods of practicing journalism. Social and technological advancements have not only improved the pace and content of this field’s practice, but has extended its genre to online or cybernetic journalism. (Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2007). News websites most of which are owned by major media companies and alternative websites with user generated content such as social networking sites and blogs are gaining grounds in the journalism field of practice. (Nel, n.d). One of the chief forces affecting the practice of journalism nowadays is online citizen journalists. Nel (n.d) defines citizen journalism as “individuals playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analysing and disseminating news and information”. He further adds that “citizen journalism is slowly being looked upon as a form of rightful democratic ways of giving hones news, articles, etc, directly by citizens of the world from anywhere.” One of the major researches conducted in the field of citizen journalism, describes the phenomenon as “individuals who intend to publish information online, meant to benefit a community”, and this information is expected to benefit the audience or the wider population in making decisions for the improvement of their community. (Carpenter, 2010.)
"Journalism Ethics Online Journalism Ethics Gatekeeping." Journalism Ethics for the Global Citizen. Web. 05 Dec. 2010. .
In today’s society, human beings feel the need to read about other people’s lives in order to be entertained. Rather than taking interest in other activities like reading or the arts, people take interest in celebrity gossip. Society takes an interest in celebrity gossip because it is entertainment for them or it makes them feel better about themselves. Either way, people are reading more on celebrity gossip rather than picking up a good book and reading that instead. Celebrity gossip is not bad since, in a way, it is a form of news, but with gossip websites such as TMZ.com and Perezhilton.com, these websites have no boundaries as to what they put on their pages. Some stories may be interesting while others are just
Magazine. The context, audience, and purpose play a significant role in understanding the stylistic and structural elements of the article. OK! Magazine has conveyed to the reader the attitudes and values that are important to celebrities and to itself as an entertainment magazine. The text is extremely effective in shaping the perception of the reader and painting a public image for Ben and other celebrities. The article reinforces the values that are inherent in our modern society, as every person wants to gain recognition from other people and become a beloved celebrity who is remembered for their outstanding