Ebola Disparity In West Africa

995 Words2 Pages

Charitable Giving Natural disasters of great magnitude such a earthquakes, hurricanes, and tsunamis are usually followed by a quick response from the American population to donate money to help those affected no matter in which part of the world the disaster occurred. However, following an outbreak of a health disease such as Ebola there has been a markedly lower response rate to donations. Even though there seems to be a clear disparity in the amount of contribution the American population has made between these two classes of disasters, there are several contributing factors that could explain this. Among these contributing factors could be people’s trust for the organization, people’ emotional reactions towards the disaster and the level …show more content…

Although there are many well recognized organization, such as the American Red Cross, that fundraise to aid different causes, there also exist other organizations who may not be as trustworthy. People may think before donating not only on the trustworthiness of the organization, but also on the possibility that those funds may not ever reach their intended destination. Since the major outbreak of Ebola is in West Africa, people may question whether the intended funds ever reach their destination. However, it is important to note that this does not seem to be the major contributing factor to the disparity because in 2010 the American Red Cross raised 486 million dollars for the Haiti Earthquake, and in 2011 it raised 312 million dollars for the Japan earthquake and Tsunami. These numbers are substantially higher than what it has in raised in 2014 for the West Africa Ebola outbreak, 3.7 million dollars (Quartz). Despite the fact that all of these disasters have occurred in very distant places from the United States there has been much more aid for the natural disasters than for Ebola. Therefore, there seems to be other more powerful contributing factors to significant …show more content…

People are motivated to donate to a cause not only by the nature of the disaster, but also by the outcomes, and these outcomes are usually portrayed in the form of pictures and videos through the social media. It is likely that pictures and videos of destroyed, torn down building and people left without a shelter are more emotionally impacting to the human eye than photos of people in hazmat suits trying to protect themselves from the Ebola virus while taking care of the infected person. The emotional connection that people feel towards seeing others left without a secure shelter is most of the time more personally relevant because it is easier for people to be able to put themselves in the affected person’s shoes. It is easier for people to picture to think about the possibility that the natural disaster could have occurred where they live ringing up sympathy for the affected people, and therefore making them more willing to donate to provide relief. Whereas, it may be harder for someone to be able to place themselves in the shoes of a person infected with Ebola especially in a country like the United States in which fortunately the vast majority have access to clean water, food, and appropriate health care. Therefore, if people do not feel personally or emotionally connected to the cause they are less likely to make a contribution to help provide relief for those affected, such as in the

Open Document