Dual Personalities in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Stevenson

1310 Words3 Pages

Dual Personalities in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Stevenson

INTRO

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a classic mystery story, enticing to all audiences merely upon it’s suspense alone. When Stevenson first wrote the story (after recalling a dream he had) he had only the intentions of writing such an entertaining tale. Yet at the suggestion of his wife, he decided to revamp the mystery to comment on the dual nature of man and of society in general.

I believe that Stevenson is suggesting that "All human beings…are commingled out of good and evil.", as spoken by Dr Jekyll.

HYPOCRISY & THE GOOD MAN

Stevenson is suggesting that good and evil are inseparable in human nature. By discussing such themes as the hypocrisy of society, and the suppression of passion he proves that Stevenson proposes that we must feed our evil souls as well as the good.

Throughout the novel Stevenson portrays the central characters Utterson, Lanyon, Enfield and Jekyll as, to put it plainly boring. Each of these characters appears to be a fine, upstanding citizen, yet inside they harbour deep desires they consider as blasphemous as a short skirt on Sunday. Utterson enjoys wine, whilst the other characters allude to prostitutes, betting halls and public houses.

All of these "indulgences" are deemed unacceptable, forcing Victorian society to subdue their urges, and focus upon being "good." Most of the noblemen succeed at this strange game of deception, throughout the novel Utterson is referred to as good, a "good man" on countless occasions.

Dr Jekyll also develops a guise of a pure "good man". Yet, he finds it hard to subdue his evil side, and in an apparent bout of ‘physicians curiosity’ he decides to develop a potion which decides the self into good and evil.

Jekyll has realised and accepted his evil side although he as yet doesn’t desire to embrace it. Many of the other characters support this idea of inseparable good and evil, almost subconsciously it seems. For example the friendship between the "good" Utterson and the questionable Enfield seems to flourish rather than wither due to their complete opposites in personality. Lanyon, another "good" man, is also described as "somewhat theatrical", hardly a compliment in the uptight Victorian era in which the story is set.

HYDE

I believe the most telling proof that good and evil is linked within ...

... middle of paper ...

...te is encountered throughout the novel ­ does Jekyll have control of Hyde or is it something that is merely out of his control. The latter seems more true. I believe that Stevenson is comparing Jekyll’s dependence on Hyde to an the addiction of drugs for substance abusers. While those victims repeatedly say, "I could stop whenever I want," in reality, like Dr. Jekyll, they are not in control.

The singular enlightening moment is when Dr Jekyll realises himself that Hyde is part of him., "And yet when I looked upon that ugly idol in the glass, I was concious of no repugnance, rather, a leap of welcome. This, too, was myself." Although he fights Hyde consistently throughout the novel, this one moment of weakness, when jekyll Affirmates that Hyde, his evil side, is indeed appreciated proves conclusively that Dr jekyll and mr Hyde shows good and evil as linked in human nature.

Works Cited

Charyn, Jerome. "Who Is Hyde?" Afterword: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Bantam Books. Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., 1981. 105-114.

Stevenson, Robert Louis. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Bantam Books. Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., 1981.

Open Document