Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Double indemnity analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Double indemnity analysis
1 There are two sides to every story. The characters in Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity attempt to hide their true feelings to avoid dangerous consequences. Phyllis, for instance, comes across as innocent and somewhat languorous but as the plot unfolds, the viewer sees the cunning and ruthlessness inside of her with a touch of weakness. Through the choices these characters make and the actions they perform, their inner emotions are revealed, whether or not they want them to be seen.
Before we even learn the doomed tale of Walter or even physically meet him, we can get an idea that there is some sort of guilt involved from the opening sequence alone. We are taken to downtown Los Angeles and notice the erratic driving of a car from a long shot.
…show more content…
As Phyllis tells her sob story to Neff on his sofa, the light from the lamp is on one side of her face while a shadow takes on the other side. This “two-face” effect hints that she is not to be trusted. Seeing Lola dressed in white and Phyllis in black as they play backgammon further establishes their roles as the innocent “good girl” and the deceitful “femme fatale”, respectively. The frame in which Neff and Phyllis are watching Mr Dietrichson signing his so-called “car insurance” also provides examples of exposed trickery. The closed form of the shot tells the true motive just in that one frame: the positions of the three creates a physical love triangle, and the back-to-camera of Neff raises suspicions as to what he’ll plan next as Mr Dietrichson is truly signing his death …show more content…
Under the persona of the abused and unhappy housewife, she manages to have Walter wrapped around her finger with no difficulty until the end. The snappy dialogue from her serves as bait for Neff’s attention as shown in the “There’s a speed limit in this state” bit. After she lets Neff in on her plot, we see him pacing back and forth in the dark of his apartment replaying it in his mind. He is debating his moral conflict until Phyllis comes in to “return his hat” and he turns the lights on; this is representing him giving in to the alluring woman. Meeting Neff at the grocery store to discuss the plan to kill her husband, Phyllis pretends to be nervous and afraid to carry out in order to confirm that Neff will fully commit to the murder. Driving her husband to the train station (and his inevitable death), a close-up and dominant contrast are put on her emotionless face as she has Mr Dietrichson believe that she will actually miss him when he leaves. Even when Walter has her figured out, Phyllis believes she has one more trick up her sleeve when she shoots him once but no more than that to try to convince him that she is remorseful.
Double Indemnity is one of the most perfect examples of film noir, in that the main characters commit the worst deeds that they could possibly do. However, that is not to say that there has been no underlying sentiment of guilt, vulnerability, treachery, and manipulation in the atmosphere. One may even argue
From those three points such as Dunstan changing his life to devote to Mary Dempster, Boy’s situation with Leola, and Paul’s persona change we see how guilt affects these characters in totally different ways. Even though Boy was the one who threw the snowball, Dunstan was the one to feel guilt about it, yet Boy wipes out this guilt. Even though Paul Dempster felt guilty for his mother he decided to deal with it by being a whole other person to handle it. Therefore, guilt is the intended study throughout the entire novel.
destructive, exotic and a self-determined independent who is cold hearted, immortal and less of a human. The females portrayed in the noir were primarily of two types - either projected as ethical, loyal loving woman or as ‘femme fatales’ who were duplicitous, deceptive, manipulative and desperate yet gorgeous women. In
The characters inhabit their private realities in order to detach themselves from a world that confuses and alienates them. Laura, Amanda, Tom, and Jim prefer to immerse themselves in their narrow view of time rather than embrace the flow of time. Laura remains isolated as she has failed to find love. Amanda judges Laura as she imposes her own narrow expectations on her. Tom believes that he can escape reality and become inseparable from the imaginary worlds of movies. Jim's idealistic view of Laura suggests that he is out of touch with reality. The play demonstrates that the characters desire to escape reality due to their inability to live in the present and embrace the flow of
Tennessee Williams allows the main characters in the plays, A Streetcar Named Desire and The Glass Menagerie, to live miserable lives, which they first try to deny and later try to change. The downfall and denial of the Southern gentlewoman is a common theme in both plays. The characters, Blanche DuBois from A Streetcar Named Desire and Amanda from The Glass Menagerie are prime examples. Blanche and Amanda have had, and continue to have, many struggles in their lives. The problem is that Williams never lets the two women work through these problems and move on. The two ladies are allowed to destroy themselves and Williams invites the audience to watch them in the process (Stine 474).
Two classical themes in literature are concealed guilt and confessed guilt and in many instances the reader sees the affects of these on individuals. In the examination and exploration of The Scarlet Letter and Macbeth the necessary comparison for both is provided. The guilt in The Scarlet Letter is seen in the minds and outward appearance of each main character, Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale. In Macbeth the readers sees an obvious guilt in the main character, Macbeth.
Walter brings to topic his importance to the scenario, and decides to break away from the event and think of his answer towards his wife’s information and response. He later is shown the understanding of his wife by the reaction of his mother, who questions his standing on how his father would have reacted. This brings Walter to think of why he should change and not walk out on times of importance. Walter discovers that his turmoil of drinking and appearance on the topic could end up losing the life of his newly developing child. At the discussion over selling the house owned by the family to Mr. Linder, Walter is shown the original faith that the selfish purpose of the money for himself would be better the property that would benefit the entire family, including his child.
In Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window, L.B. Jeffries, played by Jimmy Stewart, becomes completely obsessed with spending all of his waking hours watching his neighbors from his wheelchair. He even uses a camera to better his view and thus enhances his role as both a spectator and a voyeur. This contributes to the creation of a movie being played right outside Jeffries’ window. In this “movie within the movie” his neighbors’ lives become the subject for the plot. Each window represents a different film screen, each which is focused upon only when Jeffries directs his attention to it. He witnesses both the anxieties associated with the beginning of a marriage and the heartache of relationships ending. The plots that are played out before his eyes become more important than his own personal life. In fact, Jeffries renounces the idea of marriage due to the scenes he witnesses from within his apartment. This is displayed by his initial rejection of the beautiful Lisa Freemont, played by Grace Kelly. She is unable to divert Jeffries’ attention from the window even with the most forward flirtations. It is not until she puts herself on the other side and into the “movie” that he becomes interested in her. Lisa finally becomes the subject of the gaze and only then does Jeffries show any sexual attraction towards her. When Lisa breaks into Thorwald’s apartment, Jeffries does not see the same Lisa he saw when she stood by him and sat in his lap. He now looks upon a “guilty intruder exposed by a dangerous man threatening her with punishment” (Mulvey 207). He is aroused by this new spontaneous side of her. From this scene we see that Lisa Freemont cannot become a part of the movie until she becomes a character in the “movie within the movie.” This creates a new perception of Lisa for Jeffries and clears away many of his marriage anxieties, providing closure to their dispute and foreshadowing a relationship and eventually a marriage between the two.
... invent these fictitious alter egos so they are able to escape the restraints of propriety. However, different members of the society have different viewpoints of what is decent and what is not. A paradox within the play is the impossibility of being earnest and moral within the society. The characters who embrace triviality and wickedness are the ones who may have the greatest chance of attaining virtue.
The genre film noir has some classical elements that make these films easily identifiable. These elements are displayed in the prototypical film noir, Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity. These elements include being filmed in black and white, a morally ambiguous protagonist, and a prominent darkness. However, the most striking part of a film noir is the femme fatale, a woman who craves independence through sexual and economic liberation. In his film, Chinatown, Roman Polanski uses many of the classic elements of a film noir, however he twists many of them to reflect the time period. This is particularly evident in his depiction of his “femme fatale,” Evelyn Mulwray.
The noir style is showcased in Sunset Boulevard with its use of visually dark and uncomfortable settings and camera work, as well as its use of the traditional film noir characters. In addition, the overall tone and themes expressed in it tightly correspond to what many film noirs addressed. What made this film unique was its harsh criticism of the film industry itself, which some of Wilder’s peers saw as biting the hand that fed him. There is frequent commentary on the superficial state of Hollywood and its indifference to suffering, which is still a topic avoided by many in the film business today. However, Sunset Blvd. set a precedent for future film noirs, and is an inspiration for those who do not quite believe what they are being shown by Hollywood.
Her tense mind is then further pushed towards insanity by her husband, John. As one of the few characters in the story, John plays a pivotal role in the regression of the narrator’s mind. Again, the narrator uses the wallpaper to convey her emotions. Just as the shapes in the wallpaper become clearer to the narrator, in her mind, she is having the epiphany that John is in control of her.
Authors often make use of rhetorical strategies for additional effects, appeals to the reader, relating to an audience, or even for simply drawing attention to a specific section/part of a work. Nonetheless, these Rhetorical Strategies can prove crucial in the unraveling of such a work. The preceding is the case for a work entitled Something Wicked This Way Comes, by Ray Bradbury. Within the context of the story, a circus enters a small town and changes its overall atmosphere with never before seen mystical evils. Only two boys, Will Halloway and Jim Nightshade, stand in their way. These uncanny occurrences bring out the morality and malevolence of several characters in the story. In Bradbury’s work, there are many discrepancies in the moralities of each character relative to the development of the plot and their overall portrayal in the novel. Bradbury adds many instances in which certain characters have to make a choice between what they wish to do and what they should do. Such decisions accurately portray the conflict as an internal discontinuity between the ultimatums of good and evil. Thus, making the readers question his or her interpretation of each and challenge the societal parameters that encompass them.
Despite that Cain writes Phyllis in a way to build a mysterious and creepy mood around her, for instance when she tells Huff “Maybe I’m crazy. But there’s something in me that loves Death. I think of myself as Death, sometimes” (Cain 18), the overall tension of the plot was not much affected. As a matter of fact, Wilder removed some scenes and in exchange, created some of his own to the plot. There are two crucial element that contributed to tension and the mood of suspense. First, the criminal history of Phyllis that are present in the book were removed. The fact that these records were omitted makes Phyllis colder and a better femme fatale. For instance, the femme fatale character was portrayed so well by Barbara Stanwyck that Phyllis seemed to be an experienced criminal rather than a first-timer. Consequently, it adds creepiness to Phyllis and to the overall plot. Furthermore, Wilder added a scene where Keyes visits Neff unexpectedly while he is waiting for Phyllis. Tension was brought to the plot since the audience knows that Neff works with Phyllis while Keyes is not aware of it. Acknowledging that Keyes is determined to find who committed the crime, that scene must have made every spectator sit on the edge of their seat. On top of that, not only the omission and the addition of scenes about Phyllis contributed to making the
Walter Younger plays both the protagonist and antagonist. Walter dreams of being like the rich people he drives around, becoming wealthy, providing for his family the rich people do. He seems to feel that he didn’t have much in his family, besides the family itself and he wants to give his family what he never had. Economic hardship make walter feel enslaved and also the economic hardship has deferred his dream. His character evolves throughout the play and with it does the pride and loyalty of the family. Walter is unsure of his position as the man in charge of the household at first. In the beginning most of his actions hurt the family, however his sudden rise to his position “made him sort of a hero in the last scene.� This “heroism� is what showed the families pride in order to complete a dream. “He speaks of his father’s hard work and the dignified way in which he conducted his life. Then, drawing Travis to him, Walter rejec...
This episode illustrates a major conflict throughout the story. As Walter dreams bigger and bigger he seems to leave the 'smaller' things such as his family behind. This movement away from the family is against the furtherance of the values and morals of the family. While his father would have been happy simply working and caring for his family, Walter is more concerned with becoming a 'mover and shaker' without thinking about the resulting consequences for his family.