Divine Command Theory Case Study

1100 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical dilemma case analysis paper

1) What is the “divine command theory” and how does it act as an ethical framework for beliefs and decisions? How does Quinn defend the divine command theory of religious ethics?

The divine command theory is when someone plays out God’s will or God’s command. They believe that because God commands it then it is morally right. This could mean doing something good or doing something bad, if it is God’s will then it is right (Boss, pg. 150).

Quinn argues that very few people have been given brutal or harsh commands from God, so it is safe to say that we do not need to live in fear that there will be a huge slaughter, or something on those lines (Boss, pg.154).

2) Summarize the four criticisms of divine command theory, giving …show more content…

How come he always naturally disasters (Boss, pg.157).
So far right now, I believe I take a stand with the critiques of this theory, not because I am not religion but because there is no way of knowing whether a crime was committed due to God’s command or not. Whether it was or not I do not believe it to be excusable.

3) What is “natural law” theory? What was Aquinas’ view of natural law theory in “The Summa Theologica”? How is “natural law” a form of ethics and is used for ethical decision-making? In particular, what is the relationship of natural law to civil disobedience? (You will need to look at Chapter 9, in order to answer this and the following questions.)

Natural law theory is the idea that morals are given to us by God. Morality does not come from God’s command; we are naturally aware of morality. We are able to determine whether an act even a command from God is morally right (Boss, pg.159.) Aquinas believed that “moral law is embedded in moral reason” (Boss, …show more content…

Whether you support the Iraqi and Afghanistan wars or not, give a criticism of the just war theory that would justify those wars (hint: might use some of the criticisms of the natural law theory on approximately p. 107)!

Not all people have the same morals, or agree on what is right or wrong. So when discussing the just war theory not everyone is going to agree what should be morally right to go forward with war (Boss, pg.163).

5) How do H.D. Thoreau, MLK, Jr., and S.B. Anthony all justify the ethics of civil disobedience?

H.D Thoreau, MLK Jr and S.B. Anthony justify civil disobedience by saying that “when breaking an unjust human law, we must do so in a way that is consistent with moral law” (Boss, pg.169). They also followed these criteria:

Only moral and nonviolent means are used to achieve its goals.
An effort is first made to bring about a change through legal means.
The actions are open and public.
Dissidents are willing to accept the consequences of their actions (Boss, pg.169).

6) What roles does religion play in society for the classical theorists, Durkheim and Marx, and for the contemporary theorist,

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of God Behaving Badly By David Lamb

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the first chapter of God Behaving Badly, David Lamb argues that God is unfairly given a bad reputation. He claims these negative perceptions are fueled by pop culture and lead many to believe the lie that the God of the Old Testament is angry, sexist, racist, violent, legalistic, rigid, and distant. These negative perceptions, in turn, affect our faith. Ultimately, Lamb seeks to demonstrate that historical context disproves the presumptuous aforementioned. In addition, he defends his position by citing patterns of descriptions that characterize God throughout the Old Testament. “Our image of God will directly affect how we either pursue or avoid God. If we believe that the God of the Old Testament is really harsh, unfair and cruel, we won’t want anything to do with him” (Lamb 22). Clearly, they way Christians choose to see God will shape their relationship with Him.

    Read More

  • Walter Wink Beyond Just War And Pacifism Summary

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    The problem is that these few criteria for a just war aren’t easy to apply. According to Wink the criteria themselves is not the problem “but the fact that they have been subordinated to the myth of redemptive violence” (Wink 290). Making the just war theory a way to try and justify wars that are unjustifiable. Leading him to believe we should instead change the just war criteria to violence-reduction criteria, since that is what we are all after in the long run. He believes this will be a good medium for both advocates of nonviolence and the just

    Read More

  • Debunking Bin Laden's Just War Theory Claims

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    September 11th, 2001. An organization denoted as terrorists by the United States, Al-Qaeda, attacked the U.S on our own soil. In his “Letter to the American People”, the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, takes a defensive stance regarding the attack, giving his justifications of why the attack on the U.S was warranted and acceptable in the terms of Just War Theory, citing examples of the Right to Self-Defense and reasons why he was justified in targeting American civilians. Just War Theory is comprised of ideas of values to determine when acts of aggression are morally justified or not, and it is primarily split into two categories, Jus Ad Bellum (Justice of War) and Jus In Bello (Justice in War) (Walzer 21). In this essay, I will be arguing against Bin Laden’s claims of the justification of Al-Qaeda’s attack, using the failure of Bin Laden’s attack to meet the requirements for a just war in terms of Jus Ad Bellum and Jus In Bello.

    Read More

  • The Just War Theory

    1705 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.” As depicted in the quote by Ernest Hemingway war is a difficult situation in which the traditional boundaries of moral ethics are tested. History is filled with unjust wars and for centuries war was not though in terms of morality. Saint Augustine, however, offered a theory detailing when war is morally permissible. The theory offers moral justifications for war as expressed in jus ad bellum (conditions for going to war) and in jus in bello (conditions within warfare).The theory places restrictions on the causes of war as well as the actions permitted throughout. Within early Christianity, the theory was used to validate crusades as morally permissible avoiding conflict with religious views. Based on the qualifications of the Just War Theory few wars have been deemed as morally acceptable, but none have notably met all the requirements. Throughout the paper I will apply Just War Theory in terms of World War II as well as other wars that depict the ideals presented by Saint Augustine.

    Read More

  • Just War Theory Essay

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality is hard to define, and nearly impossible to agree upon; however, when it comes to war, there is a single “widely accepted moral theory” that reaches beyond borders . Just war theory, a doctrine originally attributed to the Christian theologian Saint Augustine , postulates that certain circumstances can lead to the justification of war, particularly if war is used to prevent even greater atrocities from occurring in the future. In its fundamental charter, the United Nations even articulates that every state has the right to go to war in its charter. In its broadest definition, just war theory declares that war may be justifiable if the states involved have both jus ad bellum, or just cause, and jus in bello, or just conduct in war;

    Read More

  • The Just War Theory

    2620 Words  | 6 Pages

    Justice in warfare has become an influential perspective. In particular the moral implication highlights the core importance of the ‘Just War’ theory. The principle was first established in ancient Rome 106-43 BC by Roman Philosopher Cicero, he stated that, ‘no war is considered just, unless it is preceded by an official demand for satisfaction or warning, and a formal declaration has been made’, (Cicero, 1913, p.38-39). Therefore, it is precedent that a war is established under the principle of justice. The theory was further coined by Roman Christian Philosopher, Augustine of Hippo (345-430 BC) and later carried on by Aquinas (1274 BC). The principle was used to pursue the question on when it was permissible to wage a war and the conduct of a war. Both Christian and Greek philosophers had conflicts on when and how to fight in a war. Therefore, the moral objective for both philosophers was to establish peace. During this period, Aquinas became one of the most influential philosophers on the just war principle. He argues that for a war to be just, it has to fulfil three criteria, ‘(1),the war had to be conducted not privately but under authority of a prince, (2) there had to be a just cause for the war, (3) it was necessary to have the right intention to promote good and avoid evil’, (Dinstein, 2005, p.64). Aquinas emphasises that the principle of jus ad bellum focuses on the moral justification for war. Whereas, the moral conduct of war is implemented through the principle of jus in Bello. Therefore, it can evaluated that the just war theory implements a set of rules to justify military warfare.

    Read More

  • Preventive Vs. Preemptive War: An Analysis

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Just war theory is a doctrine that has been studied by all sorts of leaders, religions, and especially military leaders. Basically it is a doctrine that consists of all sorts of military ethics of war and broken down into two parts, Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Just ad bellum is consisted of 5 parts, the first part is legitimate authority and what that means is that the people who are making the decision of war are recognized officials and understand the strategies of war. The second reason is for a just cause, having the right reasons for going to war and understanding that violent aggression is not the plan. The third is that the last resort is going to war, and being able to understand that before a country starts a war that can be solved in less violent ways. The fourth option is prospect of success, yes winning the war is a success but how many lives can be lost and still count that as a success. The final option is the political proportionality and that is when the wrong of war is proportionally less then the wars cons. I believe that if all non violent options of Just ad bellum have been tried and were given a fair shot and the only viable option is to go to war then going to war is acceptable. But if all non violent option shave not been exhausted and war is nothing but a quick decision this can be considered wrong and

    Read More

  • Argument Regarding The Divine Command Theory

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    Broadly, the divine command theory is a religious moral code in which God’s commands determine what human beings should or should not do. As such, it is expected for theists to subscribe to the divine command theory of morality. The deontological interpretation of the divine command theory separates actions into one of the following categories: mandatory for human beings to perform, prohibited for human beings to perform, or optional for human beings to perform. Those actions that are mandatory to perform are ones which have been expressly commanded by God. Failing to commit a mandatory action would be defying God’s commands, and thus, according to the divine command theory of morality, immoral. Actions that are prohibited are ones that God expressly commands human beings do not perform. Consequently, to perform a prohibited action would be immoral. Finally, those actions that God does not expressly command that human beings should perform or should avoid performing are optional; there are no moral implications to performing or not performing such acts. The rightness or wrongness of an action is inherently and wholly dependent upon th...

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience And Letter From Birmingham Jail By Martin Luther King Jr.

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    Justice is often misconceived as injustice, and thus some essential matters that require more legal attentions than the others are neglected; ergo, some individuals aim to change that. The principles of civil disobedience, which are advocated in both “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. to the society, is present up to this time in the U.S. for that purpose.

    Read More

  • The Importance of the Just War Theory of Saint Augustine

    539 Words  | 2 Pages

    Just War Theory is the belief the war is morally or legally justified. There are four most important tenets, also known as belief, principle, or creed, from the Just War Theory of Saint Augustine.

    Read More

  • divine laws versus government

    1567 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to philosophers, there are four types of law that guide morality and behavior for humans. Eternal, divine, natural and civil laws all contribute to the quality of life for mankind, but these laws often get confused with each other. This paper will examine two instances of a clash between the civil laws of government and divine laws of religious conviction.

    Read More

  • The Divine Command Theory

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    Divine command ethics is a theory that states, that an action's moral content is equivalent to if it was commanded by God. It states that if God is all powerful, then he must also be all good. It then follows that if God is all good, everything He commands must be moral. It uses God as the only basis of determining if a particular action is moral. Moreover it states that an action cannot be moral if, God did not expressly command the action to be performed, this theory also does not allow an atheist to be able to perform a moral action even by mistake. Since the morality of the action depends entirely on if God would have commande...

    Read More

  • Morality and God

    1376 Words  | 3 Pages

    Let's take this line of reasoning to its logical conclusion. If the Divine Command Theory were true, then the ...

    Read More

  • Exposition and Critique of Divine Command Theory

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    This essay will explain and critique divine command theory. First, divine command theory will be defined. Second, two key arguments for divine command theory will be described. Third, criticisms will be raised against cultural relativism. Last, a final assessment of divine command theory will be given.

    Read More

  • The Natural Law by Thomas Aquinas

    1682 Words  | 4 Pages

    of right and wrong buried within him. This sense guides people, culture, and even whole countries to act in certain ways. Thomas Aquinas called this innate sense the natural law. The natural law is established by God in order to make men more virtuous. When examined closely it is found that the natural law contains the precept of all law and, is at odds with certain laws that exist today, specifically abortion.

    Read More

More about Divine Command Theory Case Study

Open Document