Dissociative Identity Disorder: Multiple Personality Di

1256 Words3 Pages

Dissociative identity disorder (DID), formally and popularly known as multiple personality disorder was surrounded by controversy in its inception and still faces the doubts of many critics today. DID involves the presences of two or more personalities or alters in one individual. Its inclusion in the DSM-V formalized its realness and significance, paving the way for clinicians to assess, diagnose and offer treatment. The current paper aims to present an analytical overview of the methods for diagnosing and assessing the disorder, to examine the current treatment therapies and evaluate the availability of treatment resources within the local community.
Diagnosis
Despite the controversy surrounding its etiology DID was integrated into the DSM-IV. …show more content…

Presents 4 pathways to the formation of DID: childhood abuse pathway, childhood neglect pathway, factitious pathway and iatrogenic pathway. Childhood abuse pathway patients have undergone severe abuse often in the form of physical or sexual abuse, but those patients who faced neglect “described mothers who were [psychologically ill] and emotionally unavailable. Ross explained neglect in the form caging in small places. The factitious [sic] pathway as he describes presents no dissociative symptoms before initial therapy despite some history of abuse and neglect. He furthers that such patients fake aspects of DID and are often self-injurious. Ross suggests that such individuals are predominately antisocial. The last pathway he defined is iatrogenic which occurs as a result of poor therapy techniques, he further suggests that patients in this category tend to present a dependent …show more content…

In a study with a sample of 20 psychiatry patients who have either been diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder or dissociative disorder not otherwise specified (DDNOS). The DID patients scored an average of 11 while those with DDNOS only scored 2.2 (Ross, 1997). The items of the scale have been integrated into the MMPI-2 which includes questions such as, “I often feel as if things are not real” and “My memory seems to be alright” (Ross, 1997). This integration is a positive one because prior to the Phillips Dissociation scale, the issue of differentiating DID from borderline personality disorder was highly problematic; furthermore there was no scoring system for the diagnosis of DID. The issue would have been evident if the MMPI were used to assess Halime, she likely would have received an erroneous diagnosis because of the ambiguity of her presentation. Such misdiagnosis would have resulted in potentially harmful treatment – treatment that may have worsened her symptoms (Levy & Swanson,

Open Document