Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Education attainment and social class
Affirmative action impact on society
Standardized testing in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Education attainment and social class
Scholars suggest that standardized testing, tracking, teacher expectations, and the differential distribution on knowledge contribute substantially to the (re)production of social inequalities. Social inequalities consists of advantages/disadvantages associated with groups based on factors such as race and social economic status (SES; class). In the case for education, the advantages/disadvantages can greatly impact the resources that an individual has available to them. These educational advantages can include: access to better schools, preparation for standardized testing, and quality of teachers. This paper will used the books The Truly Disadvantaged by William Julius Wilson and Blacks in the White Elite: Will the Progress Continue? By Richard …show more content…
This book acknowledges the inequalities in the education system between low income (mainly minority) students and the “elite students” (children from upper class corporate America and educated professionals). As seen in Student Social Class and Teacher Expectations: The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Ghetto Education (Rist, 2000) the quality of education varies greatly due to the teacher expectations of the students. These expectations are typically better the higher the SES background of the student (Rist, 2000). Therefore, teachers expect that the higher SES students will achieve more, are smarter, and work harder, than low SES students on average. Students also have very different perspectives of knowledge based on the quality of teaching and resources in the school that they receive (Rist, …show more content…
Many of the original legislations laws that changed to protect minorities, inherently gave advantage to higher class minorities. Middle class minorities had more social capital, in which they could use systems like Affirmative Action and scholarships for disadvantage groups to their benefit (Wilson, 1987). While the truly disadvantaged were stuck in a perpetuating cycle of poverty, where they either stayed in the same low positions or have gotten lower. As these upper class minorities increased their positions they were more likely to leave disadvantaged urban locations, which leads to less resources in the community. In particular many individuals see this loss of resources and can develop a sense of unworthiness of these resources and/or that there is nothing they can do to change this. This is detrimental to a community as one of the best was to end the cycle of poverty is to seek education that allows you to obtain better jobs, and bring wealth into the
Woodson (2010) presents a cogent argument for considering race as the central construct of understanding inequality in America. Woodson’s most notable publication, “The Mis-Education of the Negro,” identifies the school’s role in structuring inequality
Everyone has fallen victim to a form of prejudice regardless of whether they're considered as a minority in their society. Around the world, minorities are viewed as forlorn and impotent by the upper-class who look down on them. As of 2014, about 37.9% of the United States population is deemed as a minority. However, the jobs people refer to as high paying and provide financial stability are principally being dominated by the majority groups in the United States. For example, data from the U.S census shows that 8 out of 10 lawyers are white. Why are minorities confronted with such injustice when they have the potential to become as capable as everyone else? One reason is the psychological influence an individual impresses upon themselves. Most minorities accept that exceeding the
Hallinan, Maureen T.. "Sociological Perspectives on Black-White Inequalities in American Schooling." Handbook of the sociology of education. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000. 50-70. Print.
The essay “Still Separate, Still Unequal”, by Jonathan Kozol, discusses the reality of inner-city public school systems, and the isolation and segregation of inequality that students are subjected to; as a result, to receive an education. Throughout the essay, Kozol proves evidence of the inequality that African American and Hispanic children face in the current school systems.
The theme of the research is to discover why there is such a vast educational gap between minority and Caucasian students. Many American are unaware that such an educational gap actually exists among today’s students. This article informs us of alarming statics, such as of African American students representing a majority of the special education population, despite only making up roughly 40% of the student population. It also breaks down key events that contributed to the poor education that minority children are currently receiving. For example, in the past, it was illegal to educate African Americans and when it became legal to blacks were treated as second class students. They were segregated from their white counter parts and given hand-me-down textbooks. This article also discusses others factors that contributed to the poor education of minority students such as moral principles, socio-political, and economic stat. Despite the amount of time that has past, today’s schools are similar to the past. Minority children are still in second-rate learning environments while white students enjoy the comforts of first class school buildings and textbooks. In summary, the theme of this article was to bring attention to the educational gap among African-American, Latino, Asian, and other non-white students.
What is learned in school, be it public or private, determines, for the most part, what position an individual will find themselves in - in the future. In “White Privilege and Male Privilege,” Peggy McIntosh, an author known for doing something that is rarely done in the white community--speaking of her race--makes references to education, to her privileged education, to support her argument on white and male privilege. Sometimes I wonder what society would look like without education; would there be any norms, or rules? Education is so deeply instituted into most Americans' lives that those questions will probably never be answered. One thing is certain; some people are able to get a better education than others.
So why would one have the connection with minorities and poverty? Could there possibly be some sort of relation between race and class? This all started with our Federal Housing Agency or the FHA. In the book The Possessive Investment in Whiteness the author George Lipsitz put extensive research into how the FHA started and how its agency ties into minorities receiving loans or the lack of. In 1934 the FHA was provided from the government who then gave the agency’s power to private home lenders, and this is when racial biasness came into place through selective home loans. Lipsitz says “[the] Federal Housing Agency’s confidential surveys and appraiser’s manuals channeled almost all of the loan money toward whites and away from communities of color”(5). These surveys were conducted by the private lenders who had free reign to prove the loans to whomever they want. Because the minorities did not get a chance to receive the FHA loans that they needed, they are then forced to live in urban areas instead of suburban neighborhoods. There was this underground suburban segregation going on with these private lenders, which would then greatly diminish better opportunities for minorities to live in better neighborhoods.
A minority student is generally classified as belonging to a lower-income family than the average white American, who is classified by earning a higher income. A student belonging to a low-income family will not have the same opportunities as a student from a high-income background. A student from a high-income family will be able to afford more study aids and supplies. A student from a low-income family, generally a minority, does not have access to these resources. Because they frequently cannot afford the same materials as their white counterparts, they generally do not perform as strongly on standardized tests. Wealthy families are generally very well educated. They have greater knowledge of how to guide their children in the right direction for academic success. Some can afford a private school with better teachers and a more comfortable learning environment. Paying for college is easier, and academics often take greater priority in these well-to-do households. Usually, poorer families have a harder time paying for college and supporting their children. Schools in low-income areas tend to lack funding for good teachers and supplies because of their financial situation. More often than not, the main goal of these families is to have their children get through high school so that they can begin ea...
After watching the Teach Us All documentary on Netflix, it opened my eyes to many of the issues regarding educational inequality. The study looked at schools in Little Rock, New York City, and Los Angeles to show us the current state of U.S. education and how far we have come since the school desegregation crisis. The thesis of this documentary is that since the efforts of the Little Rock Nine, our belief is that educational inequality has improved when in reality, it hasn’t improved and the actions of our country have had negative effects. Teach Us All emphasizes the need for unity and collective action to improve our education system for the kids in poor communities that are in the most need. Our country has devoted all the resources to the middle and upper class for education and are taking money away from where it needs to
In this day and age, it is almost impossible to be a middle or upper class citizen without a college degree, so without the ability to finish high school or have enough educational merit to get a college scholarship, these kids will always be in the lower class. Fixing this issue would prepare the United States for a future with more black people in the middle and upper class. A solution to this problem is to have more government funding to high schools in poor neighborhoods. This can provide better school supplies, more qualified teachers, and improved school facilities. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, A twenty percent increase in per-student spending a year for impoverished children can lead to an additional year of completed education, twenty five percent higher earnings, and a twenty-percentage point reduction in the chances of poverty in adulthood (Samuels, Alana). Overall, a change like this, a more complete education, can greatly impact the future a student’s life and the lives of an entire population of
Michael Oher was from an all-black neighborhood located in the third poorest zip code in the country. By the time he was a sophomore, he’d been to 11 different schools, he couldn’t read or write, and he had a GPA of 0.6. In his first-grade year alone, he missed 41 days of school and ended up repeating both the first and the second grade; he didn’t even go to the third grade. Oher was one of the thousands of children that have been identified as having four or more of the at-risk factors mentioned by the National Center of Education and Statistics (NCES). According to the NCES, poverty and race are high on the list of things that negatively affect students’ ability to succeed at school. Other risk factors include changing schools multiple times and being held back from one or more grades. Oher’s biography, The Blind Side by Michael Lewis, proves how socioeconomic status impacts a child’s academic success because placed in perspective, education is not as important as the hardships of reality.
In affluent school districts which in most if not all cases are predominantly white students have “the best teachers, most up-to-date textbooks and computers, and superior academic facilities.” School districts made up of mostly wealthy and white students have the money to pay for superior resources and staff. However, struggling schools in equally struggling school districts do not have the money to pay for better resources and staff to improve the education of economically disadvantaged and racial minority students. Students inside of these economically disadvantaged school districts are left at a large disadvantage when it comes to competing for a higher education with wealthy white students with a high quality education. These disadvantaged students are left to fend for themselves without the support system and quality resources that are afforded to wealthy white students when looking for future opportunities such as applying for college. African Americans and other minorities restricted from buying homes and building equity has kept them in a state where they have little to no chance to improve their condition. Even if the people in low-income neighborhoods are very talented and have a large amount of potential they have no way to exercise and build on that potential because they don’t have an opportunity to attain an
Education inequality has been present throughout the years, discriminating between the minority student and its Caucasian counterpart. Education is an important factor to become successful now days. Although children of all backgrounds are provided access to education, the American education system still has a gap between the rich and poor. Students of the high class are granted with liberal education, where they can share their thoughts, opinions, and ask questions because the teachers encourage them to do so. But the lower class (minorities) are getting education in a mechanical method (banking)-where the teachers share their thoughts and opinions but do not encourage the student to participate. In the article “500 nation” When the student
Let us say that the rich, on average, made 1 million dollars on average, and that the average middle class worker made $40,000. These both seem like reasonable, livable wages, although one is significantly higher than the other. Now imagine that middle class workers continued to make $40,000, while the income of the rich began to climb to reaches of five, 50, or even 500 million dollars. Now some may argue that there is nothing wrong with this situation. The middle class are still living, and the rich doing even better than they were doing before. Isn’t is selfish to not want anyone to do better because a portion of society will not benefit?
In an education journal, Anyon (“Social”) provides the reader with the concept that there are four different types of schools, working class schools, middle-class schools, affluent professional schools, and executive elite schools, after observing five schools. The working class schools are made up of parents with blue-collar jobs, with less than a third of the fathers being skilled, and the majority of them being semiskilled or unskilled. “Approximately 15 percent of the fathers were unemployed… approximately 15 percent of the families in each school are at or below the federal ‘poverty’ level…the incomes of the majority of the families…are typical of 38.6 percent of the families in the United States” (Anyon, “Social”). In a more recent study conducted by Anyon (“What”, 69), she states that,