Diggs V. Nova Scoti Habeas Corpus Case Spenser Jackson

Diggs v. Nova Scotia: Habeas Corpus Case Spenser Jackson (A00448181) CRIM 3505-2 Jamie Livingston April 4, 2024

Introduction: The habeas corpus case being discussed focuses on Mr. Diggs’ imprisonment at the Central Nova Scotia Correctional Facility (CNSCF) and his challenge to the lawfulness of his confinement. Mr. Diggs claims that between September 13 and November 3, 2023, he endured constant lockdowns and had limited access to time outside his cell, depriving him of his residual liberty. This form of material deprivation is characterized by confinement, such as solitary confinement, having none of the essential legal difficulties established by the Correctional Services Act, which is at the centre of Mr Diggs’

19). Vogelman (1968) stresses the importance of access to legal recourse for prisoners, noting, “In connection with the prisoner’s right to mail his petition to the proper officials, it has also been held that prison officials may not punish inmates for mailing false statements of deprivation until there has been a court adjudication of the allegations on the merits” (p. 393), underscoring the significance of procedural fairness even within penitentiary settings. These perspectives provide different perspectives on the complexities of material deprivation, emphasizing the importance of protecting individual rights within the criminal justice system. Analysis of material deprivation in the Diggs v Nova Scotia case: The Diggs v Nova Scotia case provides a thorough study of the concept of material deprivation of residual liberty in the setting of habeas corpus proceedings. Many key concepts appear, offering insight into the causes and consequences of material deprivation in the prison system. First, the case underlines the need for habeas corpus as a safeguard against unjustified imprisonment, particularly in prison. Emphasizing the critical role in upholding basic rights in prison

C., Lima de Arajo, J., Borges de Vasconcelos, R., & Cosme do Nascimento, E. G. (2015). Health Profile of Freedom-Deprived Men in the Prison System, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v33n2a09 Richardson, G. (1984). Time to Take Prisoners’ Rights Seriously! Journal of Law and Society, 11(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409929 Runciman, R., & Baker, G. (2017). Delaying justice is denying justice: An urgent need to address lengthy court delays in Canada. Senate. Canada. Schwartz, Barry (1972). The Species of the World. Deprivation of privacy as a functional prerequisite: the case of the prison. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 63(2), 229-239. Section 10(c) – Habeas corpus. Government of Canada. 2023, June 29. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art10c.html#::text=Everyone%20has%20the%20right%20on,the%20detention%20is%20not%20lawful. Tushnet, Mark. A. (2011). The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Progressive constitutionalism: what is it? Ohio State Law Journal, 72(6), 1073-1082. Vogelman, R. P. (1968). The Species of the World. Prison Restrictions. Prisoner Rights. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 59(3), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/1141762 Pinheiro, M. C., Lima de Arajo, J., Borges de Vasconcelos, R., & Cosme do Nascimento, E. G. (2015). Health Profile of Freedom-Deprived Men in the Prison System, 33(2).