Divergent Development: New England and Chesapeake Region in 17th Century

699 Words2 Pages

During the 17th century, many different economic, geographic, and social factors shaped the Chesapeake region and New England. The difference in development between New England and the Chesapeake region occurred because they were founded for different purposes, they had very different climates, and they had very different economic gaps. The first reason why the difference in development between New England and the Chesapeake region occurred was because they were founded for different purposes. The primary reason for the settlement of New England was to create a safe haven for the Puritans of England where they could freely express their religion. The Puritans believed that it was their responsibility and God’s expectation that they create moral, Christian communities. John Winthrop reflects this in document A when he says that their failure would “open the mouths of enemies to speak evil of…God.” The Chesapeake settlers …show more content…

The hot climate of the Chesapeake region was appealing to large landholders. It was profitable, especially along the rivers, because mass production of rice and tobacco was possible. The colder climate of New England, however, made the production of crops more difficult, requiring the New England industry to diversify and include smaller farms, fishing for cod, and ship building. The climate in New England also made the spread of disease more difficult, increasing life expectancy, more so for men, in the region. The Chesapeake climate allowed the rapid spread of disease; life spans were shorter, making it even more difficult for families to grow. The abundance of large plantations and crops due to the Chesapeake climate made outside help from slaves and servants was much more necessary and profitable than in New England because of New England’s colder climate, limiting their farming

Open Document