Deontological Theory Essay

966 Words2 Pages

Age of Enlightenment is a key period in awareness of the importance of human, new inventions and outllok on life. That time gave us great people, such as Johann Sebastian Bach, Franciss Bacon, Denis Diderot, Voltaire, and Immanuel Kant. The last one became the ancestor of the German Classical Philosophy, had great impact on understanding the concepts of ethics invented Deontological Theory, which explains the reasons of actions and new system of evaluations of actions. Kantian deontological theory continues to generate interest in contemporary debates on ethical theory and, most importantly, the basic structure is a big argument in biomedical ethics .In those paper I will explain the principles of Deontological Theory, main aspects of it and how it differ from Consequensialism and Aristotle`s Theory of Virtue.
Deontological ethics, which derived from Greek word “deon”, which mean “duty”, faces charges in order to determine what is ethical. This theory answers the questions “What should I do?” special indication of my duties or moral obligations.
In terms of deotnological theory, actions are right or wrong due to a certain type of act (eg, murder, torture), and not because of their consequences. There are a lot of deontological theories, and majority of them taking into account the consequences; but for any of these principles and justification of actions is not only appeal to consequences. Primacy over the good correctness in deontological theort is its central feature. For modern deontological theories is is very general to take the form of rights theory,accroding to which each person has a centain moral rights(such as life, liberty, minimum standarts of well-being) that can not be taken into accound utilitarian apperls to the ...

... middle of paper ...

...nation of circumstances, directly contributing to happiness.
Kant believes it is realistic very common sort of contradiction when some condition and quality of a happy man is not aligned with the moral bases. Initially, only when Kant introduces the concept of good faith, it remains quite uncertain. Good will is something without which unacceptable actually quite essential for a man of quality - mind, wit, judgment, courage, determination, dedication: " ... they can also be extremely bad and harmful if not goodwill.. . " . Goodwill - something without which - satisfied happy man does not call our location. " Needless to say, - says firmly Kant - that reasonable impartial observer can never give pleasure even kind of permanent prosperity of man, which adorns one tittle clean and good will, so that goodwill is, apparently, a precondition even deserve to be happy. "

Open Document