Democracy On Democracy

886 Words2 Pages

Democracy is a form of government, which literally means the “rule of the people”. Democracies fundamental questions include democracy include: How and why will the citizens govern, what are the criteria for citizenship, who will make majority decisions, who will the decided on divided issues what will be the perimeters to establish to govern a territory and how will chaos be handled if the citizens want a different representative form of government? Democracies
One of the most influential Greek philosophers was Aristotle. Aristotle classified many things, including government in terms of telos; a purpose, an end, and the way things are supposed to be. The telos of the government was to provide its citizens a good living life and happiness.
Aristotle defines democracy as the rule of the poor and the rule of the majority. A government can be governed in two ways according to Aristotle; by virtuous or non-virtuous leaders or by its economic class. In order for a governmental system to be considered successful it needs to achieve its telos. In democracy the majority of the rule and the rule or poor does not assist the city-state in achieving telos. Hence, Aristotle believes democracy is not a good form of rule. According to Aristotle, democracy cannot be virtuous form of government because; of the way freedom is defined. “Democracies do not define freedom properly, everyone lives the way they want and toward what goals they want to attain” (Aristotle, p. 104). In order for a government to be considered virtuous its need to rule for the common good of its people. The government has to achieve its telos; the good for its citizens. By allowing the citizens to dictate the way of rule they are creating a government which is non-virtuou...

... middle of paper ...

...olved in decision-making. A subsequent limitation was that the criteria needed for a successful democratic government are unrealistic. The citizens of the city-state No city-state was going to be able to live off of those standards. Rousseau view of democracy is justified in this quote “; A true democracy has never existed, and never will exist.”(Rousseau, p.359). Rousseau did not believe that popular sovereignty necessarily entitled democracy as a form of government. Due to democracy being unstable there was a chance for civil disobedience to take place in the city-state. Democracy was more suitable for small city-states, without any corruption and when the general will of the people was put above private interests. However Rousseau in Book 3, Chapter 15 states that a democratic government has the ability to be viable if they are joined together in confederations.

Open Document