Definition Of ESP

1330 Words3 Pages

Hatchinson and Waters (1987) asserted that “ESP should properly be seen not as any particular language product but as an approach to language teaching which is directed by specific and apparent reasons for learning” (p. 19). In addition, “it is an approach to language learning which is based on learner need. The foundation of all ESP is a simple question: Why does this leaner need to learn a foreign language?” (Hatchinson & Waters, 1987, p. 19).
Strevens (as cited in Dudley Evans & St. John, 1998) differentiates between four absolute characteristics and two variable characteristics of ESP. Strevens state that the absolute characteristics are designed to meet specified needs of the learner; are elated in content (that is, in its theme and topics) to particular discipline, occupations and activities; centered on language appropriate to those activities in syntax, lexis ,discourse, semantics and so on, and analysis of the discourse; contrasts with general English. The variable characteristics, on the other hand, may be restricted as to the learning skills to be learned (for example reading only); may not be taught according to any preordained methodology (Strevens, 1988).
The division of ESP into absolute and variable characteristics is very helpful in resolving arguments about what is and what is not ESP. This definition of ESP implies that it can be but is not necessarily concerned with a specific discipline, nor does it have to be aimed at a certain age group or ability range (Anthony, 1999). In this regard, Hutchinson and Waters (1987:19) assert that “ESP is an approach to language teaching in which all decisions about content and method are based on the learner's reason for learning" (p. 19).
Dudley Evans and St. John (1998) e...

... middle of paper ...

...ordan, 1997). Swales (1988) notes that this approach is based on lexicostatistics. Dudley Evans and St. John (1998) assert that:
Most materials produced under the banner of Register Analysis followed similar patterns, beginning each chapter with a long specialist reading passage, usually related to a specific discipline, seems to have been standard practice in EAP, probably arising from situations where general English materials where supplemented by subject-specific reading passages. (p.22)
Dudley Evans and St. John argue that although the main rational behind register analysis was to make ESP courses more and more relevant to learner’s need, this trend was not successful in this respect. Finally, the problems, lacks, and difficulties with register analysis resulted in the appearance of another trend in ESP, namely Discourse Analysis (Dudley Evans and St. John

Open Document