Walter Mignolo’s work pursues the idea to decolonize knowledge, meaning to resist and rethink western cultures tendency to monopolize the “conversation” and to impose itself as the model for all other cultures to emulate. Pre-colonialized indigenous cultures and Columbus’s encounters helps contribute to the decolonization of knowledge.
Walter Mignolo’s strategy seeks the involvement of denaturalizing ideas and areas of knowledge within coloniality. Coloniality means the idea of Latin America, the birth of the West and the foundation of the modern world and uses a colonial strategy for decolonization purposes. Decoloniality is the decolonization of knowledge. Coloniality has a specific, theoretic and historic meaning. Coloniality is the other side of modernity and it constitutes modernity and makes modernity possible. Meaning without coloniality, there would be no modernity. Mignolo rationalizes that colonial differences show more modern or recent thoughts of modernity and the representation of knowledge that operate on the modern/colonial world system. He does this to show the interdependence of coloniality and modernity. This decolonial scholar claims that modernity contains the colonization about the amount of time or the amount of space, and is not exactly a European phenomenon, it is rather seen as rhetorical. Also, the decolonial theory is a theory that arises from the development of decolonization of knowledge, which is then lead to the conception of economy and politics. All of this is basically summed up in two sentences from in his piece from “The Idea of Latin America.” He states, “To excavate coloniality, then, one must always include and analyze the project of modernity, although the reverse is not true, because colo...
... middle of paper ...
...he Spanish Conquest of those living in the Latin American area before Columbus. Egocentrism is shown throughout this piece and society values the Gods and religion and hierarchies are shown.
Walter Mignolo’s piece, “The Idea of Latin America,” clearly states that it is near impossible to escape coloniality upon entering the certainty or belief that you have to catch up with modernity. Having certainty or belief that you have to catch up with modernity was very efficient when it can to the fiction of imaginary of the Europeans. To my understanding, this is something that continues to be struggled with.
Works Cited
Mignolo, Walter. "Preface: Uncoupling the Name and the Reference." Preface. The Idea of Latin
America. Blackwell Publishing., 2005. x-xx.
Tedlock, Dennis. Popol Vuh: The Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life. New York: Simon &
Schuster, 1996. 63-74.
Specifically, Veracini defines colonialism as a form of “exogenous domination” which is foundationally built upon the extraction of labor in
Words can be on a much grander scale. The Popol Vuh is a story originating from modern day Guatemala with its oldest excerpt dating back to the early 18th century. The most recent translation is by Allen J. Christenson in 2007. The Popol Vuh follows the Hero Twins Hunahpu and Xbalanque and their epic tales. The mythological story ripe with symbolism is often coined as the “sacred book” of the Maya people. Symbolism in the Popol Vuh is important because it explains life and death, satirizes human behavior, represents the creation of the Maya, and it depicts the importance of maize.
But then that brings into the argument that a “vast majority of those of us who write about colonial period are either or criollo origin or mestizos totally integrated into the occidentalized society that predominates in most Latin American republics,”(2). León-Portilla is a Mexican who is most likely to have a criollo origin, and considering from what Verdesio stated earlier, that there might be a slight twist of the real accounts since it comes from a history that has already been integrated in an altered manner. Verdesio states that this factor is crucial to determining the accurate historical representation of the indigenous, “Our perspective, then (even in the case of the best intentioned among us), is still a European one—a perspective
Two conflicts during this time are seen as significant towards this battle between the interests of the Natives in the Americas. One of which was between two men: Bartolomé Las Casas and Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda. Las Casas defends t...
The first real country to colonize the Americas, aside from the Norse colony Vinland that traded with the Native Americans (Goldfield, 15), were the Spanish. The Spaniards primary goal in colonization of this world was the idea of “Reconquista”, or the conversion of heathens, namely the natives, to Christianity. They believed they had “religious justification for conquest” (Goldfield,
Galeano, Eduardo. Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent. Translated by Cedric Belfrage. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1997.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
In the first section, Monroy describes the Indian and the Iberian cultures and illustrates the role each played during missionization, as the Indians adapted ?to the demands of Iberian imperialism.?(5) He stresses the differen...
During the European expedition in America, they founded colonies in North America that attracted thousands of settlers. The Europeans tried to get rid of the Native Americans in order to get what they wanted, which was economic wealth, landowning, slave trade, property ownership, and tobacco. M. Zylstra writes about “Colonization of History”, hybridization of history, and what the colonization of the natives by the Europeans lead to. Zylstra states.
The 1800's were a renowned era in European history. With the rise of imperialism came the ruthless desire to seek new land through the use of authoritative implications. Whether it be the discovery of the Americas, where Christopher Columbus discovered various islands, which were clustered with indigenous people that were eventually completely wiped out for the pure desire of Spaniard power. This craving to "assimilate" indigenous people and to convert them to Christianity was an element, which rooted 19th century Europe. Although the actual question to whether these actions were good or evil are up for debate. Imperialism has been viewed as an expansion that serves only ones "object" and that it has no purpose beyond the benefit of the "self". This paper will explain Imperialism through a sociological perspective, while blending in notions of capitalism and modern day Imperialism that may now be viewed as Globalism.
The foundation for new imperialism rested on the ideas and products of the enlightenment. Advancements in technology, medicine and cartography led to the success of new imperialism (Genova, 2/15). For example, European voyages would have been for naught, if it were not for the enlightenment discover...
According to Trevor M. A. Farrell, author of perspective, “Decolonization in the English-Speaking Caribbean”, colonialism is when organization of resources of a country being exploited is done for the financial benefit of the oppressor. All the power lies in the hands of the colonizing country (589). The tourism indust...
European colonialism was the period between 16th and mid-20th century. The triangle trade had emerged in the 16th century and slaves, sugar, furs, and cotton, enforced through military interventions, drew together the people, politics, economics, and even diseases of Europe, Africa, and the Americans in a triangle of previously unimaginable, highly unequal, and long-lasting relationships of exchange. Even today, we can find traces of many of these connections in the global economy for example, the French military operating in Côte d’Ivoire. So, the European colonialism played a pivotal role in establishing the framework for today’s global economic system.
The thesis of this article is that Western culture in itself is a unique and diverse culture, but it is not nor will it ever be the culture of the rest of the world. Two theories are introduced, the Coca-colonization theory and the modernization theory.
...ed Okonkwo, “[The white man] says that our customs are bad. But how can he understand our customs when he does not even speak our tongue?” This powerful line from the book Things Fall Apart, captures the very essence of the negatives of colonialism. The Europeans did not see the cultures that once flourished or the ancient traditions embedded in the local tribes. They did not see the sense of community and belongingness that their victims once shared. Instead of taking their differences as unique, the Europeans saw them as a threat to their economic progress. They took so much away from the civilizations that will never be regained, simply for their own imperialistic, monetary purposes. European nations may have reached an all time high in terms of economic prosperity, but it was not and will never be worth the loss of humanity and morality necessary to achieve it.