“Boom-down, and you were dead, never partly dead” (23). In The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, soldiers cope with death in multitudes of ways. While none of the coping mechanisms described in the book can truly be characterized as “healthy,” some can definitely be perceived as less destructive behaviours to the soldiers coping with their loss or losses, as well as to the other members of the platoon surrounding them, in both a physical and emotional manner. As implied by Tim O’Brien, one of the most utilized methods, internalization, in comparison to violence, is considered to be, for the soldiers, the most harmful way of handling death.
While there exist an infinite amount of coping mechanisms, telling stories, while technically displayed
…show more content…
Rat Kiley, for instance, lashes out after losing Curt Lemon. Tim explains that Rat’s actions were not meant to kill, but rather to hurt (75). He describes Rat’s gruesome actions, explaining how he “put the rifle muzzle up against the mouth [of the baby water buffalo] and shot the mouth away” (75). Yet, throughout this, “[t]he whole platoon stood there watching, [as they knew] [...] Curt Lemon was dead. Rat Kiley had lost his best friend in the world” (75). Unable to comprehend the death, Rat turns to violence, perhaps taking out all of his anger and sorrow onto an animal he knows will not fight back, as a way to retaliate. Unlike storytelling, violence implies that someone -- or in this instance something -- will be harmed. Although Rat’s “an eye for an eye” logic is understandable, as he was clearly distraught, from the way Tim O’Brien explains both the situation and the events that transpired, it is clear that the violent behaviour was not entirely justified. Yet, Rat is not the only soldier that lashes out. Lieutenant Jimmy Cross, along with the remaining soldiers in the company, find violence to be a necessary step in their coping. After Ted Lavender died and the helicopter carried his body away, the Alpha company traveled to the village of Than Khe. Upon their arrival the men “burned everything. They shot chickens and dogs, they trashed the village …show more content…
Mary Anne Bell, a civilian and one of the soldier’s girlfriend, for example, struggles with coping after witnessing, first hand, the horrors of the war. For her, Vietnam had the effect of a “powerful drug,” and, as a result, she “wanted more, she wanted to penetrate deeper into the mystery of herself, and after a time the wanting became needing, which turned into craving” (). As a civilian, Mary Anne Bell was not used to seeing cadavers, blood, or even as much violence. Consequently, when placed in a war zone, isolated from family and friends, she had to adapt. Although she transformed into a soldier-like figure, and was therefore better suited for these distressing situations, it appears as though everything simply became too overwhelming, resulting in her delving into the “mystery of herself” (). Seeking comfort, she internalized the situation and isolated herself, unable to come to terms with the deaths surrounding her. Although Mary Anne could be considered an inaccurate representation of a soldier coping with loss as she was brought to Vietnam to visit her boyfriend, Tim O’Brien, in “The Man I Killed,” clearly reflects how deeply soldiers are affected by loss, essentially demonstrating what internalization can be like. After killing a young Vietnamese man walking on a trail, Tim shuts down, unable to deal with the flood of emotions taking over him. Later,
middle of paper ... ... After I was disposed of, the corporal then made the majority of the 27 sufferers march with the rest of the troops. Most of the men, including an Australian chaplain, died during succeeding weeks, largely as a result of this calculated brutality.’ (Iggulden, 2009, p.22)
In the short story, “Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong,” by Tim O’Brien, the author shows that no matter what the circumstances were, the people that were exposed to the Vietnam War were affected greatly. A very young girl named Mary Anne Bell was brought by a boyfriend to the war in Vietnam. When she arrived she was a bubbly young girl, and after a few weeks, she was transformed into a hard, mean killer.
“We did not break down, but adapted ourselves” These soldiers know that modern warfare is extremely complicated and demands knowledge and experience. They learn how the differentiate shell sounds, when to take cover, when it’s safe to take off your gas mask, how to tell shrapnel from high explosives. It is shown through the naive and inexperienced recruits that not knowing and applying this knowledge is fatal. Some soldiers call on their innermost animal instincts to allow them to kill mercilessly on the field, using the assistance of a metaphor Remarque writes “We are dead men with no feelings, who are able by some trick to keep on running and keep on killing.” Granted war is a barbaric affair, ironically sometimes the worst of conditions can bring out the best in people. This is through the form of comrade and mate ship. On the field fellow soldiers would provide mutual support for each other and create extremely tight bonds. This is shown in All Quiet on the Western Front through Paul and his tight nit platoon. Paul’s unique experience with mate ship is how especially close he is with his friend Kat. This is expressed in the recounting of when they stole and cooked a goose together. Remarque writes “We don't talk much, but I believe we have a more complete communion with one another than even lovers have.” This shows how mate ship was
War is often thought about as something that hardens a soldier. It makes a person stronger emotionally because they are taught not show it and deal with it internally. People say that death in war is easier to handle because it is for the right reasons and a person can distance themselves from the pain of losing someone. However, there is always a point when the pain becomes too real and it is hard to maintain that distance. In doing so, the story disputes the idea that witnessing a traumatic event causes a numbing or blockage of feelings. Rat Kiley’s progression of sentiment began with an initial concern for the buffalo, transforming into an irate killing of the animal, and then ending with an ultimate acceptance of death. These outward displays of feeling suggested that witnessing the death of a close friend caused him to become emotionally involved in the war.
The violent nature that the soldiers acquired during their tour in Vietnam is one of O'Brien's predominant themes in his novel. By consciously selecting very descriptive details that reveal the drastic change in manner within the men, O'Brien creates within the reader an understanding of the effects of war on its participants. One of the soldiers, "Norman Bowler, otherwise a very gentle person, carried a Thumb. . .The Thumb was dark brown, rubbery to touch. . . It had been cut from a VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen"(O'Brien 13). Bowler had been a very good-natured person in civilian life, yet war makes him into a very hard-mannered, emotionally devoid soldier, carrying about a severed finger as a trophy, proud of his kill. The transformation shown through Bowler is an excellent indicator of the psychological and emotional change that most of the soldiers undergo. To bring an innocent young man from sensitive to apathetic, from caring to hateful, requires a great force; the war provides this force. However, frequently are the changes more drastic. A soldier named "Ted Lavender adopted an orphaned puppy. . .Azar strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device"(O'Brien 39). Azar has become demented; to kill a puppy that someone else has adopted is horrible. However, the infliction of violence has become the norm of behavior for these men; the fleeting moment of compassion shown by one man is instantly erased by another, setting order back within the group. O'Brien here shows a hint of sensitivity among the men to set up a startling contrast between the past and the present for these men. The effect produced on the reader by this contrast is one of horror; therefore fulfilling O'Brien's purpose, to convince the reader of war's severely negative effects.
... now. In the final chapter, the platoon searched through a burned down village and some of them came across some corpses. “Rat Kiley bent over the corpse. “Gimme five,” he said,” (page 149). Kiley gave the corpse a high five!?! The soldiers are no longer normal people. Their attitude toward death is literally considered insane. The characters react to death in a multitude of ways in the novel. O’Brien showed the impact war has on our minds with an extreme subject such as death.
One of the hardest events that a soldier had to go through during the war was when one of their friends was killed. Despite their heartbreak they could not openly display their emotions. They could not cry because soldiers do not cry. Such an emotional display like crying would be sign of weakness and they didn’t want to be weak, so they created an outlet. “They were actors. When someone died, it wasn’t quite dying because in a curious way it seemed scripted”(19). Of course things were scripted especially when Ted Lavender died. It had happened unexpectedly and if they didn’t have something planned to do while they were coping they would all have broken down especially Lieutenant Cross. Cross...
He figured out that his personality had changed and realized that he now felt more mean. War changes people, with some changes being very dramatic and very quick. This is evident in the behavior of Norman Bowker, Bob “Rat” Kiley, and Tim O’Brien. These changes affected each person differently, but they all had dramatic changes to their personalities. These changes have very severe effects on each person.
There you stand over the body of a fallen friend, a brother or sister in arms. You are asking yourself why them, why not you? What could have I done to save them? That is when you wake up, sweating, panting. It was just a night terror, yet it feels the same as the day they died, even though it has been ten years. This is just one of the many emotional scars soldiers of war face. Though why do we go to war when this is the cost? For many it is because they are unaware of the psychological cost of war, they are only aware of the monetary cost. Tim O 'Brien addresses the true cost of war in The Things They Carried. O 'Brien suggests that psychological trauma caused by war impedes daily life in young Americans drafted into the Vietnam war. He does
It is common for those experiencing grief to deny the death altogether. Many people do this by avoiding situations and places that remind them of the deceased (Leming & Dickinson, 2016). However, by simply avoiding the topic of death and pain, the mourner only achieves temporary relief while in turn creating more permanent lasting agony (Rich, 2005). In this stage, mourners will begin to feel the full weight of the circumstance. Whether the death of a loved one was sudden or long-term, survivors will feel a full range of emotions, such as sadness, guilt, anger, frustration, hopelessness, or grief. While many of these emotions can cause serious suffering, it is important for the survivor to feel whatever emotions come up and deal with those feelings, rather than trying to suppress any
Being forced into a war he has no interest in, Tim O’brien recounts his time fighting in the vietnam war. Many of the soldiers there carried things deep to their hearts. Others carried fear, guilt, and despair of what they had done and what was to come. These physical things were a way these soldiers could cope with their feelings and try and stay sane during these times. “Lieutenant Jimmy Cross carried letters from a girl named Martha, a junior at Mount Sebastian College in New Jersey.”(1) These letters were coping mechanisms for Jimmy and he read them when he needed comforting or just to read them to help him forget.
In the Vignette the “Man I Killed” Tim O’Brien relates himself to the man he killed. He makes up a life for the man who he didn’t even know. “But all he could do, he thought, was wait and pray and try not to grow up too fast.” This quote shows an assumption about the man that Tim O’Brien makes based off close to nothing. This analysis could also relate to Tim’s experience with the war too. O’Brien was hesitant to go to war in the beginning for that exact reason he assumed the Vietnamese man was. O’Brien related to the man and through this realized that the soldiers fighting each other weren’t very different aft...
In the novel, The Things They Carried, the chapter The Man I Killed tells the story of a main character Tim who killed a Viet Cong solider during the Vietnam War. The author Tim O’Brien, describes himself as feeling instantaneously remorseful and dealing with a sense of guilt. O’Brien continues to use various techniques, such as point of view, repetition, and setting, to delineate the abundant amount of guilt and remorse Tim is feeling.
In the book The Things They Carried, has a lot to deal with the Vietnam war. If you are talking about the war you will most likely talk about death and how tragic death can be. Death could make you feel sad, make you want to honor a fallen friend, and it could scare you. This book gives you all the elements of everyone of those parts that I just described and more. The importance of death in this book cuts deep, it tells a different story for each kid that lost their lives fight for a war that's not really theirs to begin with.
Usually when someone is murdered, people expect the murderer to feel culpable. This though, is not the case in war. When in war, a soldier is taught that the enemy deserves to die, for no other reason than that they are the nation’s enemy. When Tim O’Brien kills a man during the Vietnam War, he is shocked that the man is not the buff, wicked, and terrifying enemy he was expecting. This realization overwhelms him in guilt. O’Brien’s guilt has him so fixated on the life of his victim that his own presence in the story—as protagonist and narrator—fades to the black. Since he doesn’t use the first person to explain his guilt and confusion, he negotiates his feelings by operating in fantasy—by imagining an entire life for his victim, from his boyhood and his family to his feeling about the war and about the Americans. In The Man I Killed, Tim O’Brien explores the truth of The Vietnam War by vividly describing the dead body and the imagined life of the man he has killed to question the morality of killing in a war that seems to have no point to him.