Death In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

1344 Words3 Pages

The author of Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck, focuses on the idea that the extremity of suffering is greater than that of death. The ending is foreseeable and bearable because Steinbeck crafts the whole book so that it builds up and prepares readers for the ending, the most profound action that exemplifies this main motif. To create such a book, he foreshadows Lennie’s fate, includes an event where Candy has to make decisions similar to those in the end, and compiles a series of instances throughout the book regarding Lennie’s misunderstanding of his own physical strength and death itself. Foreshadowing of the events that occur at the end of the book include Steinbeck having George show where Lennie is to hide if he were to do …show more content…

After George reprimands Lennie for killing mice, the book states, “Lennie looked sadly up at him. ‘They was so little,’ he said apologetically. ‘I’d pet ʼem, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and then they was dead–because they was so little.’”(10). The foundation is set in place for Lennie’s eventual crime with this quote by showing that Lennie does not understand his own strength and what taking a life truly means, and he only understands that when it is not moving it is dead and that George will be mad at him for it. Comparatively, this is a relatively modest crime and does not shock the reader, instead easies them into Steinbeck’s overall plan to make the reader eventually decide their opinion in the most extreme case of his implied inquiry. After killing the puppy, Lennie says to it, “Now maybe George ain’t gonna let me tend no rabbits, if he fin’s out you got killed’... his anger arose. ‘God damn you,’ he cried. ‘Why do you got to get killed? You ain’t so little as mice. I didn’t bounce you hard” (85). Lennie’s true, unfiltered thoughts penned by Steinbeck near the end of the book reveals Lennie’s shallow understanding, how he thinks that it is the puppy’s fault that it died. The author also superimpose his lack of comprehension with the puppy’s death angers Lennie because he knows how irritated George will be when he finds out and he might threaten to not let him have rabbits. This is the epitome of his childlike ignorance and shows that Lennie is neither virtuous or immoral, he does not understand what death is. These two killings happen from smallest to largest in magnitude and chronology. Steinbeck is able to prepare

Open Document