Dear Zachary Film Analysis

1135 Words3 Pages

Dear Zachary is a heart-wrenching documentary made by filmmaker Kurt Kuenne. Originally intended as a tribute for the deceased Andrew Bagby’s unborn son, Zachary, the purpose changes drastically when Shirley Turner, Andrew’s ex-girlfriend and killer (and Zachary’s mother), kills Zachary in a tragic murder-suicide. Believing that Shirley Turner should never have had custody of Zachary and that poorly made bail laws led to Zachary’s death, Kuenne alters his documentary to have a more argumentative message. Kurt Kuenne’s argument in his documentary Dear Zachary is that bail laws for those charged with a serious crime need to be reformed in order to protect people – especially any children – who may fall under the custody of the accused criminal. …show more content…

Midway through the film, Kuenne uses the visual of a calendar that shows the constant delays of Shirley’s murder trial. (These delays were made possible because Shirley was permitted to be released on bail while she was in the United States, allowing her to escape to Canada.) Later, Kuenne includes a visual of Judge Gale Welsh accompanied by a quote stating that even if Turner did murder Andrew, it is not necessary to detain her until she is tried for that crime because the crime was “specific in nature,” and she therefore does not present a danger to the public – a quote which justified allowing Shirley to be bailed out of jail a second time. In each of these instances, the use of graphics allows the viewer to both hear and visualize Kuenne’s words. Kuenne enhances this effect by using the same graphics repeatedly, drilling his message into the viewer’s minds even further. Thus, the viewer has a clear understanding of errors that Kuenne saw in the bail laws that led Shirley to have custody over Andrew. It is important that the viewer has such an understanding so that they can see the basis of Kuenne’s

Open Document