David Tenenbaum: Rhetorical Analysis Of Why The Flies

685 Words2 Pages

As the Earth’s population grows, a plethora of people crave more meat to consume. However, as urbanization grows, farmland is becoming difficult to find. The lack of farmland will limit the amount of meat produced from these animals as their population starts to decline. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization recommends people digesting more insects. In the “UN Recommend Eating More Bugs” as reported in The Why Flies, David Tenenbaum builds an argument that eating insects can resolve a world food problem by using the ethos, logos and pathos appeal to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument.
Tenenbaum uses testimonials of people on the idea of eating insects to prove insects help increase the scarce amount of food in the world. They served one group fried bee larvae and “they think, ‘this tastes really good, familiar.’” If people’s views on insects start to shift, then more insects would be considered an edible dinner. It would help our world ecologically by limiting the use of butchering animals. It also uses a worldwide known book, “in the Bible, …show more content…

An example is “advocates of edible insects point out that they are related to crabs and shrimp”, this shows that insects can be treated as if they were seafood and can become desirable to consume. Another example is that “entomophagy, as it clunkily called, is becoming hipster-faddish in some maxi-trending venues.” Entomophagy is the human consumption of insects and as it’s becoming more popular, it’s being expanded into different areas; meaning more people exposed and eating bugs. Phillip Pellitteri said “if you get past factor that it’s an insect and just taste it, some [dishes] have interesting flavors”. Therefore, moving past the disgusting factor, the consumer would become intrigued with the food. The pathos appeal was in effect through the descriptive word

Open Document