David Sternberg Love

1924 Words4 Pages

Love is an extremely subjective topic; thus, it must be defined as objectively as possible to be used as a viable mode of explanation for the events in The Epic of Gilgamesh. As shown in Robert J. Sternberg's triangular theory of love, love can be manifested in several different ways. As stated in Karin Sternberg's Psychology of Love 101 "[Robert] Sternberg suggests that we can view love as a triangle whose sides are formed by three different components: intimacy, passion, and commitment" (Sternberg 44). The three of these components seen jointly equate to consummate love. Having only intimacy in a relationship is defined as friendship and having only passion is infatuated love. When the only trait is commitment empty love is exemplified. While having both intimacy and passion in a relationship is romantic love, a relationship having intimacy and commitment is companionate love. A relationship containing both passion and commitment is said to be fatuous, and one containing …show more content…

As described by Karin Sternberg "Agape is a mixture of eros and storge. It is an altruistic, giving kind of love. The loved one’s welfare is placed before one’s own welfare" (Sternberg 39). Agape is the type of love Christian doctrine describes as being optimal, as it is the most selfless example of romantic love shown between humans. Enkidu often exemplifies the principles of agape. For example, prior to their journey to defeat Humbaba Enkidu was reluctant to take on this endeavor, but in respecting Gilgamesh he agreed to take on the challenge. Enkidu's reluctance emerged from fear of he and his partner's safety. He then reassures Gilgamesh; ensuring him that they will defeat the beast and gain the victory and respect of Uruk. Likewise, Gilgamesh reassures Enkidu in his times of doubt. Despite their own fears and reluctances, they adopt selfless principles in support of the

Open Document