Darius Milhaud Analysis

1487 Words3 Pages

On January 25, 1959, the daily newspaper in Oakland, California, ran a profile of one of the city’s well-known residents, a fifty-six-year-old French woman who had been living there, off and on, since 1940. Appearing under the headline “She Also Cooks,” the article began:
Love should decide a woman’s career. To a Frenchwoman this fact hardly needs stating. And for Madeleine Milhaud, actress, authentic beauty, wife and mother, it is the rule of her life. But though it has brought her a life of devotion to one of the great musical figures of our time, Darius Milhaud, greatest living French composer, it hasn’t ruled out the use of her own talents. “There is no question about it,” she says, “women have to work—I am absolutely for the complete activity …show more content…

I had already decided to include a chapter on his wife, because I knew from my preliminary research that she was a vital part of the story I would tell, and I did not want to keep her in the background. But, as I began to realize, the figure of “the composer’s wife” poses a particular problem for feminist musicologists. The field of musicology has a history of elevating composers above everyone else—and of viewing music composition as an essentially masculine type of creativity. Without a feminist lens, it is all too easy to view the wife of a composer as either a passive muse or a destructive force. Yet the more immediately appealing subjects for feminist musicology are women who can challenge male-dominated historiography on its own terms—those with their own independent careers in composition or another music-related profession. In the case of a composer’s wife, the impulse may be to portray her as a creative force “in her own right” and to resist interpretations that place her primarily in her husband’s …show more content…

Many newspaper articles described her background in acting and her ongoing work as a teacher and director. However, she was careful not to appear as if she wished to take the spotlight for herself. Her characterization as a bright and interesting person “in her own right”—as she absolutely was—had the dual effect of highlighting her individuality and of making her insistence that her husband was her first priority seem all the more striking and

Open Document