Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles and functions of theatre and drama
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roles and functions of theatre and drama
The plays trajectory throughout does not disappoint audience members as its quick paced plot continues through each of the vignettes unraveling more of each characters background. According to Joe Belanger of the London Free Press, the fast-paced show “featuring eight vignettes, [shorter than the original play] each carrying a character from the previous scene until the show comes full ‘circle’ to the real life of the bi sexual Ben whom we meet in the first scene where he was hoping to meet ‘Louis’ who turns out to be Lois” leaves the audience appreciating each of the characters for who they are (Belanger). The initial introduction between the two characters is interesting in itself—Ben looking for a man to satisfy his needs. However, to his …show more content…
Its ability to transform and transition a stage in addition to bringing life and humor as that scenes change from one encounter to the next is powerful in itself let alone the fact that it is categorized in the play as a gay man, who also happens to be powerful and playful. In the New York Times article, Playing Spin the Bottle (With an Adult Twist), the author sheds light on the actor, Danny Wiseman, who played the undresser in the off-Broadway production. His job is rather simple when in character, he helps “the others change clothes onstage in between scenes, although in some cases the garb is so spare a breath might waft it away” (The New York Times). The undresser may even just have the best role of all. Besides taking off other people’s clothes, Wiseman had “no lines to learn” and “his gestures are broad lurid pantomime”, his character is able to stay in the audience’s memory the longest. (The New York Times). But to what extent does the undressers body, along with the rest of the casts bodies, change from paper to stage? Their bodies become realistic—vivid and alluring all at the same time, making this particular show erotically
The characters address the audience; the fast movement from scene to scene juxtaposing past and present and prevents us from identifying with particular characters, forcing us to assess their points of view; there are few characters who fail to repel us, as they display truly human complexity and fallibility. That fallibility is usually associated with greed and a ruthless disregard for the needs of others. Emotional needs are rarely acknowledged by those most concerned with taking what they maintain is theirs, and this confusion of feeling and finance contributes to the play's ultimate bleak mood.
The scenes, which cover thirty years of the characters’ lives from eight to thirty-eight, each revolve around an injury that Doug has acquired through his accident prone life. The play progresses in five year intervals, jumping backwards and forwards, in a nonlinear progression. As they travel and run into each other’s lives, the two characters face new injuries. As the play progresses every five years, a new injury is added to one or both characters. Their lives intersect through these injuries, leading them to compare their wounds, both physical (Doug) and emotional (Kayleen), and drawing them closer together. With each new scene, old injuries and problems may have gotten better or resolved, but some became permanent. Yet, through these experiences, they are bonded together through bloodstains, cuts, and bandages.
A significant aspect of the play is the acting and wardrobe, because it helps demonstrate the personalities of the characters.
In conclusion I think that the stage directions and dramatic irony are significant to the play, and without them there would be no need for a lot of the events that happen in the play.
one of the most important reasons could be the use of humour in the play.
...the story. It gives us no insight on why the characters were put in this position and why they would even end up being together if they know there will be no happy end. I don’t think it is a movie about love, just a slice of the lives of the two as it happens during that period. Ben is an alcoholic and because of the amount he is drinking, he can not be fully aware of his actions and decisions about what is going on around him. Sera is just a prostitute that loves having control over her clients and has gone through a lot of abuse and out of desperation takes in any guy that treats her humanely. In return for Ben’s loving, Sera slips in the role of the prostitute at the end when she pours liquor over her breasts and lets Ben lick it off fulfilling his greatest fantasy. The story is very slow at times and is not suitable for every audience. For some, it may be too vulgar, for others just too boring, but I believe Figgis and both actors did remarkable jobs. The story is obviously not meant to entertain or to be the typical Hollywood romance drama, but to show Sera and Ben’s relationship leading to isolation, anxiety and self-destruction because life does not always have a happy end.
I feel that this play has been so famous because of the links to the audience, and the universal themes of love and hate will cause empathy amongst the viewers for probably evermore.
he plays a major part in the play, and appears in most of the major
One reason that this play is well known is because many of the characters are identifiable with ourselves. Willy is a burnt-out businessman with no special talents or qualities. Linda is a kind and dedicated housewife, but she has not accomplished anything noteworthy. Biff has a habit of theft and a number of pent-up frustrations. Happy tries to smooth out the tensions in the family, but he is also unsatisfied. The only “successful” major character in the play is Bernard, but even he was considered “liked, but not well-liked” by the Lomans when he was young. There are not any heroes or bad guys in the play. The characters are all very human, and very flawed.
The main question that rises is why this play has been read for so long. The story consists of two “ star- crossed '; lovers who fall in love at first sight. One of the main reasons why this play has been so popular is because stories in those times relied more on the life and spirit of the play. For generations people saw in this play a reflection of their own life and experiences.
This play is like a story from a book, you get inside of the main actors thoughts just
...ns of gender, and anxiety surrounding his newly “female” position and its implications. His newfound identity is rendered entirely dependent upon his portrayal of the role he formerly attempted to flee, and its finality is reliant upon Bertram’s capability as an actor – which, as has been demonstrated throughout the play, is as tenuous as the masculinity he seeks to embody. When made to reconcile the relationship between performance, gender, and the blurring of a social order, Bertram becomes disoriented, and relies ultimately upon the conventions of theatre: he falls back into his prescribed role, and, as such, may finally begin to portray his journey into manhood.
The first act sets up the ordinary world of the protagonist, Suzy. She’s works for a candy company, she’s single, and doesn’t know how to meet men.
audience and given the qualities of a tragic hero. Throughout the play he is dominated
Reelviews review of the film describes the life and vitality of the play as amazing. The majority of this vitality and energy within the play exudes from Thompson and Branaghs sparkling duet. Packed full of passion and charisma they capture the essence of Shakespeare’s original words and deliver a terrific performance onto the silver screen. Between the two they successfully convey the huge amount of chemistry between them onto the screen, undoubtedly leaving any onlooker with a smile on their face. Beatrice and Benedicks developing relationship is such a joy to watch throughout the play. Not only has Branagh successfully kept the comedic value of the original play intact, but also cemented a spectacular romantic one throughout. Word count: 495